Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

D.C. residents could be tagged for failing to remove graffiti

Jun 29, 2007 12:00 AM (522 days ago) by Michael Neibauer, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
A worker removes graffiti from a private home on Thursday as part of a new initiative to speed up the graffiti removal process.
(Michael Riccio/For The Examiner)
A worker removes graffiti from a private home on Thursday as part of a new initiative to speed up the graffiti removal process.
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Private-property owners face hefty fines for failing to address graffiti on their homes and businesses under tough legislation proposed this week by Mayor Adrian Fenty.

The measure, proponents said Thursday, would speed the removal of graffiti by eliminating a requirement that the Department of Public Works obtain a waiver before stepping foot on private property.

Instead, a graffiti complaint would immediately generate a written warning to the building’s owner, providing 72 hours to choose one of three options: request free DPW assistance, personally clean the graffiti, or ignore the problem and face paying 2 1/2 times the cost of the graffiti removal plus $500 for each violation notice.

“It’s just overtaking and overwhelming the resources of the government, and it’s just a visual blight on the city,” Fenty said during a news conference and graffiti-removal demonstration on the 1300 block of Florida Avenue NW.

This story continues below
Advertisement

DPW requires on average 40 days to eliminate graffiti under existing law, Fenty said. The tougher statute should reduce that to a week.

Whether gang-related or just gibberish, letting the vandalism remain for long periods of time “signals that this is not a neighborhood the government cares much about,” the mayor said. The District expects to receive more than 3,600 graffiti-related complaints this year.

“Everywhere, it’s just everywhere,” said Raymond Peters, owner of the row house at 1312 Florida Ave., which was power washed during the exhibition. “I’m very happy to see this.”

DPW will provide a do-it-yourself graffiti-removal kit at no charge for those who choose to erase the offending words and drawings themselves, or the department’s graffiti team will eliminate the problem with its solvents, paints and pressure washers.

The bill also prohibits the sale to minors of aerosol cans, bottles or sprayers designed to dispense paint under pressure, in addition to etching creams and engraving devices.

The measure faces little legislative opposition, said Ward 1 D.C. Council Member Jim Graham, who will usher it through the council.

“I think we’re getting a handle on this issue,” Graham said.

Graffiti removal

» Register a complaint by calling 202-727-1000 or at www.dc.gov

» Graffiti team works 6:45 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. Monday to Friday

» DPW pledges to resolve problems within 10 days and gang-related graffiti immediately

mneibauer@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:47 PM MST on Sun., Oct. 26, 2008 re: "City hires teens, ex-offenders to remove graffiti"

chris said:
i think graffiti is great art, the trash talk i hear about graffiti is all rong. just because it comes out a can doesnt make it bad. graffiti is beautiful and filled with love and speaks for the people who are scared to say what is on ther mind. the nasty stuff they put on peoples business wall on houses and stores is not graffiti. so how about all of you stop saying it is graffiti. read and learn more about it before you say all these stupid things

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:50 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "New law would force taggers to clean up after themselves"

Carl said:
Another yes vote here! At least one landlord in our neighborhood may be able to save paint money. Oops my bad. she took her 3 apartment building off the market because of tagging and the city bureaucracy. making taggers clean up their mess should be a given the city should have done years ago. Making neighbors, homeowners and landlords investigators take the pictures is well...san francico. Tagging is not a priority in this city though it should be. the real question will be will the pilot program last. The city has a budget problem yet gets federal funding for programs like this one. Gotta ask yourself where does the money go?...Rhetorical-we know the answer. My educated guess is the program wont last long. Community courts are for what again? Are the CC Courts still funded..again rhetorical.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:41 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "New law would force taggers to clean up after themselves"

Examiner Reader said:
"New law would force taggers to clean up after themselves" YES YES YES. But now Chris Putz has to catch the taggers. I have wanted to work with Chris in my neighborhood however the City makes it too tough on me. I have to take a picture of the tag (with a time stamp) and send it to Chris before I paint it out. Then I have to keep doing it until he is satisfied to attempt a stake out to catch the taggers. If the tagger's tag does not match the prior tags then it is less likely they will be able to make a case against the taggers. WHY ARE NORMAL CITIZENS SUPPOSE TO BE THE INVESTIGATORS, POLICE AND ABATEMENT OFFICERS IN THIS PROCESS!!! THAT IS CRAZY OFFICER PUTZ!!

6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:54 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "New law would force taggers to clean up after themselves"

Examiner Reader said:
this is the smartest legislation I have heard as of recently. it should go further by making the taggers wear orange vest with the writing on their backs, "Look, I'm stupid."

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:46 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 22, 2008 re: "City hires teens, ex-offenders to remove graffiti"

Hakeim Goines said:
May I fill out an application

1 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:30 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 8, 2008 re: "‘TC’ tagging crew member sentenced"

Examiner Reader said:
Keep up the great work! I am your biggest east coast fan.

4 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement