CHANGE MY LOCATION
Politics
Los Angeles Examiners
Los Angeles Political Satire Examiner
Most Recent Post
Obama vs. Hitler: The debate rages on...
Los Angeles Political Examiner
Most Recent Post
A California Election Day Prop. Cheat Sheet
Multimedia News
City Hall: Newsom waiting for Herrera to decide on Jew
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
)
San Francisco's historic City Hall.
Newsom also said he was investigating the legality of Jew’s admission that he received $40,000 in cash, allegedly from business owners seeking permit help.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Committee to meet about citywide trash can removal
A Board of Supervisors committee holds a hearing today on the removal of trash receptacles at a number of locations in the Richmond district.
Supervisor Jake McGoldrick called the hearing because, he said, the removal of trash cans in his district has resulted in more litter. Since January, the Department of Public Works has been removing trash cans, as part of a program that is based on the philosophy that less trash cans would result in cleaner streets.
The Board of Supervisors City Operations and Neighborhood Services Committee will hold the hearing today at 1 p.m. at City Hall, Room 263.
SFPD
Arrest made in Dolores Park Fourth of July fireworks case
A teenager was arrested Wednesday for allegedly setting off dangerous fireworks on July 4 in the area of Dolores Park in the Mission district, the same area where an errant firework injured teenage drummer Roisin Isner’s hand.
The 17-year-old San Francisco resident has not been charged in the crime against Isner due to insufficient evidence, according to the Police Department. The suspect has been charged with four counts of discharging dangerous fireworks and one count of discharging fireworks, causing damage around Dolores Park, police said.
E-mail your city officials:
Mayor: Gavin Newsom
Supervisors: Jake McGoldrick - District 1; Michela Alioto-Pier – District 2; Aaron Peskin - District 3; Ed Jew - District 4; Ross Mirkarimi - District 5; Chris Daly – District 6; Sean Elsbernd - District 7; Bevan Dufty - District 8; Tom Ammiano - District 9; Sophie Maxwell - District 10; Gerardo Sandoval – District 11
Comments from Examiner Readers
3:45 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 21, 2007 re: "City Hall: Daly to send Blue Angels resolution to full board"
Report as inappropriate
12:44 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 21, 2007
re: "City Hall: Daly to send Blue Angels resolution to full board"
Report as inappropriate
12:24 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 21, 2007
re: "City Hall: Daly to send Blue Angels resolution to full board"
Report as inappropriate
11:28 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 21, 2007
re: "City Hall: Daly to send Blue Angels resolution to full board"
Report as inappropriate
11:24 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 21, 2007
re: "City Hall: Daly to send Blue Angels resolution to full board"
Report as inappropriate
9:55 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 21, 2007
re: "City Hall: Daly to send Blue Angels resolution to full board"
Report as inappropriate
2:21 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 16, 2007
re: "City Hall: Bill introduced to spur workers to use transit"
Report as inappropriate
11:54 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 10, 2007
re: "City Hall: Response to Critical Mass set for tonight"
Report as inappropriate
6:29 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 9, 2007
re: "City Hall: Bill introduced to spur workers to use transit"
Report as inappropriate
2:39 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 11, 2007
re: "City Hall: Committee to decide on Muni measures"
Report as inappropriate
11:53 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 11, 2007
re: "City Hall: Supes to vote on Wi-Fi antenna review"
Report as inappropriate
12:04 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007
re: "Supes may force Newsom to attend meetings"
Report as inappropriate
12:02 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007
re: "Supes may force Newsom to attend meetings"
Report as inappropriate
10:51 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007
re: "Supes may force Newsom to attend meetings"
Report as inappropriate
4:50 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007
re: "City Hall: Newsom may be foreced to attend meetings"
Report as inappropriate
1:13 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 1, 2007
re: "City Hall: Board committee curbs community court funds"
Report as inappropriate
2:02 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007
re: "City Hall: Historic Children’s Playground reopens"
Report as inappropriate
7:29 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007
re: "City Hall: Contract with officers association goes to vote"
Report as inappropriate
4:14 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 11, 2007
re: "City Hall: Slate of new gun laws goes before committee"
Report as inappropriate
5:59 PM MST on Fri., May. 11, 2007
re: "City Hall: St. John's church to be landmark"
Report as inappropriate
12:35 PM MST on Fri., May. 11, 2007
re: "City Hall: St. John's church to be landmark"
Report as inappropriate
1:32 PM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007
re: "City Hall: St. John's church to be landmark"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
with all the homelessness, aids, drugs , murders this Idiot Daly is wasting time with the Damn Blue Angels....I guess thats the way to go when you dont want to help real people.
310 agree | 254 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Waste of time by another local official.
312 agree | 260 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Chris Daly, we have better things that the Board of Supervisors needs to vote on daily issues, and that is not an important daily issue. This City needs to look at education, health care, homelessness, deferred maintenance, and the budget to name a few. Daly's banning the Blue Angels and Canadian Air Force is total BS and it is nonsense. Daly, can you name one thing that is important in your district and banning Fleet Week is not one of them. Listen to your district or else face recall.
323 agree | 302 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Chris daly is a spoil brat . He should solve real city problems professional and not with his hot head. Leave the blue angels alone!
296 agree | 373 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Daly, where's the resolution to keep the Space Shuttle from flying near San Francisco during re-entry? Can you say RECALL?
339 agree | 335 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Dear pol heads, crime, litter and the homeless. Fix these problems then you can waste your time posing and posturing on this type of political nonsense.
297 agree | 256 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I ride BART to work every day. It's clean, efficient, and comfortable. The management does not tolerate disruptive and abusive riders. There are BART police around and they actually show up if needed. I used to carpool into SF and was dropped off on Market at 6:30 a.m. I would try to ride Muni Metro to work, but gave up after having to deal with malfunctioning cars, evidently deaf and dumb drivers, and "the homeless" passed out in the cars, along with the usual psychotics. You will not get me on MUNI for all the tea in China. No wonder people drive.
281 agree | 293 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
no other city allows 500+ bickes to disrupt traffic and fight with motorists. The group has been around a short while and has accomplished nothing positive. Keep up the good work. Can someone attach their next route with their reply so we can all avoid their city sanctioned street party.
499 agree | 326 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gretchen said:
Yes, we should encourage the use of public transit but Mirkarimi is going to far by trying to legislate what businesses must do to support it. Just the cost of monitoring and enforcing such a plan would be self defeating. If employees of SF businesses are not using public transit perhaps there's a problem with it! Let' fix public transit before we try to legislate the use of it. Employer provided vanpool service would probably reduce the number of public transit users and increase the number of minivans driving around the city - very counter productive. I am also concerned that again the small businesses are being asked to pay for a progressive agenda. First we make them raise minimum wage, then we want universal health care, now we want businesses to pay for transit passes or vanpools. Decent wages, health benefits at least make sense, but public transit is a city service that is disfunctional and needs attention. Fix Muni so that other measures aren't needed.
337 agree | 332 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The SEIU runs Muni, and is one of the chief causes for it's problems. I don't think the workers are overpaid, but they are underworked. The arcane work rules prohibit any reasonable management of workers. Work rule concessions (like requiring a call-in if not showing up for work) are absolutely necessary. Also, reduce the number of bus stops from every other block to every third block. This will speed up the system as well.
675 agree | 596 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I would support this if I thought the Board would use this opportunity to discuss REAL issues related to the City, and not use is as an opportunity to slander the Mayor. In particular, Chris Daly's obsession with Gavin reminds me of Dan White. Scary!
572 agree | 399 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Newsome haven't repesented the people of this cty as along as Newsome allows discriminatio in his departments there will beno rest, remember Newsome was alos mention for voter fraud along with Mohammad Nuru who still works for Gavin, Gavin is afraid to fire Nuru because Nuru has the goods on Newsome
449 agree | 583 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think Gretchen works for the mayor for he do have a obligation to appear before the board remember that was voted on so Gretchen can stop kissing on the mayor's butt
610 agree | 544 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gretchen said:
The mayor was elected by the people of SF, not the Board of Supervisors. He has no obligation to come before them and be submitted to any questioning or, given the personalities involved, verbal abuse. It will be interesting to see which six supervisors will actually stand up and say: "Because I am such an obnoxious person with such a vile attitude and childish inability to even carry on a civil conversation, I know that the only way I can get the mayor to pay attention to my stupidity is by passing this egregious resolution." Gee, I can't imagine that six of our supervisors would admit to this, but, well, it is SF and these are (for better or worse) our supervisors. It will be interesting to see which supervisors want to be identified as one of Daly's dunderheads.
591 agree | 589 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
seems utterly ridiculous to require the mayor to formally answer questions in a trial-like setting. i think it's inappropriate, just like it would be inappropriate for the mayor to ask each board member to answer questions in a similar setting. they are all adults now, i think they can call meetings with each other as necessary, like grown ups. let's not have the mayor, or anyone, use their valuable time when there's many other important issues at hand that need to be addressed.
556 agree | 393 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
i'm glad community court got funding, but it doesn't seem enough. $750k is a drop in the bucket compared to the $10-20 million line items that seem a bit inflated. we need something to address quality of life issues. i'm tired of living in filth, graffiti, and bathroom residue. walking out the door and experiencing this makes me feel harassed everyday. it's good that the perpetrators will finally have an understanding what it means to clean up the trash they've created + what it means for to the owner of that property who would've had to clean it up for me. seems like this would make the wrong right.
1,111 agree | 584 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
ed bobatee said:
i'd be happy to pay the cops lots of money if they actually did their jobs. but they are so lazy and risk averse, the criminals run around and know the ycan get away with petty offenses, assault, and more, because no one will stop them. and this city charges 900k for a crackhouse? whatever you deserve your lousy pd. and I laugh when the pensions bankrupt this city!
724 agree | 432 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gretchen said:
Re: Article about Police contract. The salary increase is high but it's a tight market and employers have to pay market rate. Our police officers have been underpaid compared to other departments in the area. What is NOT mentioned in the story is the increase in retirement pay and lifetime medical benefits. After 30 years working for a large profitmaking corporation, the average employee can retire with a 401K or IRA which contains money from the company as well as money contributed. But, it is up to the employee to manage that money and make sure he takes care of himself. The new Police contract, on the other hand, will give 30 year veterans almost full salary when they retire. Plus cost of living adjustments. For life. We the tax payers will foot the bill. It is time for Unions to join the real world can convert from the old Defined Benefits plans to Defined Contributions plans. More on Police Retiree benefits? Check out the Matier and Ross column from June 4.
902 agree | 457 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wasn't the District of Columbia just informed that they were and had been in violation of the Constitution with their locked and or dismantled firearms in their homes crap? What is so difficult in understanding, shall not be infringed?
976 agree | 459 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
In the 1980s it was also a site for the Hip Wo Chinese Christian Academy, also known as Hip Wo Chinese Language School, one of the oldest, if not the oldest continuously operating Chinese language schools in America.
692 agree | 727 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This historic 160 year old church is the oldest Protestant Church in San Francisco. Founded in 1847, many prominent clergy persons have served there. In recent years the church was a sanctuary for G.I. resisters during the first Persian Gulf War, a sanctuary for Haitian refugees, and was known in the community as an activist Peace with Justice congregation. In early 1993 East Timor Religious Outreach was also founded there. Working to stop nuclear weapons production, deployment, and use, the Central America peace movement, and advocacy on behalf of the hungry and homeless were all important aspects of its ministry.
782 agree | 733 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Awesome that this building is recognized for its architecture. It should be equally recognized as a peace site. There were active peacemaking projects during the 80's and 90's at a time when it was most unpopular to do so. Support for East Timor independence. Reseistance to US sponsored terror in Central American. Protest against 1st US invasion of Iraq. and more...
923 agree | 737 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree