You are here: Los Angeles Entertainment

California News

Multimedia News

Ironman World Championships
8 photos
Chrissie Wellington, of Great Britain, winner...
Women getting it done
20 photos
Anti-government protesters occupying the grou...
Female sluggers on the court and stump
20 photos
Russia's Vera Dushevina returns a shot to Ser...
LA and Philly battle for the pennant
20 photos
Justin Maiuro of Mantua, NJ, shows off his Ph...
PETA gets naked and bloody again
16 photos
Partially clothed protesters seen with taped ...

‘Little Shop of Horrors’ harvests sassy crops

Jul 9, 2007 12:00 AM (461 days ago) by Marie Gullard, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: Columbia, Md
David James plays Seymour in “Little Shop of Horrors.”
(Photo courtesy of Chris Christiasen)
David James plays Seymour in “Little Shop of Horrors.”

Columbia, Md (Map, News) - Peer inside “Little Shop of Horrors,” the latest offering at Toby’s Dinner Theatre of Columbia, and you’ll find among the foliage a musical with two faces.

“This is a light-hearted, classic love story,” said David James, who portrays the nerdy junior botanist Seymour. “It is the journey of an insecure man who somehow manages to grow in confidence and get the girl in the end. You can’t help but root for him.”

Then there’s “Little Shop of Horrors”, the dark comedy set in a skid-row floral shop where an exotic plant lives, breathes and craves human blood. And, like the devil, this sassy piece of flora is not above an unscrupulous bit of temptation. The R&B-singing carnivore offers poor, pitiful Seymour fame and fortune in exchange for feeding its increasingly voracious appetite.

“It was tough getting used to [working with] the plant,” James said of the musical’s inanimate feature player, named Audrey II after the story’s ditzy shop assistant, Audrey. “There is no facial expression to work off of.”

This story continues below
Advertisement

Still, James says he is in awe of the puppeteers working Audrey II as well as the other “moving” plants, and he is especially awed by the voice of Audrey II, performed by actress Genevieve Williams.

Heather Marie Beck, as leading lady and fun-loving dumb blond Audrey, loves her role because it is such a theatrical stretch for her.

“It’s one of the most outlandish roles I’ve ever done,” she said, “more girlish and a lot sillier — all the things I try to shy away from.”

She says she is thrilled with her vocal numbers, especially the duet with James’ character called “Suddenly Seymour,” as well as the energetic dancing.

“I can do it all,” she said with a sigh. “And I’m perfectly happy!”

IF YOU GO

» What: Little Shop of Horrors

» Venue: Toby’s Dinner Theatre of Columbia

5900 Symphony Woods Road, Columbia

» When: Now through Aug. 19

» Tickets: $28.50 to $47

» Information: 410-995-1969

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

12:06 AM MST on Mon., Oct. 6, 2008 re: "Wicked ‘Witches’"

Examiner Reader said:
GOOD

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:22 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 13, 2008 re: "Performer gets risqué in new act"

Bessica said:
The government should get out of marriage entirely. Straight or gay, we need good family law to protect children, we need contracts for interdependent relationships. Marriage is an important institution. Rename the legal part something else for EVERYONE. Many GLBT on the site **bisexualmingle c o m** want the same-sex marriage.

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:36 PM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008 re: "Theater: Hillbarn closes season with Elton John’s ‘Aida’"

Examiner Reader said:
I thought it was a great production and both Alexa Ortega and Adam Barry were absolutely fantastic.

23 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:07 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Inspector’ is sadly clueless"

Examiner Reader said:
The Government Inspector: Quite poorly done. Actors unprepared. Line delivery mishaps. Overpriced. Prop failure at the end. It reminded me of sequels such as Oceans v11 - v13, where a group of well known actors use their names to draw a crowd and sell tickets. Uk. The result is a mediocre performance, in part because of too many cooks -- and some of these cooks, e.g. Geoff Hoyle are really good. Hopefully this review will save someone else the time and money.

24 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:00 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008 re: "Review: 'High School Musical' sticks to the status quo"

Parkside Poulegene said:
Re: High School Musical I just took my daughter Sharmuta to this show and we had to leave early! When we got home I took away all her "High School Musical" CD's and tee-shirts. If she even mentions the show again she's grounded for a month, and that goes for her other mother too. This show is really racist, homophobic and pro-Zionist and pro-Bush-Terror. There's too many white people in it. This show needs to be shut down and outlawed.

18 agree | 18 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:40 AM MST on Sat., Oct. 6, 2007 re: "Review: 'Heartbreak' at Berkeley Rep"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank you for the first honest review that I have read on this production. The length of Act two was tortuous to sit through.

391 agree | 338 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:15 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
I bet the scene where Macbeth and Macduff are branishing their CLAYMORES is a hoot!

307 agree | 320 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:18 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 8, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Playing naked? Not really - the main character's body is covered by fur! As the reader before wrote the actor playing Macbeth is extremely hairy. It is quite strange to see how hairy a mans body can be... His body hair was the most impressing thing of the whole play.

330 agree | 299 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:23 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 20, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Bloody, Bold, Resolute, and Naked - AND HAIRY!!! I read an article that all actors were not allowed to shave any body hair three months before the play started to look "naturally". So it is impressive how hairy the actor playing Macbeth is - he has a furry chest and even a quite hairy back and bushy pubic hairs. It is very unusual today to see such a hairy actor fully nude, because normally an actor shaves at least his back hairs doing a nude scene on stage or in a movie... So big compliments to Daniel Eichner for presenting us his great furry body fully nude!

359 agree | 314 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:14 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Good review... one of the few critics able to articulate some of the problems with this show. I left at intermission and the lighting was troublesome. sometimes I wonder what the other critics are thinking --- if you are still curious fgo on Saturday afternoons when the tickets are "pay what you can."

393 agree | 351 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:27 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Munch claims "there is no denying" that the nudity in WSC's "Macbeth" "does little to enhance or elevate Shakespeare’s Scottish play." Well, the critics at www.PotomacStages.com and www.DCTheatreScene.com have taken the opposite view. Potomac Stages, in fact, wrote: "in no uncertain terms that this is a quality production that presents "the Scottish play" in a new and very effective light (or is that a new and very effective darkness?)." DC Theatre Scene wrote: "The actors’ nudity provides an extra dimension to their presentations...By being physically naked, these actors become emotionally naked as well. This production of Macbeth is a great gift to those who have the will to receive it. We are unlikely to see anything like it in the foreseeable future." So it seems the only thing there is no denying is that Munch doesn't speak for everyone.

411 agree | 320 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:09 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Tonight's performance of "Macbeth" started at 8:05 pm and was done precisely at 10:30. I'm not the best at math, but that seems like under 2 and half hours...not over 3 hours, which the critic claims the play to be.

397 agree | 362 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:47 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Eye of the beholder at the heart of ‘Fat Pig”"

JaimeK said:
Shame Fat Pig wasn't given an actual review on the acting. There were some pretty phenomenal performances. Especially Erin Riley as Helen and Courtney Ryan as Jeannie. Very VERY good show.

523 agree | 411 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:03 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "A trifle of a ‘Tempest’"

Examiner Reader said:
Closes in 4 days

455 agree | 406 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:45 AM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "A harrowing choice at Theater J"

Examiner Reader said:
Why review it a few days before it closes and not mention its closing in the review?

447 agree | 436 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:33 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "Shakespeare’s bloodiest"

EdnBetty said:
We just returned from Titus Andronicus, the play that Kenneth Tynan called "the worst play Marlowe ever wrote". We expected gore and got it! Tsoutsouvas was also great, but Valerie Leonard was vamping it over the top. And that voice set my teeth on edge!

751 agree | 486 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:27 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "Shaking up Shakespeare"

Reader said:
Yes, "She Stoops to Comedy" at Woolly Mammoth is a treat!

551 agree | 470 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:23 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "Shaking up Shakespeare"

Examiner Reader said:
Oh, we just a-DORed this show!

578 agree | 463 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement