Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
The employee, D'Wanna Lee, had reportedly been in a relationship with a staffer from Akridge, which manages the building, located at 825 N. Capitol St.
Lee did not respond to messages Tuesday. She had been paid a $92,700 annual salary under Reinoso and had previously worked for the Board of Education. Reinoso, who would not comment on Lee's departure, said Lee had worked on "issue areas" including special education.
Lee, whose permanent office working for Reinoso was located in the John A. Wilson Building, had also worked part-time at DCPS headquarters during the last couple of months as Mayor Adrian Fenty took over the school system, Fenty spokeswoman Mafara Hobson said.
Hobson said Lee's "employment was terminated" but would not confirm that her departure was in relation to Friday's incident. She said she had not seen any photos.
"I can only comment that [Lee's] last day was Friday," Hobson said.
Akridge spokeswoman Mary Margaret Hiller would not identify the employee. He is still employed with the company, she said.The photos reportedly featured the man lounging naked on a bed. It is not clear exactly who got the photos, but they were reportedly taped in bathrooms and various offices Friday. Building security officers destroyed the photos that were found.
The firing could prove a distraction for Reinoso. It comes a week after D.C. Council failed to schedule Reinoso's confirmation hearing. Chairman Vincent Gray said questions remained over the role he and his office would play in Fenty's schools takeover. Reinoso also has failed to fully respond to lingering questions by some council members over who was responsible for plagiarizing another school system's work and including it in a city education plan.



Comments from Examiner Readers
12:22 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007 re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
12:11 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 20, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
11:56 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
2:48 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
2:33 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
1:23 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
1:18 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
12:44 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
12:28 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
10:28 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
10:26 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
8:34 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
8:20 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
7:10 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
5:53 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
9:28 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
5:23 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
5:04 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
4:23 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
3:54 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
3:33 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
3:04 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
1:43 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
12:51 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
12:26 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 17, 2007
re: "D.C. fires official in nude photo incident"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I have noticed that most of you seem to be attacking Ms. Lee and few of you have noticed the transgression that Mr. Tolson has done. He committed adultery. Which to me is a something that is just wrong. I don't agree with her method I do believe she was right to take action of some sort. I mean if she had done nothing he would have just moved on to another. Atleast now his wife and family know he can't be trusted. I also feel that if he can't even keep a something as simple as a marriage vow how can any government be able to trust his actions or judgment. I find this whole thing reflects rather poorly on both of them. Her for the actions she chose, and him cause if he could have controlled his own urges and kept what is supposed to be a sacred vow this whole situation would never have occured.
151 agree | 141 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Oversight. said:
First off let me tell everyone, I am a guy but even as a guy I can't condone this mans actions. Perhaps I am a little old fashioned but truth is he was in the wrong, not her. The only thing she did wrong was to fall for the guy. Simple fact is that he is the one that should have said look I am married and ended things. He is the one that took a vow to be faithful to his wife, and he is the one that broke that vow not just once but twice. Yet it seems no one has stopped to think of this, which is something I believe to be a bit of an oversight. Do I agree with her methods, no. However I do believe that attention did need to be drawn. I also believe that his wife should have been made aware. Truth is is not just his wife he was cheating on it was his family. If you aren't getting what you need or aren't happy in your marriage end it. The moment you start sneaking around with other women is the moment you have opted your own vows.. your word.. your very honor means nothing to
106 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I find it hard to believe someone smart enough to have a $92,000 a year job wasn't smart enough to know she was being played. His lack of honesty or ethics still doesn't justify what she did. I know hell hath no fury like a woman scorned, but what did girlfriend gan by acting out? Mr. T played her and if that wasn't bad enough, know the whole world knows it. Smart move, huh?
128 agree | 135 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Unfortunately, Just a thought is correct about the mentality of many of those working at 825. That is why it is important for the new Chancellor and the Deputy Mayor for Education to demand employees sign performance contracts that make it easier to fire them if need be. And, all must create a culture of transparency in which there are no more "coverups" of illicit behavior and when such behavior is uncovered, it is eliminated.
153 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Just a thought said:
I do agree there's a deeper problem within the DCPS...why heck...it only takes one social gathering outside work...and you can realize who's with whom at any given moment, with the croynism and nepotism within the agency this is by far mild...posting of a photo. Apparently, the chick is not techology saavy...because she could have done more damage... Yet, I can see an ajudicator looking at the nexis of her action in relation to her job...and say it was a tad-bit harsh but then again who knows and all-in-all who cares! As one poster stated that there are scandals daily and hourly within our schools...anytime you have a scandal where a custodian impregnates a student but the school system hides the news...because they felt that the school has been exposed in the news enough for that school year...just goes to show the head in the sand mentality they have and endure. Knowing that she works at headquarters, she probably knew about other infractions...and felt oh what the hell!
110 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Lee acted inappropriately. Where is the counseling? What did the recipient of her anger do to push her this far to cost her job? There are teachers dating parents of their students, there are teachers sleeping with their students, there are workers inappropriately making sexual jestures towards our students and for this to happen right in the DCPS headquarters is another embarrasment. Will training and meetings with employees help to avoid something like this happening again? It could have gotten worse and is it over with?
121 agree | 104 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
D'Wanna Lee should have been fired! I wonder exactly what pushed her button to make her go to that extreme? Apparently Ms. Lee hates rejection, so let's see who would dare to date D'Wanna Lee. Maybe after on-going therapy and counseling. But all in all, what Ms. Lee did was unacceptable and I bet you D'Wanna was naked taking those pictures! Get over it girlfriend, he no longer wanted you after the sex! Hope you didn't have to pay for it(smile)
155 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am hoping that somewhere embedded in the takeover legislation the Mayor has the authority to dismiss employees for egregious behavior. Even if Ms. Lee was an outstanding employee up to this point, this bad judgement suggests she does not have the maturity nor the temperament to hold a position of public trust, particularly one in an agency that works with children.
107 agree | 131 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Victor admitted on WAMU that "HE" did the copy and paste of the Mecklenburg work. That is also on tape!
91 agree | 105 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Just a thought said:
I am seeing posting of nude photo is worthy of dismissal but acknowledging of sexual liaisons in a public office is not worthy of impeachment... It is either a black and white photo or a black dress...wrong is wrong. Yes, to be discipline is the call...but we must put into fact....is she an outstanding employee...and what she did was so egregious that it's bringing shameful noteriety to the office and position that she holds....? It is all about progressive discipline...and if the employee can be rehabilitated for such mis-judgement...the hostile work environment....hog wash...knowing the ego's within DCPS...there's probably more insulted that they were not on photograph circuit...and then again there are probably just as many that are relieved that they are not!!! To be young and horny...compared to be old and hot-flashing....is about 95k in the difference. Stop laughing its true.... On another note...her name is phonetically a nightmare which is a crime all by itself...LOL
141 agree | 115 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If I were Ms. Lee's attorney, I would advise her NOT to appeal her dismissal, but to prepare for the personal injury lawsuit that her ex will likely file and in which he is likely to prevail.
139 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
No justification said:
How can any mature adult defend her bad choice or even dare feel that the victim of her hate crime, yes hate crime, be fired for her bad judgement. She was caught on CCTV, are those defending her of sound mind? Obviously not. Shame.
160 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Wait she is appealing said:
She can not be serious. It would be better for her to tuck whatever dignity she may have left and quietly walk away. If she had not been fired, she could have opened a lawsuit for creating a hostile work environment. In some states that malicious act is considered blackmail or assault because of the emotional anxiety it could create. I understand not only was she caught on tape. The distribution was wide and malicious. The images were indeed personal and private. But the mentality of the people who want to excuse Ms. Lee for her actions is frightening. Losing her job although posh is getting off lightly. If she pursues this further and the media truly catches hold of it this could mean the end of her career. She should walk away and start using her middle name.
99 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Just a thought said:
What she did was truly a "terminating" offense...it falls under Conduct Unbecoming... Every action has a reaction...let her appeal and let the ajudicator render a decision... Yet, I don't think the mere words of "I am sorry and this won't happen again...would have suffice this offense." It is clearly a private matter that escalated to something that was personal and profane on the job... Too the person who think that the man should be fired...he was the victim...a picture of him that was personal property of his girlfriend is now being posted in a public building where he works... I guess it would have been alright if she would have posted it on YOUTUBE... I just hope she was intoxicated and of not reasonable composure....but if she was of sound stability and was acting as a woman scorned...then he and others are better off that she's gone from the system. Hopefully, there's sista-girl roundtable...that will help her through this scenario...
153 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wherein Ms. Lee's actions may have been inappropriate it was not a firing offense. At least it should not have been given were she worked--Deputy Mayor's Office. The nude picture did not show his genitals so it was not porn. It was done after working hours and the building is not owned by the govt. Her actions could not have been illegal because there has been no mention of the police.
114 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Maybe she was trying to get featured in the new TV show Hot Ghetto Mess.
136 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I agree that Ms. Lee owes a bunch of apologies! With registration starting for the new school year, parents are in and out of that building with their children! Does our school district need any more embarrassment?
128 agree | 103 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The gentlemen whose photos were put up did nothing wrong but date Ms. Lee. He did not post his photos all over 825 and Ms. Lee was not fired for dating on the job, which although not advisable is not terms for termination--so the man should keep his job. But ladies and gentlemen let this be a lesson to you don't put your meat where you make your bread. Ms. Lee should be made to apologize to that man. Apologize to her collegues. I heard they were all over the public bathrooms--she meant to ruin that mans life and for that she should be ashamed. And Ms. Lee should apologize to Victor Reinoso. The man gave her an opporunity and this is what she did with it. Especially when his own neck is on the line. And Ms. Lee should apologize to womanhood in general--This kind of crap makes us all look bad. Not to mention with her name, everyone is going to know she was a black woman. Thanks for reinforcing the stereotype. This is the # 1 viewed story on this website. I pray for you
111 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If Ms. Lee plagiarized the report AND posted the photo, then justice has been served. It is these kinds of occurrences that too often made DC government a laughing stock. Folks, we can do better.
117 agree | 117 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I feel sorry for Ms. Lee although her act was truly heinous. She thought nothing of the other people involved. But I was just e-mailed this story and it is the type that is viral. It is one of the odd strange occurance that shocks people to hear it. I got it e-mailed to me from two sets of people in different social sets. May God bless you and keep you Ms. Lee.
106 agree | 149 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
ok she was upset and her vendetta paid off by having her highly paid job terminated. May this be a lesson to all disgruntled women who was dumped by a man and who want to take revenge. Ladies, leaving him alone and discontinue communications with him should be sufficient if you meant anything to him. If not, then move along, let him be and let it be a lesson to you.
125 agree | 101 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There is no defending that. She meant to embarass and humiliate someone at his place of employment, that kind of intimidation is criminal. The other issue was a mistake--stupid but a mistake. And how do you know the person was not Ms. Lee. Victor never spoke about who it was.
110 agree | 93 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why was Ms. Lee fired and the person who plagiarized the academic plan still employed?
116 agree | 105 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Well it's because she put the photos all around and they have proof on security tape!
141 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I don't understand: why Ms. Lee was fired and the Akridge staffer is still employed?
144 agree | 136 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree