Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
According to Rick Spivey, partner at financial services firm Crawford Advisors, instruments known as SIMPLE IRAs are becoming more popular with small businesses. He said steep costs connected with administering a 401(k) plan deter many small-business owners from offering the plan to employees.
“The SIMPLE IRAs are becoming more prevalent,” Spivey said in an interview with The Examiner. “You don’t have a third-party administrator. ... It looks and feels like a 401(k) plan but doesn’t come with the administrative costs.”
“SIMPLE IRAs are set up for smaller employers who shy away” from these expenses, he said.
This is because the SIMPLE (which stands for Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees) IRAs do not require outside agents to manage the money. The savings are placed into an account that only the employee can access. The employee then manages the money without the need for a third-party administrator, sparing the employer the additional cost.
“Pre-tax dollars are going into it,” Spivey said. “It operates very much the same way a 401(k) would operate, with an employee contribution.”
It is only available to employers with no more than 1,000 employees, each of whom earned more than $5,000 in the previous year.
dfrancis@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
1:59 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "City faces $2.9 billion gap in retiree health benefits"
Report as inappropriate
8:01 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 25, 2008
re: "Howard considering trust fund for retiree benefits obligation"
Report as inappropriate
7:11 AM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007
re: "More than $10M set aside for retiree benefits"
Report as inappropriate
5:58 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 20, 2007
re: "More than $10M set aside for retiree benefits"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Oh sure, raise my taxes. It doesn't matter that I have no retirement plan. That I have worked since I was 16 years old, not including babysitting when I was younger that 16. All the hardworking state employees, I say hard working because I see them napping in yellow trucks, deserve a big fat retirement check. And the city employees, with all the hard work they do by shopping using city credit cards is tiring. They deserve it also! Take my money, what little I have left.
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Not surprised said:
Retirement should be in 401K plans. With the county and the employee contributing. Then there would be no unfunded liability!
32 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Baltimore County's website makes no mention of a 5 % penalty , nor does it tell you how they aren't finish yet... if this information is true then employees who have been loyal and hard working are to be pusished for their committment. If the Administration and Council and Govenment on all levels really are so worried about the system , then perhaps they should show how much they care about all of their constituens out here in the communities it by reaching into thier own retirement systems/pockets and pay into the Social Security System. and Retirement system and cut their pays.. Excuse me, but it would seem that we have elected people who have no problem taking pensions from workers who are the backbone of the entire system....yet..pay nothing themselves... I think that perhaps it may be time that government "for the people" replaces "by the people" with "real people."
159 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Howard County's approach to funding their retirement liability is not being done by ravaging the current employee's retirement as Baltimore County Executive Jim Smith is trying to do. They also have a Spending Committee evaluating the financial impact. Baltimore County did not have the pension system evaluated prior to proposing the radical changes to the current retirement system.
172 agree | 151 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree