Examiners

Eric Elkins
Internet Business Examiner
Most Recent Post
Great piece on keeping up on your marketing
Find the Examiners
writing about your
favorite topics.

Multimedia News

Sexiest older women. How old are they?
20 photos
Actress Kate Walsh poses for pictures after l...
Beautiful people in Cannes
20 photos
Australian actress Diana Glenn poses for phot...
Celebs out and about
18 photos
Actress Lindsay Lohan arrives at the Diesel x...
NFL Sunday
20 photos
New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre passes ...
The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...

SIMPLE IRAs give small-business owners retirement saving options

Jul 25, 2007 12:00 AM (446 days ago) by David Francis, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
For SIMPLE IRAs, the savings are placed into an account that only the employee can access. The employee then manages the money without the need for a third-party administrator, sparing the employer the additional cost.
(Getty Images)
For SIMPLE IRAs, the savings are placed into an account that only the employee can access. The employee then manages the money without the need for a third-party administrator, sparing the employer the additional cost.
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - For small-business owners in search of retirement-savings instruments for employees, there are options beyond the traditional 401(k) and IRA.

According to Rick Spivey, partner at financial services firm Crawford Advisors, instruments known as SIMPLE IRAs are becoming more popular with small businesses. He said steep costs connected with administering a 401(k) plan deter many small-business owners from offering the plan to employees.

“The SIMPLE IRAs are becoming more prevalent,” Spivey said in an interview with The Examiner. “You don’t have a third-party administrator. ... It looks and feels like a 401(k) plan but doesn’t come with the administrative costs.”

“SIMPLE IRAs are set up for smaller employers who shy away” from these expenses, he said.

This story continues below
Advertisement

This is because the SIMPLE (which stands for Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees) IRAs do not require outside agents to manage the money. The savings are placed into an account that only the employee can access. The employee then manages the money without the need for a third-party administrator, sparing the employer the additional cost.

“Pre-tax dollars are going into it,” Spivey said. “It operates very much the same way a 401(k) would operate, with an employee contribution.”

It is only available to employers with no more than 1,000 employees, each of whom earned more than $5,000 in the previous year.

dfrancis@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

1:59 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "City faces $2.9 billion gap in retiree health benefits"

Examiner Reader said:
Oh sure, raise my taxes. It doesn't matter that I have no retirement plan. That I have worked since I was 16 years old, not including babysitting when I was younger that 16. All the hardworking state employees, I say hard working because I see them napping in yellow trucks, deserve a big fat retirement check. And the city employees, with all the hard work they do by shopping using city credit cards is tiring. They deserve it also! Take my money, what little I have left.

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:01 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 25, 2008 re: "Howard considering trust fund for retiree benefits obligation"

Not surprised said:
Retirement should be in 401K plans. With the county and the employee contributing. Then there would be no unfunded liability!

32 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:11 AM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007 re: "More than $10M set aside for retiree benefits"

Examiner Reader said:
Baltimore County's website makes no mention of a 5 % penalty , nor does it tell you how they aren't finish yet... if this information is true then employees who have been loyal and hard working are to be pusished for their committment. If the Administration and Council and Govenment on all levels really are so worried about the system , then perhaps they should show how much they care about all of their constituens out here in the communities it by reaching into thier own retirement systems/pockets and pay into the Social Security System. and Retirement system and cut their pays.. Excuse me, but it would seem that we have elected people who have no problem taking pensions from workers who are the backbone of the entire system....yet..pay nothing themselves... I think that perhaps it may be time that government "for the people" replaces "by the people" with "real people."

159 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:58 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 20, 2007 re: "More than $10M set aside for retiree benefits"

Examiner Reader said:
Howard County's approach to funding their retirement liability is not being done by ravaging the current employee's retirement as Baltimore County Executive Jim Smith is trying to do. They also have a Spending Committee evaluating the financial impact. Baltimore County did not have the pension system evaluated prior to proposing the radical changes to the current retirement system.

172 agree | 151 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement