Residents question tree removal near airport
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WESTMINSTER, Md. (Map, News) - Melanie Wisner is worried about losing everything to an airport expansion: Her log house, family’s trucking and landscape supply business, farm animals and wooded surroundings.

“I wanted to live here forever,” she said. “But we’ll have to start all over. We’ll lose our customers, our business. We’ll have to leave because the prices are too high in Carroll.”

Wisner was one of several Westminster residents to address commissioners Thursday to air their concerns about the county’s plans to chop down 337 trees near Carroll County Regional Airport.

The residents requested that the oaks, chestnuts and poplars be left alone until an environmental study — which must occur before the airport is expanded — is done to evaluate the potential impact on wildlife and streams.

But the county needs to remove the trees — 150 of which are diseased — to improve safety with an upgraded navigational lighting system, which is not related to the airport expansion, said Gary Horst, a member of the airport’s Technical Advisory Committee.

The new lights, which were called for in a 1986 airport plan and finally installed in March, cannot be turned on until the trees are removed, he said.

When the runway is lengthened, the lights, which guide pilots during landings, will have to be repositioned, Administrative Services chief Cindy Parr said.

Residents, including Mary Kowalski, Rebekah Orenstein and Robert Brink, said they still believe the tree harvesting is linked to the expansion.

“I believe that they are using these upgraded lights as an excuse to come in and start cutting the trees down,” Kowalski said.

For Wisner, the uncertainty of her future and that of her husband, Tom, and their two young children plagues her.

She said she figures her family will move to Pennsylvania, where houses are cheaper, but her children will have to switch schools.

“In the back of my head I guess I realized that there could be an airport expansion, but I just didn’t expect them to start cutting down trees without looking into the environmental impact,” she said.

kvolkmann@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

8:25 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 re: "BWI struggles as international magnet"

Examiner Reader said:
The most obvious reason why Maryland cannot attract international business is that the state beurcacrats, most of who come from the hick town Baltimore, refuse to even acknowledge the Nation's Capital which is enaces by Maryland by three sides. The state may have changed the name of the only state-run airport to include Washington, but that's as far as the politicians go. In Maryland, everything is about Baltimore, despite the true economic engine of the state being Montgomery County, which is struggling to compete with Northern Virginia, a region with a huge international business center. Maryland has failed in so many ways. It's a hick state through and through.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:51 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 8, 2007 re: "Airport meeting disappoints"

Examiner Reader said:
Mr. Rau makes some good points, however his references to noise and property values at the Greensboro airport are not a good comparison to the situation in Carroll County. Greensboro is an international airport with regular commercial passenger flights. That is not and will not be the case here.

176 agree | 198 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:21 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 8, 2007 re: "Airport meeting disappoints"

Examiner Reader said:
This airport issue is NOT about accepting the FACT that Westminster is growing. It actually has little to do with the growth of Westminster. Did the last expansion "boost" enormous growth for Westminster? Corporations can currently use CCRA without an expansion. Remember - its already a safe airport at its current size - this airport has a good safety record now - let's get other current issues cleaned up before even considering adding more!

203 agree | 181 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:59 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007 re: "Airport expansion plan doesn’t fly with some county residents"

Jodi Siu said:
There are also Carroll residents that want to see the expansion. I think it is a great thing! It will be safer for our many pilots in the county and quieter for those close to the airport. Growth is a good think any people should accept the fact that Westminster is growing.

311 agree | 239 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:23 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"

George Grubby said:
I have no tolerence for public official or citizens who speak out against abusive spending and taxes untill they stand to be on the receiving end of such funds. Yes, most likly if we do not accept these funds they will go somewhere else, however it is that attitude which fuels the perpetual motion of ever rising taxes. I urge or commisioners to live up to their conservative principals and say no to the temptation of federal money and not to forfiet values for value.

218 agree | 221 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:22 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"

lisa said:
I moved to carroll county to get away from the noise. Please leave things the way they are. the citizens of carroll county should speak not the government

193 agree | 197 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:09 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"

Examiner Reader said:
I also sent a letter. Why was I not mentioned as one of the nine? Is the opposition being hidden? NO AIRPORT EXPANSION. The citizens are against the Expansion. Commissioners, represent the people.

208 agree | 203 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:11 PM MST on Thu., May. 31, 2007 re: "New anti-expansion group demands delay of airport vote"

Examiner Reader said:
I ran across your stories on the internet while looking for help for our town's opposition to the airport expansion. I live around the Crisfield-Somerset Cty Airport in Crisfield, MD. Our county (Somerset) had an Environmental Assessment done by URS (May 2007)- as a result of this study the county wants to take 3 homes/33 acres of trees/8 acres of wetlands. WE ARE IN AN UPROAR over this. We are a very small town with a very small airport. We do not need an increase in the amt of planes, in size of planes & noise. 80% of residents around airport are retired or close to it. We have 700 signatures on our petition, we sent copies to FAA, URS, local, state & federal politicians. As a result of this, a public hearing is planned for us to speak against this expansion. You should be afforded the same opportunity as us. Contact your commissioners. We have just taken the next step closer to winning, but who knows what are real chances are. I wish you all luck. M. Atkins

222 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:09 PM MST on Thu., May. 31, 2007 re: "New anti-expansion group demands delay of airport vote"

Examiner Reader said:
Perhaps the Commissioners need a pay raise. 45K would make anyone fight the system. Lets get three new Commissioners and give them a pay raise to lead this County for the people. We voted for these and we need a new batch.

207 agree | 186 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:47 AM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Airport’s runway plan threatens asphalt plant"

Examiner Reader said:
To set the record straight: My family has been near the airport for almost 50 years. We didn't "buy" a house near the airport. We were here before the airport. I have spoken to many others who say they were told by the county there were no plans for expansion. One woman said she even went to the planning department and checked before she bought her house. If the county wants to expand the airport, they should not have allowed (and continue to allow) so many housing developments near the airport. Where is proper "Land Use Planning"? The County's claims that "airport users" will pay for the expansion costs is nonsense. It is the taxpayers who will pay. There is no hard and fast line between the Carroll County Airport Enterprise Fund and county taxpayers' general fund. Watch the numbers. This year the new hangars show up in the "Privately Funded" column. Watch what happens next year. Mysteriously, those numbers will drift back into the "County-funded" column.

462 agree | 213 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:41 AM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007 re: "Qatar Airways, others, offering new flights to Dulles"

Anti-NIMBI said:
Wow, what can I say; if not having airplanes fly over your deck while you sip your martini is important to you, maybe next time don't buy a house near an airport.

430 agree | 236 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:59 PM MST on Wed., May. 23, 2007 re: "FAA taking steps to reduce airplane noise after complaints"

Las Vegas resident said:
Recently the FAA has imposed a new flight path over a large amount of homes in west Las Vegas. They said there would be no compromise or restrictions. I came across this article and it tells me the FAA are hypocrites! Being the fastest growing city for the last 25 years the quality of life has gotten worse with traffic, crime, and now massive jet planes flying over my house from 6 A.M. to 1 A.M. You are lucky to get some kind of compromise with the FAA.

215 agree | 206 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:36 AM MST on Mon., May. 21, 2007 re: "Anti-expansion group submits petition"

Examiner Reader said:
The citizens of Carroll County truly need to be heard and taken seriously in this issue. This proposed expansion is not in the best interest of the county's loyal citizens. This proposed expansion has no justification to economically sound. This proposed expansion has no benefit for the county's own citizens who strive to make Carroll County a great place to live! Keep Carroll County Beautiful!

232 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:14 AM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "FAA taking steps to reduce airplane noise after complaints"

residents being ignored said:
If i came to your house and did loops around it on my dirt bike you would call the police and i would be in trouble for noise and property damage.what police do we call for your noise and property damage? i cant stand the noise or turbulance in the past 3 years,nothing has been done about it,the cracks in my ceilings and walls are getting bigger,it wakes me up in the middle of the night.we can not open our windows here.not to mention the health and saftey issues..no one has paid for any sound proofing yet.before this plan is even thinkable you should take care of the damage that is already caused to tinicum.BEFORE IT GOES ANY FURTHER.

238 agree | 217 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.16 seconds)