Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
As members of al-Zarqawi’s organization typed messages, agents back home read along. The Agency calls it Digital Network Intelligence. But as promising as it seemed, such eavesdropping sometimes provided only clues. Terrorists often write in code: “I’ve got the groceries” may mean the terrorist has acquired needed guns or bomb parts.
Also targeting Internet cafés was another al-Zarqawi hunter: Task Force Orange, a six-hundred-person military spy unit. The e-mails captured by the CIA and Task Force Orange could tell eavesdroppers where to focus electronic intercepts. Al Qaeda operatives in Iraq used cell phones constantly to coordinate bombings. Seized cell phones often provided a list of key phone numbers to monitor.
The CIA played a key role in the hunt for al-Zarqawi, but in many ways, the most important figure was Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
Rumsfeld was the man chiefly responsible for getting the Pentagon involved in developing actionable intelligence for the War on Terror. He had complained in a 2002 memo to policy guru Douglas Feith that the armed forces were not organized for manhunts, and so he set out to change that.
Rumsfeld enlarged the DIA and in March 2003 made Stephen Cambone the first undersecretary of defense for intelligence. But it wasn’t enough. Rumsfeld was determined to make his special operations forces integral components in America’s intelligence efforts against the terrorists.
His chief terrorist-hunting force was Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), headquartered in a highly secure compound at Fort Bragg. There, the elite Army Delta Force and Navy SEAL Team 6 planned and practiced counter-terrorism. These daring commandos often relied on intelligence from others, and Rumsfeld wanted to move intelligence gathering in-house. In 2006 he assigned Task Force Orange to JSOC.
Task Force Orange, known as Gray Fox at the outset of the War on Terror, performed amazingly daring missions. It had its own air fleet at Baltimore/Washington International Airport. Its members flew into countries under assumed names, principally to track people or intercept communications.
The NSA, for all its eavesdropping technology, cannot penetrate a fiber-optic telephone line. That’s why U.S. Navy submarines are used to find and splice undersea communications cables.
On land, Task Force Orange can do the same thing. Operators enter the targeted country, find the line they want to intercept, dig it up if need be, and attach a listening device.
Task Force Orange viewed al-Zarqawi as trackable. Unlike bin Laden, he was a hands-on operator. He personally met some of the foreign jihadis who entered Iraq, he did some of the planning, and he moved around the country like a field commander, encouraging his bands of murderers. Al-Zarqawi was a terrorist who relied on a cell phone.
He didn’t have his own, but borrowed others’, using them as mobile command posts to direct terror strikes. Cell phone signals even proved a perfect way to detonate deadly improvised explosive devices (IEDs) from afar.
Using a constant cell phone signal and GPS (global positioning system), the spy teams of Task Force Orange can determine a terrorist’s exact location and track him. Ali Qaed Senyan al-Harthi, one of the planners of the 2000 terrorist attack on the USS Cole, was tracked in this way and killed with a Hellfire missile. By 2006, Task Force Orange had grown larger. It was divided into units that carried out signals intelligence, human spying, and commando operations. The Pentagon added a new division in 2006: Computer Network Operations.
One thing now remained: finding a way for the CIA and NSA to share Internet café intercepts. The CIA Baghdad station had a habit of not sharing tips. But JSOC, the Agency, and the NSA eventually worked out an agreement. The Joint Interagency Coordination Group, operating out of Balad, now circulates intelligence.
With all these pieces in place, the hunt for al-Zarqawi was on. Targeting the Internet cafés turned up al Qaeda operatives, who were then followed. The process: match e-mails from an al Qaeda member with cell phones that were in the vicinity of the café at the same time. The NSA collected the phone numbers, intercepted them, and identified the speakers.
The procedure created a list of al-Zarqawi’s followers, including his successor, Abu Ayyub al-Masri. Task Force Orange, using its fleet of mobile ground interceptors and aircraft, tracked these followers. It was listening when an Islamic religious advisor to al Qaeda talked of visiting al-Zarqawi.
Spies and spy aircraft followed him. When he traveled to al-Zarqawi’s hideout near Baquba, north of Baghdad, JSOC’s hands-on commander, Lieutenant General Stanley McChrystal, had his man. The Baghdad command quickly summoned two Air National Guard pilots, and an F-16 put bombs right on target.
Al-Zarqawi lay dying as U.S. personnel arrived less than an hour later. Among the people identifying the late Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was McChrystal. President Bush was so impressed that he singled out McChrystal and his organization at a White House press conference.
McChrystal, handpicked by Rumsfeld, was a new kind of JSOC commander. He spent little time at his Fort Bragg headquarters—or at any headquarters, for that matter. He was a three-star general who designed raids and then went on them alongside the enlisted men.
The hit on al-Zarqawi had been a perfect operation, from Rumsfeld’s point of view: military intelligence leading to a military manhunt leading to a military air strike. “Rumsfeld wanted to go over the heads of the CIA if he had to,” a military officer told me. “Now he had JSOC to do what the CIA did.”
JSOC had had a dry run before nabbing al-Zarqawi. Insurgents kidnapped American Jill Carroll, a freelance journalist writing an article for the Christian Science Monitor. When an American is nabbed in Iraq, JSOC goes into overdrive. In this case Task Force Orange picked up the communications of men linked to the kidnappers.
Delta Force and SEALs started breaking down doors, killing and capturing terrorists. One raid led to information for the next raid. They later determined Carroll was usually held at a farmhouse in Baquba.
JSOC, along with British Secret Air Service operatives, raided the farmhouse, capturing twenty terrorists and killing five. Carroll was not there, but Task Force Orange was getting closer—as was proved when Carroll’s captors suddenly released her. She was too hot, and JSOC was too good. As one special operator told me, the kidnappers had decided: “Here, you take her. Get off our backs.”
ABOUT "SABOTAGE": The articles in this series are drawn from “Sabotage,” a book appearing this week from Regnery Publishing. Author Rowan Scarborough, The Examiner’s national security correspondent, tells the story of a CIA bureaucracy that badly damaged the Bush administration with leaks, false allegations and sheer incompetency. He interviewed scores of intelligence and defense sources to paint a picture of an agency that fell into disarray under former President Bill Clinton and that is still rebuilding in the sixth year of the War on Terror. Scarborough is author of a previous book, “Rumsfeld’s War,” also published by Regnery.
Read other "Sabotage" excerpts | Order the book
Listen to Rowan Scarborough discuss his book on the radio at 11 am EST Friday on the American Family Radio Network.



Comments from Examiner Readers
8:23 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 21, 2007 re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
7:27 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 21, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
4:21 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 21, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
10:50 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
10:16 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 4 -- How the CIA triggered Plame probe"
Report as inappropriate
5:42 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
5:18 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
4:41 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
2:50 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
1:34 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
1:02 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
12:49 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
11:45 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
11:12 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
10:51 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
10:23 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
10:06 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
9:58 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
9:55 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 1 -- The CIA goes to war with the Pentagon"
Report as inappropriate
9:16 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 5 -- Capturing Iraq's most wanted man"
Report as inappropriate
9:50 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 19, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 1 -- The CIA goes to war with the Pentagon"
Report as inappropriate
1:30 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 3 -- CIA operatives stayed safe in Green Zone as violence grew"
Report as inappropriate
12:24 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 2 -- Goss’ reforms get derailed by a hostile bureaucracy"
Report as inappropriate
12:17 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 3 -- CIA operatives stayed safe in Green Zone as violence grew"
Report as inappropriate
8:05 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 3 -- CIA operatives stayed safe in Green Zone as violence grew"
Report as inappropriate
11:00 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 2 -- Goss’ reforms get derailed by a hostile bureaucracy"
Report as inappropriate
8:14 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 16, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 1 -- The CIA goes to war with the Pentagon"
Report as inappropriate
8:13 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 16, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 1 -- The CIA goes to war with the Pentagon"
Report as inappropriate
8:03 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 16, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 1 -- The CIA goes to war with the Pentagon"
Report as inappropriate
1:25 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 16, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 1 -- The CIA goes to war with the Pentagon"
Report as inappropriate
12:56 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 16, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 1 -- The CIA goes to war with the Pentagon"
Report as inappropriate
10:48 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 16, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 1 -- The CIA goes to war with the Pentagon"
Report as inappropriate
10:02 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 16, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 1 -- The CIA goes to war with the Pentagon"
Report as inappropriate
8:52 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 16, 2007
re: "Exclusive Book Excerpt: 'Sabotage' Part 1 -- The CIA goes to war with the Pentagon"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Surely, the ACLU will sue Donald Rumsfeld for violating the rights of that poor fellow.
134 agree | 144 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Rumsfeld had to go "he was too competent" Gonzalez has to go "he is too incompetent" but madeleini albright and janet reno were just wonderful.
180 agree | 145 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Hootyswach said:
This was definately not writen by the DoD. Why would someone write about methods that we may be using to hunt down terrorist. It is already difficult enough to track these guys down without books and articles like these. No matter how you look at it, this is treason. You are telling the enemy potential trade secrets on who, what, when, where and how. It's disgusting how books and articles like these are published and get our service men/women killed. It is no wonder, that these conflicts (Afghanstan & Iraq) have lasted as long as they have...No one can keep their mouths shut! I would like to think that authors take into consideration the damage they may be causing with the material they write. Doesn't seem like the case here...Does it? In the long run, everyone is accountable for the security of this nation. Do not be the one who blows it!
183 agree | 176 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
We don't have enough covert military operations running and we are pacifying the liberal socialists here at home. This is why we will fail our mission.
122 agree | 175 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Joe said:
Joseph Goebbels would be proud of this book. Pat Fitzgerald is a REPUBLICAN prosecutor doing his duty to bring these snakes to justice...which will be impossible, 'cuz our Dear Leader has an infinite supply of "get out of jail free" cards. Our founding fathers would cry, not weep, if they knew what was happening to their great experiment. Amazing: an administration so evil that I actually feel sympathy for the CIA.
201 agree | 170 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Nice piece written by the DoD. After all, where would this have come from, some embedded FOX 'journalist'? This is what they call blowback. It's when they put out feel-good pieces to either draw away from more important things (like the current coup Bush is leading right now against the American people) or to help lubricate some other policy. Having read the comments already, I can see there will be a lot of bitter-enders holding up the ideas of this failed administration as somehow 'inspired'.
235 agree | 175 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Uncle Samchez said:
Go ahead, read my day!
172 agree | 194 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
We need to be more creative with collecting intel like this, so we relegate the terrorists, like Bin Laden and al zawahir to cave dwellers for the rest of their lives or even better we find them.
147 agree | 169 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It is not surprising that this country still has people of this caliber in the military. They not only protect this country, but in essence, the world when called upon to do so. It is so sad that the mainstream media does not, or will not, report these victories when the occur. The mainstream media will only report what they perceive as supporting their pre-determined outcome.
208 agree | 162 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Democrats considered the CIA to be the root of all evil in the universe 30 years ago. So, they gutted the agency, and filled it with liberal water carriers like Valerie Plame.
233 agree | 183 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
You know, I think it's really cool to find out how "spooks" do their jobs protecting us. I would be willing to sacrifice my interest, though, in having the bad guys figure this stuff out themselves and I would gladly wait 10 or 20 years to see if I was right. It's getting to the point where target coordinates will be published in the daily newspaper the day before the missiles are launched. Geez! Freedom of the press is a Constitutional Guarantee but think about the mission instead of being the first to publish. No wonder Bush is reviled for incompetence. The press telegraphs every military move.
179 agree | 159 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wow, you don't have to be much of a special ops scholar to know that it's Special Air Service, not 'Secret Air Service' as the author labels them.
228 agree | 165 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
911=inside job
175 agree | 185 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Thank God they are reading email originating from free wireless hotspots.
243 agree | 161 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
u paid by FOX?
222 agree | 154 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Thanks for warning the enemy.
228 agree | 170 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Brian Konash said:
Did Rowan Scarborough get the memo that his hated CIA "careerists" were correct in their assessment that Iraq had no WMD, and was not a material supporter of Al Qaeda? Thanks to the 2004 911 commission report, available online for free, we know the breathless agitprop in the lead-up to the war in Iraq was bogus. This regurgitated book of discredited lies belongs on the dust heap, along with the rest of the neo-con playbook from 2003.
240 agree | 184 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Such fatalist comments (below)... Not surprising from such a group that cannot credit/compliment anything good done by Rumsfield, military or the U.S. How predictable. There are too many facts presented in this article from "Sabatoge" to just be so dismissive. I look forward to getting a copy and reading it for myself. Goodness knows we need something to balance out the incessant squawking of such liberal parrots who want the U.S. to abandon Iraq.
213 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
US Marine said:
Examiner Reader -- That's exactly how people look after huge bombs hit their house. A person looking like that dies from the blast -- not shrapnel. Overpressure of the air shears organs and destroys the body's capillary system by making it swell after the compression from the blast -- like how an eye swells and turns 'black' after a punch. That explains why Zarqawi was still alive 15 minutes after the bombs when the special forces rolled up. Whoever wrote the military blog about 'pink mist' is probably not an infantry Marine or Soldier, so he's no more qualified than anyone else. I, like many others, have seen these effects firsthand.
201 agree | 157 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What baloney! The man shown killed was not the real Zarqawi, who was previously reported killed. (see "Iraq militants claim al-Zarqawi is dead"; AP 3/4/2004). The phony shown here does not match the FBI Most Wanted picture of the man, and this man pictured could not have had "two 1,000 pound bombs" dropped on him, as claimed, which as one military blog stated, "would have turned him into pink vapor", instead of looking like he was merely in a street fight at best. This book is more propaganda, from a propagandist/reporter who used to work for the Washington Times (a Rev. Moon paper) for conservative propaganda purposes, all a pack of continued lies. This book is just more propaganda and tries to glorify Rumsfeld, something the military officers will not even do.
213 agree | 174 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wow. Anyone who would agree to air this nonsense clearly wasn't involved in the discussions at the time. The CIA was upset with Feith's and Wolfowitz's teams' analyses not because of "turf wars" but because Feith, Wolfowitz, et. al. are policy guys and NOT INTELLIGENCE ANALYSTS. Why is this so difficult to understand? Feith and crew were pushing conclusions that said there were operational links between Saddam and al-Qa'ida, which simply WAS NOT TRUE. CIA knew this wasn't true, which was why they "blew a gasket" when they realized Feith and crew were INTENTIONALLY going around behind their backs and briefing this nonsense to the White House in order to provide a justification for war.
185 agree | 182 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Michael Miller said:
Gotta wonder why it is that rePIGlicans are backing this nonsense story even though the CIA got it right, all the WMD warnings were sourced from Chalabi's Iraqi National Congress and NOT to be trusted, and yet backing Dougie Feith's Office of Special plans that got the entire story WRONG?
226 agree | 214 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Too many liberal nutcases at CIA. Look at Ray McGovern and Larry Johnson who were there and now run around with the revolutionary Communist Party front groups World Can't Wait and Bush Commission. Did anyone read Valirie Plame's email recommending hubby John Wilson for that Niger trip? It's written in "Gag Me With A Spoon, Whatever" Valley Girl speak. And she's leading the Langley charge to find and control WMDs. In that case Gag Me With a Spoon....whatever. And don't forget, Larry Johnson's OpEd two months before 9/11 that the terrorist threat is overblown.
179 agree | 227 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What's the difference between the CIA and the Free Clinic? The Free Clinic knows how to stop leaks.
200 agree | 218 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Like most people, some of the writers in this column vastly oversimplify the true nature and status of Federal agencies in Washington D.C. And they like to express themselves like people watching a football game, commenting like: "That guy never makes a touch down, etc.). You have thousands of government employees who spend their lives working constantly and intelligently, many neglecting their own lives, in the process. Yes there are those who act like obstructors when urgent matters need to be dealt with, but there are many others who are facilitators who can speed up the process of getting things done. It often helps to know the right phone numbers and have friendly voices at the other end. This is nothing new. Watch any movie about Pearl Harbor, and you'll see what I mean: "Yeah, I see those planes coming in. I've been watching it on my radar for some time. Nuthin' to worry about, mac. That's just some squadrons coming in from the Mainland. Hope they bring some goodies!
178 agree | 174 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Michael Miller said:
What is this so called newspaper doing printing unsourced diatribes by rightwing propaganda publisher Regnery? Is there not enough ACTUAL news?
223 agree | 202 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jim Rockford said:
The CIA blew it and they knew they blew it: one of their own had written "The Declining Terrorist Threat" as an op-ed a few months before 9/11 where they said terrorism as a threat was overblown. Bottom line a Valerie Plame (trophy wife who used marriage to a wealthy-connected dilettante diplomat) or Wilson is useless against men like Osama. The elites in the CIA and elsewhere (Media, business, Gov't/Dem circles) would rather ordinary people die in terrorist attacks than share power. They call it "the cost of doing business" in the global economy.
212 agree | 158 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Don Meaker said:
Saddam lied to Al Queda, misrepresenting his stockpiles of WMD. He lied to his generals misrepresenting his stockpiles of WMD. He lied to the UN, misrepresenting his stockpiles of WMD. Where were the CIA, and the DIA supposed to get truth? We were dealing with a mass murderer, and someone is suprised that the darn fellow fibbed to make himself look more fierce to his internal enemies, more useful as and ally to Al Queda, and innocent as a lamb to the UN. Are we suprised?
217 agree | 143 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Pentagon has worked for 20 years to develop Joint mentality, and to some extent, has succeded. Sure, the Marines will always claim more than their share of headlines. Sure the AF will always claim more than their share of funding. Sure the Navy will always claim more than their share of command billets. Sure the Army will always do more than their share of fighing. Given that, most brokers have a basic honesty. Now if only the CIA and the State Department would sign up in the effort to protect and serve the US, we could shut the terrorist/pirates down with little trouble. Until Langley and Foggy Bottom are personally threatened, that will not happen. That is the nature in their recruitment process.
243 agree | 164 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Anil Petra said:
Note the insidious use of the word "however" in the lede, a nonsequitor and false juxtaposition. Hamilton didn't say he does not support Maliki. He said, he didn't think his government could defend Iraq *today*. Bush hasn't said he believes the Maliki government is ready fully to "stand up" either. Non-story.
218 agree | 135 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jack is Back! said:
It fits. Look at the Plame/Wilson business. And the lady (can't remember her name) caught leaking G2 [and she turns out to be an entrenched Democrat from Clinton years]. Too assume that the CIA is somehow sacrasant is naive. They are one of the reasons we now have the super-agency layer above. Name one thing they have got right in the last 25 years? They got the Soviets wrong, the WMD wrong and probably getting Iran and Nork wrong too but for other avenues of intelligence being developed.
215 agree | 182 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Dougie Feith and co. gave us the Uranium and 500 tons of VGX lies. So who shall we believe now? The professionals or the professional liars?
184 agree | 183 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mark Eichenlaub, www.regimeofterror.com said:
Why is it that we had to wait for you to write this book and noone else from the media had the decency to get this guys side of the story. Getting only the other side of the story on all this is really getting old.
207 agree | 152 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
In my opinion, these guys at the Pentagon were a little naive about how the CIA people would react to, what amounted to second-guessing CIA conclusions, trying to show that th CIA conclusions were faulty. Not only that! they also wanted the CIA's own files to criticize them with. It would seem natural that the CIA would be tempted to say OK guys, you want to do a "one-up" on us---do your own work! We worked hard to get everything we have, and we feel that we have arrived at reasonable conclusions! You want to run by us any questions you have--fine. Just don't go sabatoging the information that we provide, to those who use it, to make life and death decisions! In conclusion, I believe that the CIA was operating reasonably. That doesn't mean that everything they had, and everything they believed, would turn out to be correct. But that depends on history that is yet to be written.
252 agree | 175 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree