Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
The council approved the package in a 5-0 vote — making Homan’s $190,000 salary second only to the county’s police chief — with Councilman Joe Bartenfelder, D-District 6, abstaining.
Bartenfelder said before the meeting he had qualms about voting amid a lawsuit filed last week by Miriam Grice, a 55-year-old employee fired two weeks ago for what she calls retaliatory acts involving Homan since 1999. County officials have denied the claims and applauded the council’s vote.
“I think this council fully understands the danger of trying someone based on allegations,” said Don Mohler, a spokesman for County Executive Jim Smith. “It could happen to anyone.”
The vote only strengthened Grice’s resolve, attorney Kathleen Cahill said. Grice accidentally interrupted Homan and Assistant County Attorney Suzanne Berger in her office after hours, according to the lawsuit, which doesn’t detail the “illicit encounter.”
Legislators emphasized they did not want to prejudge the allegations against Homan.
“People are quick to condemn,” said Council Chairman Sam Moxley, D-District 1.
“I believe Fred Homan has done a very good job as our fiscal watchdog. If something comes of the lawsuit, I think it’s the government’s job, the council’s job and the county executive’s job to review it then,” he said.
Councilman Vince Gardina, D-District 5, was not present for the vote, but has said he did not support Homan’s raise based on recent cuts to general employees’ health care and pension benefits. Councilman Bryan McIntire, R-District 3, wanted to table the matter until the lawsuit is resolved.
After the vote, several people in the packed council chambers applauded.
Others groaned.
“I am outraged no one would take a stand against this,” Kimberly Colwell said to the council. “I think it will open the eyes of Baltimore County citizens, but more importantly, its registered voters.”
23 PERCENT RAISE
» Fred Homan’s previous salary as county budget director: $154,000
» New salary as county administrative officer: $190,000
» Amount of raise: $36,000
jmalarkey@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
2:19 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008 re: "Union: Suspend Baltimore Co.'s Homan"
Report as inappropriate
11:19 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
4:12 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
11:56 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
11:28 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
5:20 AM MST on Sat., Mar. 29, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
2:25 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
1:47 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
12:43 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
12:41 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
12:35 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
9:14 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
3:49 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
9:07 PM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
7:26 PM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
2:40 PM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
12:44 PM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
12:01 PM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
11:58 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
11:15 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
6:49 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
4:01 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
1:51 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
1:10 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
12:51 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
12:25 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
12:16 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
11:57 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
11:18 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
10:00 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
9:45 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
9:32 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
9:23 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
8:53 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
8:42 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
8:39 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
8:04 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
7:47 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
7:12 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
6:37 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
5:32 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
5:19 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "Judge upholds ban on mentioning affair"
Report as inappropriate
1:55 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
12:23 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 26, 2008
re: "In bias suit, duo would swear to affair by senior co-workers"
Report as inappropriate
2:20 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 11, 2008
re: "Judge upholds ban on mentioning affair"
Report as inappropriate
7:14 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 10, 2008
re: "Judge upholds ban on mentioning affair"
Report as inappropriate
1:36 PM MST on Thu., Jan. 10, 2008
re: "Judge upholds ban on mentioning affair"
Report as inappropriate
11:40 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 10, 2008
re: "Judge upholds ban on mentioning affair"
Report as inappropriate
11:05 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 10, 2008
re: "Judge upholds ban on mentioning affair"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Hey, times are tough. We'd all like to have a raise. Isn't that what Jim Smith said when he DENIED OUR SCHOOL TEACHERS ONE!
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Uncle Fred's days are now numbered. Because the DOJ (Dept. of Justice) is now involved. Uncle Fred's power hold has met its match. He has no influence with the DOJ. The truth will be brought out. Its a "Conflict of Interest" to defend yourself with County funds. Better start looking for a new job Fred. You and your girlfriend will eventually have to own up to your crimes.
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
11;28, I couldn't agree more! Imagine, a public figure saying that something he did in a public office is none of the public's business because it could embarrass him?!? What a stellar defense by the county's crack legal team... heck, Clinton should've thought of that one during the Lewinsky scandal! If it were any other county employee, Homan would burn them in the news and in court without a second thought, but he's somehow exempt from ridicule? And the County is going to pay to defend him, to boot? If he loses, will he owe the County legal fees? There is only one thing missing from Mr. Homan's life: ACCOUNTABILITY FOR HIS ACTIONS.
12 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yes 11:28, isn't it a crock?! What is an embarrassment is the fact that Homan still has a job! The county taxpayers have a RIGHT to know what they are paying for. Why are my tax-dollars being used to defend Homan? That is B.S.!!! If he wants a lawyer, he can pay for it himself. Homan absolutely despises the county employees union's and their attorneys. If he belongs to a union, they can pay for his lawyer! Smith better wake up and smell Homan's coffee or he may be out of a job before his term is up.....If Berger wants a lawyer, she can use her own lawyer. OH I FORGOT, BERGER AND HOMAN GAVE MIRIAM GRICE'S JOB TO BERGER'S PRIVATE LAWYER. So I guess she won't be available for that defense...Do I smell nepotism??
8 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I love this quote: “The countervailing interests of the individual defendants — avoidance of embarrassment and media publicity of scandalous allegations — outweigh the public’s right to the transcript,” wrote Assistant County Attorney Jeffrey Cook. So, if it *looks* bad for Uncle Fred, the public doesn't have a right to know about it? Government of the people, for the people indeed. Baltimore County citizens - wake up and smell the coffee - your government IS Fred Homan. He is literally without reproach. No one dares question him, and when they do, well, you can see the results. Quit bellyaching about the recession that isn't and see that your local government has been hijacked by this non-elected tyrant.
7 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is nothing new in Baltimore County.A fire Battalion Chief and Captain were forced to retire and Fire Specialist were terminated in the past month for this.Fred Hohman made this happen.(As I say,not as I do)Mr.Smith has a group of politically motivated foot soldiers(county administator,fire chief,asst fire chief,chief of staff,and the list goes on.If you really want a story,investigate how many Baltimore County employees have been terminated and then paid off with settlements at the wim of Mr.Hohman.
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The teachers cant get a raise but Fred Homan can get a$ 40,000 a year raise and free legal bills paid for by the hard working citizens of Baltimore County.
11 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
In his dreams
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There is only one person under Homan, and she is a co-defendant in the lawsuit.
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Fridley Wallheimer, Smith has known everything from the start. He thinks that if he is out cutting ribbons or digging a hole with a golden shovel that all of his internal problems will just....go away....
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
County Employee said:
I guess everyone who is against Grice works under Fred Homan.
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
AA Resident, this has nothing to do with what Grice knew about Homan and Berger's onsite sexual escapades. It's about what Homan and Berger did to her for finding out! When you can't attack the facts, attack the witness???
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Another Examiner Reader said:
You're saying frivolous.What part of this is frivolous, 9:07? How is there a moral gap on frivolous suits? I am having a problem understanding what you are saying?
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Only in your dreams 7:26, will our government fill the moral gaps on frinilous law suits. Don't you think our tax money could go to more important issues. Your conscience should bother you all. That is the moral of the story. Life is not worth living, if you live in fear.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Another Examiner Reader said:
It is past time for the County Council to step up and pull the trigger. How many more times will the taxpayers be made to pay for these types of misdeeds. When does a local government entity decide they have had enough of the shenanigans and rid themselves of the problem. If they don't want to solve the problem, i.e. giving our money away to pay for reckless behavior, than they are part of that problem. the voters will then be part of the solution when they decide to pull a new lever this next election cycle. Time to cut losses and fill the moral gap.
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Another reason to fire Homan for usurpig his fiduciary duty to the county by paying out millions of dollars over the years to clean up his messes. Homan and Berger, as addmitted by the county as to having an affair, will once again make the county pay out tax dollars to clean up their mess. Really; it is time to get rid of Homan and Berger.
8 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
With all the foreclosures, you would think our taxes could go to something more important. Demand government accountability and fiscal responsibility. Audit your government today. It only takes a couple of minuts to demand America stand up for their rights.
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
Again, my tax money is wasted on a friviolous suit. Pull out the handbook. Lock up the guilty.
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
AA Resident said:
Somehow, its all about money. A settlement is either going to occur or not. Who cares who knows if these two had an affair. We can not make that the issue. What we need is, is to open Grices employee record of pink slips as public record. Show everyone a copy adn put her bias money loving arse in the slammer for not producing stolen goods. This is a federal offense.
2 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I guess Homan could not bully these two witnesses into forgetting what they know. I guess the Office of Law could not order these two to shut-up either. The Office of Law can only suppress this information for so long before its' discovery becomes inevitable. I'm actually surprised, Homan and Berger are usually much better at making these... "unpleasantries" go away......
4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Time to get rid of homan and his girlfriend sue. Reinstate Grice, to former top position and with all back pay -- all to be paid by homan
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
We do not care about your cause examoner, do not put this crappy news ragh on my lawn or news box any more unless its stuffed with paid bills.
2 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It is definitely the GOP...Wait...Name one Republican in the Baltimore Co. Gov't. Oh, right there is not one...They must be darn good to set up this kind of crap and not even be in the picture.
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
Watergate, we all be sinners.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
The Watchman said:
To Reader 12:16 Who are you to judge, you are just a wanna be GOD?? Leave it to the judges with some righteousness. I'll tell you who I am to judge. I'm a peer as referred to in "Judged by a jury of their peers". What is it that makes you think the Judges are so righteous?
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
12:16 More money and corruption is made in the name of the LORD than any other party. Who are you to judge, you are just a wanna be GOD?? Leave it to the judges with some righteousness.
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No matter what political party that you belong to, the arrogance and abuse of power covers the country. I don't care if Homan and Berger were screwing on the courthouse lawn, but when they are ashamed of what they are doing and ruin and fire people that say anything about it, then they put themselves above the law. Homan and Berger should be fired in disgrace with a termination of benefits.
13 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
Must be republicans, they are the ones who usually do this kind of set up crap.
3 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
The Watchman said:
Lets see, Fred and Suzanne have an affair at work and not only does a wittness to the dead get canned but Fred also gets promoted. Recently, a Fire Captain and a co-worker was found to have been involved in a relationship and he and his boss (a battalion Chief) have been forced to retire and everyone else on the shift was reassigned to other stations. Where's the fairness Fred? How about you Jim?
12 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Baltimore County will be better off the day Fred leaves!
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
What a charm city is all that this is. Send these sick charming puppies a bone. Disgraceful gossip blown out of proportion. Can this Homan and Berger sue for slander and deplimation of character. I bet they can. People just have no clue how scandle can get them in trouble too. Go figure, we are dealing with attorneys.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
G-Boy said:
So which is it guys? First you claim it is a lie, the accusations of a disgruntled employee looking to grind an axe. Now that it has come out that YOU KNEW about the affair the argument is that it has no bearing on a discrimination suit. I will give the county politicians credit at least they stay true to form. When caught in a corner just lie your way out. Shock! Next I am sure some how this lawsuit will somehow cause a raise in the property tax, the new and shiny fall back for the county when they are getting backed into a new corner. You guys are pathetic. Oh hey what about you guys on the council what do you think. Oh yeah thats right you guys were neutered years ago just keep sitting over there with your eyes closed and your hands over your mouths and ears. Good doggies. Maybe Homan will through you guys some more treats when he kicks a little money into your districts for playing nice through this whole thing. Good doggies...Now sit up! Shake.... pathetic.
9 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why don't they also expose Smith, his secretary, Damie O'Doherty, his secretary, Anthony Marchione, his secretary, Homan's secretary, John Beverungen, Donna McCammon, the entire County Council and all of the other employees of the County Office of Law and the Office of Budget and Finance who knew about this affair way before it ever hit the news and refused to do anything about it. I hope Homan gets shown the door and the people of this County rise and up and demand that Smith go with him for not reacting in the beginning when he had a chance.
7 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
Who will fill their positions.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The truth is that Homan has hijacked Baltimore County Government, and he is not even elected by the citizens. The right thing to do is have our elected officials stand up and ask for the termination of Homan and his mistress (Berger).
17 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Another frivilous suit. Why cant we keep the important ones.
1 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
Just say what it is, illegal or not. Put it in the hamdbook that affairs are OK. Who cares anyway? Throw this crap out of court. Can our taxes go to more important things now, like stopping foreclosures? The number one priority in a recesion. Who agrees?
1 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Woo Hoo now the outside world knows that Homan got caught with his pants down around his ankles and they also know that the internal county world, including Smith and his cronies knew about it as well.
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Homan Watcher said:
Well, we can only hope that this means Homan's days are numbered. Also, we now know why Homan got that $36,000 raise... to prop up his pension so that when he's allowed to retire -- instead of being fired by the gutless Jim Smith and County Council -- he'll be laughing all the way to the bank. Once again, inbred Baltimore County politics at its worst.
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
johnn said:
this politicians have lost there minds,everytime they get caught with there pants down or there legs open they always fire the person that caught them,this kind of behavior needs to stop
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
i know for a fact that Jim Smith knew about the affair and them getting busted, and agreed to let the county defend Homan, instead of getting his own council. That stinks,,,especially when teachers, police, nurese and other employees are not getting any raises. How much do Smiths department heads make?? Too much. Its time for SMith to go.
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Fridley Wallheimer said:
What did Jim Smith know and when did he know it?
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The county admits to the affair between Homan and Berger! Their house of cards will begin tumbling down now that the county can no longer cover this up. Where was Jim Smith; and he is now complicit in this cover up. It is time for Smith to clean house with these sleaze bags, and terminate Homan and Berger for their lack of good and faithful service to the county.
30 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
Do not even joke about an affair, even for fun, even if no guidelines are in the state or county employee handbook as OK and permitted. Bacause the examiner and gossipers will ruin your life. Stop wasting my tax money and settle, keep the triple aaa bond and give us some real news like the stolen letter and denial. Give us the federal offense charges in the upcoming counter suit on that stolen produced or unproduced doc. Give us the sex tape, ya sick arse stalkers. LOL
2 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Baltimore County is broken because of fred Homan!!!
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner reader said:
I don't think that, I don't wish that on anyone. It is sad that Homan will be harder to get now. The county will be more vigilant about protecting his reputation and Homan will do the same bout covering his tracks in the future. These type of people need the most aggressive "tight wraped" evidence with no wiggle room in order to take them down. I still don't like you G-boy.
47 agree | 33 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Maybe she deserved to be fired..
54 agree | 37 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
G-Boy said:
"Funny, your tied of seeing people get stepped on but you think nothing of stepping on people yourself; so call friend, thats a joke" Huh??
37 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Nice try G-Boy but "your actions have brought the county into ill repute" does not cover an alleged illicit affair. As I previously stated this employee got her self terminated so BC records will be in order regarding that allegation for compensation for 1M. If the judge keeps out the affair, any judge including if appealed what else is left, NOTHING, end of story. As far as your emotions I didn't say it made you less of a person, but what I meant was your emotional involvement with the issue, (how ever you want to look at it) clouded you professional judgment; in essence you are guilty of the very thing that you and the person who filed the lawsuit accuse Homan of being guilty of. So that leaves no respect for Homan, no respect for you. All involved should have kept their pants on, and trust me things would have been seen and dealt with differently. Funny, your tied of seeing people get stepped on but you think nothing of stepping on people yourself; so call friend, thats a joke.
43 agree | 37 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
G-Boy said:
I am sorry if I offended. You are right, emotion shouldn't control your actions. However with that said if one leaves emotion out of their argument or reason for being then they are no different then a robot. I am tired of seeing people get stepped on, bullied, or terrorized by individuals who have 'more power'. From politicians down to your lowly street thug, there is no difference. Homan is an individual who has for years targeted, bullied, and terrorized good employees and either had them fired or forced out. I will always post and state position even if at times it appears to be clouded by emotion. I don't think my emotions make me any less of an individual. It is what makes me 'individual'. As for BC policy, you are wrong. Homan has often used the "your actions have brought the county into ill repute" as grounds to terminate/suspend. An illicit affair (now public) while in your office I think fills the criteria.
53 agree | 30 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree