Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Michael Worsham argued that not leaving a phone number to call and be removed from the call list violated the state and federal Telephone Consumer Protection Acts. Those laws require any solicitation call to someone’s home to provide the name of the caller, whom the call is being made for and contact information, according to the Federal Communications Commission.
The court ruled that campaign committees made the calls, and that the candidates are separate entities that are not responsible.
“The plaintiff’s argument is akin to an actor in an advertisement being held responsible for an FCC violation, not the television network, advertising agency or corporation responsible for the advertisement,” according to court documents.
Worsham filed suit in Harford County Circuit Court last Nov. 6 against County Executive David Craig; then-Gov. Robert Ehrlich and running mate Kristin Cox; Harford Clerk of the Circuit Court James Reilly; and Common Sense Ohio, which made calls for Michael Steele’s Senate campaign.
Since then, Worsham added to the lawsuit presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, who spoke on behalf of Ehrlich and Cox, and Freeeats.com, an organization based in Northern Virginia that solicits for candidates.
Ehrlich and Craig first filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit, but dropped them after Giuliani filed one May 1.
“He had better lawyers than the others,” Worsham previously told The Examiner about Giuliani.
“I’m still evaluating the opinion and deciding what I might do next,” Worsham said Wednesday. He declined to elaborate.
All defendants were Republicans.
Worsham contributed $475 to five Democratic candidates’ campaigns in the past five years, including Gov. Martin O’Malley’s, according to the National Center for the Study of Elections.
Ehrlich’s spokesman did not return a call for comment, and Craig’s declined to comment.
msilvestri@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
11:33 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007 re: "Lawsuit: Grice fired after seeing ‘illicit’ encounter"
I KNOW all about retaliation, I went through it myself. It caused me NUMEROUS health problems. The every-day stress of being bullied and abused on the job takes such a toll on you physically and mentally that you eventually break down. If you are not IN-THE-CLICK, you do Not fit in and no matter how hard you work, or how dedicated you are to your job you WILL eventually be forced out. I dealt with this problem for more than 10 years. Stripped of seniority and humiliated, I was eventually forced to leave my job. So to anybody that says these things do not happen, you are WRONG. They do. And if you think your local unions can help you, you are WRONG again. I was in one that was "supposedly" fighting for me. The administrators change the rules to suit themselves. And there is nothing you can do about it.
192 agree | 144 disagree
Report as inappropriate
11:26 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007
re: "Lawsuit: Grice fired after seeing ‘illicit’ encounter"
Report as inappropriate
11:16 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007
re: "Lawsuit: Grice fired after seeing ‘illicit’ encounter"
Report as inappropriate
11:06 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007
re: "Lawsuit: Grice fired after seeing ‘illicit’ encounter"
Report as inappropriate
10:25 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007
re: "Lawsuit: Grice fired after seeing ‘illicit’ encounter"
Report as inappropriate
10:23 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007
re: "Lawsuit: Grice fired after seeing ‘illicit’ encounter"
Report as inappropriate
8:22 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007
re: "Lawsuit: Grice fired after seeing ‘illicit’ encounter"
Report as inappropriate
7:25 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007
re: "Lawsuit: Grice fired after seeing ‘illicit’ encounter"
Report as inappropriate
5:26 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007
re: "Lawsuit: Employee fired after disrupting ‘illicit’ encounter"
Report as inappropriate
2:33 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
12:48 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
11:03 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 25, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
6:02 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
12:20 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
10:21 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 19, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
11:10 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 19, 2007
re: "Woman files $550K lawsuit against retailer"
Report as inappropriate
8:25 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 19, 2007
re: "Woman files $550K lawsuit against retailer"
Report as inappropriate
6:59 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 19, 2007
re: "Woman files $550K lawsuit against retailer"
Report as inappropriate
6:57 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 19, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
6:21 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 19, 2007
re: "Woman files $550K lawsuit against retailer"
Report as inappropriate
7:49 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 18, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
11:41 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 16, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
6:54 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 16, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
6:47 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 16, 2007
re: "Judge suing cleaners says he's on a mission"
Report as inappropriate
3:04 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 16, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
2:47 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 16, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
2:41 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 16, 2007
re: "Judge suing cleaners says he's on a mission"
Report as inappropriate
12:20 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 16, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
9:31 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 16, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
3:36 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
3:06 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
3:05 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
12:58 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
12:32 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
7:01 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
6:58 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
6:21 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007
re: "Pants lawsuit could cost D.C. judge his $100,000 job"
Report as inappropriate
4:57 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 14, 2007
re: "Judge suing cleaners says he's on a mission"
Report as inappropriate
10:39 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007
re: "Judge suing dry cleaner says he is performing public service"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Fred Homan has ruled in Baltimore County too long with too much unrestrained power. Executive Smith should immediately terminate Homan, settle with the plaintiff and bring in someone new from outside the County with experience and integrity.
177 agree | 144 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The county should re-instate Ms.Grice and ante up the money. This is going to snowball and leave some nasty bodies along the way. Everyone knows how corrupt the county is going all the way back to Spiro (money is in the bag) Agnew. If I were Jim Smith I'd cut Homan loose and give the job to someone that respect the office and title. Homan probably has dirt on Jim Smith,so he can't let him go. Bring back Teddy V.
185 agree | 163 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
For the County and the County Executive to say that they were not aware of this long standing relationship between Homan and Berger that is completely false. Homan has long interfered with the running of the County Law Office and now fancies himself Jr. County Executive.
197 agree | 127 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The allegations in the suit are likely the tip of an iceberg. Perhaps the Council should delay giving this guy a $40,000 raise and a 4 year term in office???
202 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I think Jayne Miller needs to do an in-depth investigation on Fred Homan AND JIM SMITH.
199 agree | 174 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What was Ms. Grice thinking? When she walked in in Homan and Berger using her office as like a cheap motel, she should have submitted her two week notice on the spot. Everyone in county government knows that you can't cross Fred Homan and survive.
199 agree | 137 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let's hope the court system takes a sizable chunk out of Homan's pocket on this one. As the Boss Hog of Baltimore County government he has always had his way and has always been untouchable within the county system. If you think Jim Smith runs the county you'd be dead wrong. The most likely senerio in this matter will be a sizable settlement with taxpayer money and a early retirement offer for Ms. Grice. Hohman and Berger should be fired for even sitting on a panel to determine Grice's future. I'm sure anyone intelligent enough to read this paper also knows how to spell "ETHICS".
204 agree | 174 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There have been plenty of reports of retaliation in the county. There is also a REAL fear of retaliation for doing anything that would anger certain people. So most just stay quiet.
187 agree | 187 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
DC has two clowns. Mr. Pearson is one. His current boss is another one . City council needs to send them home ASAP.
143 agree | 138 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Is Judge Pearson a racist? Is this all a vendetta against Asians... maybe Koreans in particular?
125 agree | 131 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let's hope someone in DC exhibits good judgement and fires this clown.
170 agree | 147 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This guy is dillusional. A reasonable person would have accepted, and been glad that their missing article was found. If he was not satisfied with the service, find another cleaner! He should be paying the cleaner! Loser.
151 agree | 142 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Explain, pray, how someone so long unemployed, suddenly leaps to the bench. I know this is D.C., where Barryism still pollutes everything, but this man should be struck off the register and his suit -so to speak - denied. That the courts would even consider advancing this case tells much about trial lawyers generally, and his own lawyer specifically. The Brits have it right: if you sue and lose, you pay. And, oh yes, no contingency upfront money.
164 agree | 138 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
vera said:
I would love to hear from the people that are disagreeing with these comments. Why? Lets hear your reasons.
158 agree | 156 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Ambulance Chaser said:
Is everybody ib Baltimore sue happy?
191 agree | 199 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Baltimore Examiner said:
My forecast ... They'll probably settle for $6000. She gets $1000 and her lawyer gets $5000.
193 agree | 192 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If you're a nurse and you fall on a hangar than save some money and treat yourself!
193 agree | 198 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Baltimore Examiner said:
Either way, he's been taken to the cleaners.
166 agree | 155 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Baltimore Examiner said:
Why is this newsworthy?
277 agree | 195 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I take comfort that everyone thinks he is a nut and his demands are insane... I hope he loses his pants trying to take to the cleaners that hard working family... not only that, he might end up in a mental institute which is where he belongs... but not before he is ordered to pay heavy fines and that family's legal expenses...
175 agree | 134 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This shows how out of touch someone can get when he gets into a position of power. Power corrupts. I'll bet a review of his work on the bench will show that he's been nuts for a while and has generated major problems for a lot of people who did not deserve the grief.
144 agree | 143 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Will Walsh said:
Thanks to the Examiner for sponsoring this forum. Will those who have read this forum and disagreed please speak up at the forum?
171 agree | 161 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This judge belongs to mental institution. There appears to be paranoiac mental dysfunction that is deviating way beyond a normal person.
194 agree | 186 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Loyd Pierceson said:
Whoever the public judge files a $54 Million law suit over a pair of pants at tax payers' expense ought to loose his job - and really loose his pants. Shame on the judge just to think many braves loose their legs and lives for this country without complaint while this public judge goes crazy over a pair of pair of pants. This is not an American!!!
182 agree | 162 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Roger Postman said:
Our justice system suffers another black eye with a tunnel vision judge in the Washington DC bench like Roy Pearson. His $54 Million law suit is an indication of the total break down in the DC judicial system. Such a case should have been thrown out of review long before reaching a trial. Many thanks to ABC news bringing the little left in the justice system to the American people. Without ABC we would never have known how corrupted the Washing DC judicial system is. Can you imagine that the formal mayer was also in court??? What is wrong with Washington DC? The President lied to go to war. Many Congressman have conflict of interest and have little interest in serving this country. Lobbyist bribe to pass law for whoever pays them. I am sure that there are good people there in DC but it sure looks like a bunch of crooks and hypocrites are running the show!
153 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Robin said:
>>>he is fighting for the Fort Lincoln community he claims cleaners have misled since 2000, saying this case is in line with his lifelong ethic of public service. “I always had a sense of obligation to give something back to the community,” Pearson said<<< What a lying sac of poopy!!!!! This guy is a money hungry, vindictive, vicious SOB. I wish they could get an interveiw from his wife. When I read that Mrs Chung broke down on the stand when she was testifying about him coming into their store taking pictures of them working...What a LOSER. And he's a Judge and he acts like that. Scum, total complete, utter scum!!
199 agree | 180 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Robin said:
>>>“My sense is that the commission will not reappoint him,” a D.C. government source said.<<< Ah, ya think? I would hope it's a given, but then again, we are talking Washington D.C. It's so scary to imagine this bozo sits on a bench, wears a robe. Yikes!!
141 agree | 138 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Please-please remove this man from his Judicial responsibilities! His is crazier than a lunatic and dangerous with his Judicial powers We all can hope the presiding Judge WILL order him to pay ALL the legal costs of the poor defendants that he is harrassing with this crap. And someone get him mental help-quickly!
180 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
bblakeney said:
This is just a testament as to how perverted our judicial system is. $54 Million is hefty in a rape case, but the fact that this is handled outside of anything other than Small Claims is a god damned disgrace to our country. This imbecile should be ashamed of himself, and the judge presiding should hold him in contempt of court. This man is obviously a lunatic, and no man should be presiding over a court if his mental state is even questionable. If only Donald Trump were acting Administrative Judge... "YOU'RE FIRED!" But honestly, we should really reevaluate our Judges and the crap that we pick up the tab for when it gets processed through our farcical courts.
169 agree | 130 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
jekinatl said:
Too bad they can't make him work for the dry cleaners as community service.
177 agree | 153 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
jekinatl said:
GOOD! So it should be, him and Nifong out of a job on the same day...awesome.
175 agree | 147 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
He should be disbarred,and should have to pay all of the defendants legal bills,pay back the city for all of the costs of the trial,then taken out back and hanged.
194 agree | 147 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Gee - what a shame. He might lose his job. You really have to feel for the guy - NOT!
188 agree | 142 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Jude Roy Pearson was so determined to rip off, ruin and destroy the little guy that he got into hot water. Now the water is boiling out of his control, it is too late for him to get out without getting burnt . What a greedy DUMB judge . AMEN !
177 agree | 168 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Frivilous lawsuits should be evaluated and/or dismissed by the presinding judge of the case. I'm surprised this has gotten this far. However, Judge Pearson's behaviour is questionable and he should be removed from a position of authority. He seems mentally unstable.
185 agree | 143 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Judge Pearson deserves a pink check . He made himself so famous now that he may have to prepare for another career such as janitors or laundry store helpers to make a living
165 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
King said:
Broke down in tears? This man has mental issues and should be removed from office
208 agree | 191 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Our country and judicial system have important issues. How dare the judge even bring something so insane, into court and waste everyone's time and money. Shame on him. Keep him off the bench and have him mentally evaluated..
255 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree