Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
A competitive company 401(k) plan is among the top 10 considerations for people when choosing an employer, according to a recent report commissioned by AARP.
Retirement benefits were the sixth-most important factor for job seekers, ranking below salary and health benefits but above development opportunities, company reputation and work challenges.
“This shows that people are really valuing their retirement benefits,” said Tiffany Lundquist, communications director for AARP in Maryland. “People today are very conscious about having enough money to retire.”
It’s best to start saving early. If a 30-year-old making $40,000 a year placed $2,000 a year into a 401(k) for 35 years — assuming a 9 percent rate of return, a 3 percent annual salary increase and the employer matching half — he or she would have more than $920,000 for retirement.
Potential employees are looking for 401(k) plans in which a company will match a percentage of the employee’s savings, Lundquist said. It also helps if enrollment in the company plan is automated, eliminating some of the indecision that might prevent a person from enrolling on his own.
Automated enrollment for new employees can also benefit companies, the study showed.
Twelve area employers participated in the AARP study, and eight offer automated plans. With the automatic feature, the companies have seen increases in their plan participation and their employees’ 401(k) contribution levels, along with improvements in their ability to recruit and retain employees.
“Anything the company can do to automate the plan is a win-win for everyone,” Lundquist said.
There are, however, other factors job seekers look for in potential employers, said Andrew Tignanelli, president of The Financial Consulate, an investment adviser in Lutherville.
“I think (a competitive retirement plan) is a small piece of the pie,” Tignanelli said. “But I find it hard to imagine that a good 401(k) plan has any significant effect on employee satisfaction.”
His company’s own motivational study focused on the importance of the company’s vision and values rather than employee benefits, Tignanelli said.
“Strong leadership in the company is something that can lead to employee satisfaction,” he said. “You could have a top-of-the-line 401(k), but that won’t make up for a poor working environment.”
acannarsa@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
1:59 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "City faces $2.9 billion gap in retiree health benefits"
Report as inappropriate
8:01 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 25, 2008
re: "Howard considering trust fund for retiree benefits obligation"
Report as inappropriate
7:11 AM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007
re: "More than $10M set aside for retiree benefits"
Report as inappropriate
5:58 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 20, 2007
re: "More than $10M set aside for retiree benefits"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Oh sure, raise my taxes. It doesn't matter that I have no retirement plan. That I have worked since I was 16 years old, not including babysitting when I was younger that 16. All the hardworking state employees, I say hard working because I see them napping in yellow trucks, deserve a big fat retirement check. And the city employees, with all the hard work they do by shopping using city credit cards is tiring. They deserve it also! Take my money, what little I have left.
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Not surprised said:
Retirement should be in 401K plans. With the county and the employee contributing. Then there would be no unfunded liability!
32 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Baltimore County's website makes no mention of a 5 % penalty , nor does it tell you how they aren't finish yet... if this information is true then employees who have been loyal and hard working are to be pusished for their committment. If the Administration and Council and Govenment on all levels really are so worried about the system , then perhaps they should show how much they care about all of their constituens out here in the communities it by reaching into thier own retirement systems/pockets and pay into the Social Security System. and Retirement system and cut their pays.. Excuse me, but it would seem that we have elected people who have no problem taking pensions from workers who are the backbone of the entire system....yet..pay nothing themselves... I think that perhaps it may be time that government "for the people" replaces "by the people" with "real people."
159 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Howard County's approach to funding their retirement liability is not being done by ravaging the current employee's retirement as Baltimore County Executive Jim Smith is trying to do. They also have a Spending Committee evaluating the financial impact. Baltimore County did not have the pension system evaluated prior to proposing the radical changes to the current retirement system.
172 agree | 151 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree