Council to look into van-accessible parking
Article History
There are updates to this article.

Anne Arundel County (Map, News) - Finding a parking space is not the biggest obstacle for Ronald Howard, who is in a wheelchair; rather, it is finding the right-sized space.

“There are people who park in the van-accessible spaces when they don’t need the extra access,” said the Linthicum resident, who drives a van. “That forces me to take up two handicapped parking spaces because of the selfishness of others.”

Howard testified before the Anne Arundel County Council recently about his plight — cars parking in the handicapped spaces designed for vans. Howard said he needs the extra space for his wheelchair lift.

But the American Association for Disabled People said such an issue is a new one for them.

“This is the first time we’ve heard of that kind of problem,” said Mariana Nork, the association’s vice president of communications. “But it does make a ton of sense.”

Howard’s story has at least touched the council, which in addition to raising the fine for handicapped parking violators from $100 to $500, will look into ways of enforcing van-accessible parking allotments.

Council Chairman Ronald Dillon, R-District 3, and Councilwoman Cathy Vitale, R-District 5, said this week that they want to see the rules reviewed.

Pam Jordan, the county’s Americans with Disabilities Act coordinator, said she also is looking into the issue.

But the county may have a tough time.

“There is no consistency in terms of enforcement, space allotment and rules nationwide,” Nork said.

She said she could not think of a jurisdiction that enforces van-accessible handicapped parking spaces.

As for the parking fine, Nork said the county’s new fee — which is expected to generate $140,000 — is one of the highest she has seen.

jflanagan@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

2:32 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "More solar-powered parking meters coming to Baltimore"

Examiner Reader said:
On two separate occassions the meters did not work. The first time it took my money and did not deliver a receipt. The second time it took some of my money, spit out some and did not register some, but kept it. On the first occassion the authority said they would refund my money, but it has been over a month and I have received nothing. I'm waiting for a response to the second incident but not holding my breath

249 agree | 211 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:20 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 25, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
"This is classic SF Progressive oppression of the poor. By not requiring below market rate units to provide parking, it makes life harder for the poor living there to have the same convenience regarding their cars as everyone else expects." WRONG--this measure will reduce the cost of apartments by $50,000-$80,000. That's a big chunk of change, especially for the poor, and above all for those who can't afford cars in the first place. Why should the government FORCE you to buy a parking space when you don't want one? All this rule is give you FREEDOM OF CHOICE.

180 agree | 194 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:15 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
Right on Tom, poor people don't drive so why not take away their parking. You progressives give me the creeps. The minimum is ONE parking space for every FOUR units of housing and you want to take that away. Tom, you and Peskin need to Get A LIFE! I bet that Mr. Peskin has at least 2 parking spaces in his million dollar condo in Nothe Beach. Leave us alone!!!

194 agree | 200 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
This is classic SF Progressive oppression of the poor. By not requiring below market rate units to provide parking, it makes life harder for the poor living there to have the same convenience regarding their cars as everyone else expects. It makes a hard life still harder. Sad.

185 agree | 215 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:01 PM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

Examiner Reader said:
I have been in Baltimore for the last 5 years. I have a disability, because of which my lower limbs are paralyzed. Recently, I have found a spurt in disability tags for parking in the last couple of years. I surveyed 7 vehicles on Redwood street, and found five had disabled tag!!! I have found that some young people in early 20s park their vehicle and walk 5 blocks without any trouble, and I on a wheelchair is unable to get a parking place. Sometimes it has been frustrating. The cops cannot do anything, as long as these disability tags certified indiscriminately by family physicians. Unfortunately, carrying a "illegal" disabled tags no longer is a social stigma. It has become as acceptable as illegal license. I hope, this letter brings some sense of morality and social responsibility to those people using disabled tags. They should understand the hardship they are causing to the disabled community. Regards, Jeremy

341 agree | 361 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:33 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

kilteddude said:
Does this mean they will stop ticketing legally parked cars? I've got 2 tickets in the last year while parked legally.

348 agree | 330 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:57 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

Examiner Reader said:
DAMN IT!

358 agree | 345 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "New ticket device puts illegal parkers on camera"

Ticket Amnesty said:
Ticket fines in Baltimore are absurd....so, don't pay them. Request and officer when you go to court for your ticket+fines and if he/she doesn't show (they rarely, if ever will) you only have to pay the fine + court costs....goodbye $800 fine on $21 ticket.

640 agree | 368 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)