|
|
Article History
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Dismissing the GOP presidential field as a "pathetic" bunch of "pygmies," Newt Gingrich hinted Monday he might step in to beat Democrats Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.
"If, in mid-October, it's quite clear that one or more of the current candidates is strong enough to be a serious alternative to a Clinton-Obama ticket, you don't need me to run," the former House Speaker said at a breakfast sponsored by the American Spectator. "If it becomes patently obvious, as the morning paper points out, that the Democrats have raised a hundred million more than the Republicans, and at some point people decide we are going to get Hillary unless there's a radical change, then there's space for a candidate," he added. "So you'll know by mid-October one of those two futures is real."
Asked by the Examiner if he was prepared to commit to a run, Gingrich said, "I'm perfectly happy to do what I do," he said. "Whether that leads to the presidency is the country's problem, not mine."
Gingrich mocked Republican presidential candidates for subjecting themselves to a May debate hosted by Chris Matthews of MSNBC's "Hardball."
"You're watching an utterly irrelevant, shallow television celebrity dominate everybody who claimed they want to lead the most powerful nation in the world," he said.
Gingrich ridiculed "the idea of 10 or 11 people standing passively at microphones," and said he refused to "shrink to the level of 40-second answers, standing like a trained seal, waiting for someone to throw me a fish."
|
He added: "These are not debates, these are auditions. By definition, the psychology of an audition reduces the person auditioning and raises the status, for example, of Chris Matthews."
Pressed by The Examiner about whether his political baggage renders him unelectable, Gingrich compared himself to a famous French statesman. "This is like going to De Gaulle when he was at Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises during the Fourth Republic and saying, 'Don't you want to rush in and join the pygmies?'" he said.
"I have no interest in the current political process. I have no interest in trying to figure out how I can go out and raise money under John McCain's insane censorship rules so I can show up to do seven minutes and twenty seconds at some debate." Still, he said he might enter the race before the deadlines to "start filing petitions.
ALSO READ: Newt Unplugged
# 4 of 6,649 |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
Comments from Examiner Readers
2:41 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 11, 2008 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
2:11 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 11, 2008 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
11:45 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007 re: "Newt unplugged"
Report as inappropriate
11:24 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 12, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
10:11 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 26, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
1:50 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
10:27 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
9:28 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
7:37 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
7:05 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
12:49 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
12:04 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 25, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
11:31 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
11:04 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
10:46 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
10:34 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
10:28 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
10:23 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
9:19 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
8:37 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
7:26 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
7:19 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
6:37 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
6:32 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
6:18 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
4:21 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt unplugged"
Report as inappropriate
4:15 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt unplugged"
Report as inappropriate
4:14 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt unplugged"
Report as inappropriate
4:07 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt unplugged"
Report as inappropriate
4:01 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt unplugged"
Report as inappropriate
3:59 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt unplugged"
Report as inappropriate
3:58 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
3:55 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt unplugged"
Report as inappropriate
3:49 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
3:40 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
3:09 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
3:05 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt unplugged"
Report as inappropriate
3:01 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
2:51 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
1:38 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
12:59 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
12:57 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
12:48 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
12:32 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
11:50 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
11:20 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
11:16 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
11:13 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
11:11 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
11:06 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 24, 2007 re: "Newt Gingrich goes nuclear: May enter race to foil 'pygmies'"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Bah Humbug
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I have until now been in Newt's corner but his scorn for McClain as a "pygmie" forever relegates him to the dust bin in my estimation. John may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer but compared to the opposition but he is head and shoulders above the rest. Q.E.D. Take that professor!
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I say follow the Beaton path. Newt is brillant . I chalenge any of the presidential candidates to debate Newt and win.I am sure Rush Limbaugh will give that chance to anyone to do so on his radio show GOD BLESS AMERICA Newt has the Beaton family vote Fran beaton
216 agree | 171 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
newt is agood and competent person who would make a great president i hope he runs he has my vote as well as the other 4 members of my family god bless america
154 agree | 178 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Rick Tyler, Press Secretary for Newt Gingrich said:
Sammon's story is yet another example of how our political process is broken. Gingrich when asked by Bill about running made a simple historical analogy. He likened his interest in joining the race in its current form to Charles de Gualle�s interest in joining the Fourth Republic, a political and governing system which he disdained. The comparison is fitting. To solve France�s innumerable problems required dramatic reforms that could not be realized from within the then failing political system. America has seemingly intractable problems. What is needed at the core of the presidential race are bold solutions and bold leadership that transcend partisan political posturing. It was clear to anyone in the room that Gingrich was referring to de Gualle and the analogy of a broken political system and not to any of the candidates running for President. Sammon ignored the important analogy, and choose instead to focus on the banality of horserace politics.
302 agree | 320 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
To all of the Michael Savage, aka Weiner followers, Weiner is NOT ON THE CONSERVATIVE TEAM. Please do not quote him as a reliable authority as he is "outside the camp". Thank you.
208 agree | 223 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Newt Gingrich may not be electable, but he is an "American" hero (Not French) who would make the race entertaining enough to participate, or have some interest. For the commercial political pro's he would add a few hundred million dollars to your bottom line.
181 agree | 222 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hmmm, this guy was reprimanded by his House peers and required to pay a $300,000 fine for his ethics violations in 1997. If that isn't unelectable bagge, I don't know what is! We need this kind of elected official like we need another BUSH in the White House. PLEASE keep this guy away from any and all elected office.
226 agree | 236 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Rick Bankert said:
In regards to Examiner Reader at 12:04 MST who said the other candiates should be forced to debate Newt; That is the American way, (just the US part of America, not Canada or Mexico, the other part of America)to force people to do things. I wouldn't waste my time debating Newt. He won't even go see "Sicko" (the movie) so how can he debate anyone. He only knows about things he wants to know about.!!!!!!! I feel sorry for anyone who gets colon cancer because they couldn't afford a colonoscopy because Newt didn't push universal health care through when he was speaker of the house. Thank-you Rush Limbaugh, (illegal drug purchaser)for brain washing the American lemming (public) into thinking we don't need Universal Health care because it doesn't cover heart transplants. Those of you with polyps better pray for a miracle.
268 agree | 233 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
he couldn't hold onto the speakers chair, couldn't get re-elected, couldn't remain married, does he really think he has a chance to be President? He's almost as crazy as the current resident of 1600 pa. ave....
208 agree | 189 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Of the rich people, by the rich people, for the rich people, right Newt?
209 agree | 211 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The six words that will strike fear in any candidate running, Republican or Democrat are "I dare you to debate Newt." If you really want to judge the competance and substance of a candidate, make him or her debate Newt for two hours. They should all be made to do this whether Newt runs or not.
210 agree | 176 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Bwah ha ha ha!!!! Please run Newt. We need the entertainment.
212 agree | 305 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Ruby said:
I think it was President Truman who said: Why should I trust a man if his wife can't?
274 agree | 195 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sixgun98 said:
I would like to see a Paul/Gingrich Ticket in '08... better yet a Paul/Coulter Ticket!!!
368 agree | 180 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Aerostar said:
Bush should resign! Give us BACK the Republican Party. Now! The Republican Party flourished under Reagan because he talked �The People�s Language.� Blue collar and White collar Americans supported him because he took the complex and made it simple. The general (non-elitist) public enjoyed more freedom and opportunity under Reagan than ever before. He defeated Dimmie (short for Dimwit) Carter with the term �Misery Index.� He asked, �are we better off under Carter, or worse off?� Newt (I can support him), Ron Paul (I�d rather have him) or Governor Mike Huckabee (I�d love to see him as nominee) will have to run AGAINST Bush. Forget the party. Bush fails now, because he talks Globalist/Elitist language. If Bush prevails, the Republican party is doomed. Bush should gracefully resign "for personal reasons," (do it for the good of the country) and remove the stigma from the party. Give the new challengers a sporting of a chance, if it any longer exists.
321 agree | 332 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Aerostar said:
Bush II said that radical muslims hijacked a historic faith. I say that Bush has hijacked the Republican Party. He deceptively tried to sell us Harriet Miers, Dubai-Ports for our Shipping Security, Rules Of Engagement that make patriot soldiers into criminals, and Rules of Evidence that make Border Patrol heroes into criminals. He over-reachingly commutes Scooter Libby, yet wimps out when he should have pardoned Ramos & Compean.
209 agree | 200 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Aerostar said:
Newt admittedly has character problems. Many will refuse to vote for him simply because of that. This narrow minded thinking may well cost us the next term. These voters should remember, we are electing a President, not a Pastor. He is natural man and not a Messiah! Newt is undoubtedly the most innovative thinker in modern political times! His public reputation will probably prevent him from developing a sufficiently wide spread popular support. However, he should not be written off yet. His brilliance has energized the Republican Party many previous times, and it will surely happen again.
262 agree | 339 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Alex said:
Regardless of your political persuasion or view of Newt G., you have to agree with his comments that these debates force candidates to "stand like a trained seal, waiting for someone to throw a fish" and don't actually improve the national conversation. People like Chris Matthews love to hear themselves talk, and should be disregarded at all costs!
307 agree | 320 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
God help us if he should get elected....there may be someone worse than the current occupant!!!
259 agree | 363 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Newt is a Shill like all of the GOP that are in favor of selling our sovereign United States of America into a communitarian North American Union with the ONE EXCEPTION.....The Ethical and honorable Ron Paul.
221 agree | 320 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Newt would get my vote over Rudy, Romney, McCain.But not Ron Paul.
180 agree | 320 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The reason China is gleefully driving America toward currency crisis is because we are tied down in "the war on terror." Our C Student president bit like a fish...
304 agree | 353 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"We've been there over 50 years and we aren't leaving. What will Newt do about that if he is elected president?" At 12 billion per month we won't last 50 years in Iraq. At the lowball estimate of 500 billion we simply cant afford to stay for years and years. What would Pres. Gingrich do about that? The same thing anyone else would. Get out before the dollar is worth pennies ......(well on its way now because of our C student president and his C student war....)
222 agree | 306 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Re: Dred's assertion that Newt should've arranged to send the Peace Corps and more money to Pakistan in order to avert jealousy is naive, and so wrong. Poverty does not cause terrorism---militant ISLAM does. Those upper-middle class doctors in the UK who tried to set off three car bombs prove my point.
305 agree | 175 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Sam Smith said:
It is a travesty that this political buffonery continues. Gingrich is too busy calling people names to think about things like homeland security. There is a border crossing in Minnesota that doesn't even have a guard. You fly into Canada from anywhere you want and then walk accross the border. The next thing you know your having Ham and Eggs in Carolina. Whe n Newt was Speaker of the House, why didn't he have these open borders closed?
274 agree | 223 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Dred you are right on the money. It also would have prevented the genocide of 3600 19 and 20 year old American boys. We are in Iraq to stay. Just look at Korea. We've been there over 50 years and we aren't leaving. What will Newt do about that if he is elected president?
230 agree | 202 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You're absolutely right, Dred. And no, I doubt Newt's ever been anything but self-serving and parochial, never thinking globally and how we fit into the worldwide puzzle.
249 agree | 206 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Dred Lockes said:
Excellent point examiner reader. Speaking of the Peace Corps, isn't it a shame that we didn't send the Peace Corps into Pakistan twenty years ago and bring that impoverished nation out of the stone age before they became so jealous of the US that they started harboring terrorists. A few farmsand a couple of factories and some decent housing would have made all of the difference. Did Newt ever propose anything like this when he was speaker of the house?
272 agree | 218 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Actually JFK said in his famous inauguration speech that introduced the idea of the Peace Corps, "Ask not what your COUNTRY can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." But your point's well-taken, Dred.
206 agree | 262 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Dred Lockes said:
JFK said "Ask not what you can do for yourself. Ask what you can do for your country". Newt Gingrich said, "Howa about another tax cut so I can pad my bank account?
278 agree | 207 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think this once great nation is in serious trouble when politicians instead of statesmen run for president. The same is true for congressmen. Leadershp is missing in so many areas and sadly I see no inclination that it will change anytime soon. Neither our nations leaders or the common man on the street have any backbone or ability to stand alone in a crisis. We are all sheep without a shepherd.
331 agree | 344 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Michael Vick said:
I like Newt. He's a good guy.
281 agree | 237 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Sam Smith said:
Newt is inappropriate.
236 agree | 206 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Henry Howard said:
Newt Gingrich is a festering boil on the Republicans butt. Even if he were a virgin, he would still be a boil on the Republican's butt. The Democrats would just love it if this parasite got the Republican nomination.
292 agree | 233 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"Do you seriously think a serial adulterer and liar is fit to be President of this great country?" Ummmmmmmm. Several of them have been presidents of this great country. Kennedy and Clinton spring to mind.
286 agree | 198 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mr. Newt is one of the most brilliant thinkers of this century. I guess all the comments from the left wing suicide squad show just how selective their memory is. Where were these people when our president was getting BJ's in the oval office? That really raised the respect for the office , didn't it? The truth is noone is without flaw in he personal life. Anyone who claims to be on a higher ethical plane than the rest of humanity, just let me know! Hypocrites!
252 agree | 225 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
HabanoHo said:
Gingrich is brilliant and articulate. His candor, however, along with his personal morals, makes him unelectable.
259 agree | 328 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Bernie said:
Newt is the same adulterer his counterparts on the godless left are. He has no moral high ground and will never get my vote. Looks like my vote will be "Nope of the above" for President
292 agree | 345 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Soooo....Adulterer Gingrich thinks he is qualified to step in and beat Hillary Clinton or Barak Obama if need be. Here are some questions the "irrelevant, shallow television celebrity" Chris Matthews can ask adulterer Gingrich: "Are you still an adulterer? How long have you been an adulterer? What lies did you tell and to whom were you lying when you were out fornicating with women who were not your current wife? Do you seriously think a serial adulterer and liar is fit to be President of this great country?"
296 agree | 337 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
True American Patriot said:
This fellow is truly nothing more than an ignorant blowhard. He pretends that he would be doing us a favor by allowing him to be president. His words "Whether that leads to the presidency is the country's problem, not mine." should be a clue to even the most propagandized readers. This egomaniac will self destruct at the first opportunity.
291 agree | 332 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'd be better off voting for a fig newton than a newt grinch.
240 agree | 291 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
i totally agree with Newt about the debates. Total bunch of uninformed candidates who does not come across as inteligent or sensible in any way , shape or form. I watched last night, and remembered why i dont watch, and why i will not vote.
269 agree | 331 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Alexander Romanov said:
Newt Gingrich may be the most serious GOP candidate. I met Newt personally just a while ago and he has made an immense impression on me. He is definitely the most reputable candidate up until now and will make a GREAT PRESIDENT, if he wins. He certainly got mine and my wife's vote already. I hope he gets all the other votes necessary to win the presidential election.
298 agree | 337 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Readers said:
Run Newt - global warning is a farce - we need all the hot air you blow! Newt is pathetic, hypocritical egomaniac. What a joke!
318 agree | 288 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
One moral-relativist Examiner Reader .... said:
.... reckons that Hot-Springs-Billy-Bubbah Blythe (alias Cli'ton) was picked on because of his "adultary?' -- Give us a break. Nobody with even half a brain (the loathsome and fearsome co-serial rapist, Missus 'Hot-Springs-Billy-Bubba' Blythe-Rodman, for example) bought the suggestion that release of information about one instance of the treasonous, recidivist, racketeering, lying, looting, thieving, mass-murdering, convicted, sentenced, dis-barred and held in contempt of court, civil-rights-denier, perjurer, suborner of perjury and impeached Cli'ton's "adultery" was other than a carefully self-strategized distraction from the very serious charges relating to foreign financing of his political campaigns and treason -- and worse -- he was facing at the time. Particularly in connection with his own and his "administration's" treasonous transfer of more than a Trillion Dollars of America's most precious nuclear, aerospace, computer and rocketry and other secrets to his Peking m
361 agree | 311 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Count me in!
230 agree | 345 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Newt joins race = I'll definately be campaigning for him!
324 agree | 324 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Well they won't vote anyway so what difference does it make. I work with the "poor" everyday and maybe they should keep the cell bill under a 100.00 a month and they all have cable with added services. Most of the ones I deal with are poor because of poor money choices. We will always have the poor as long as people spend money differently.
208 agree | 322 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Newt will make any democrat look ignorant. Whether you like him or not he is a very smart, very well read and he is a great public speaker. Not out of the realm of possiblity
272 agree | 289 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree