Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Newsom testified Tuesday before the state Senate Judiciary Committee in support of a bill that will provide for forward-facing cameras on Muni buses and on street sweepers to take video of cars that are illegally parked.
State legislation is required for The City to implement the new enforcement tool because California law only has provisions for the use of cameras to capture evidence of red-light and speed-limit violations — not for parking enforcement. In May, the Assembly unanimously passed AB 101, authored by San Francisco Assemblywoman Fiona Ma, which is now in the state Senate.
Under current city law, the fine for parking in a transit-only zone is $250, according to MTA spokeswoman Maggie Lynch.
Newsom told the state Senate committee that illegally parked cars get in the way of The City’s public transportation vehicles, preventing Muni vehicles from staying on schedule.
“We’ve got to improve that reliability and make sure the streets are unclogged,” said Newsom, who noted that former Mayor Willie Brown tried to tackle the perennial problem by putting parking control officers on the buses who would jump out to ticket illegal vehicles in Muni’s path.
“There are 15 miles of transit-only lanes. The City does not have the capacity to constantly monitor all of these transportation routes,” Ma told her Sacramento colleagues.
San Francisco has transit-only lanes on many of its traffic thoroughfares, including Geary, Market, Mission, O’Farrell, Post, Potrero and Sacramento streets.
A former San Francisco supervisor, Ma also told the Senate Judiciary Committee that putting the cameras on street sweepers would allow The City to use its parking and traffic control officers for “higher priorities.”
Tom Radulovich, executive director of Livable Cities, a pro-public transit nonprofit, said a study done by a staff member outlined the success of video enforcement in other cities, such as London, which saw a 92 percent reduction in citations due to its video enforcement.
The mayor also testified in Sacramento on Tuesday on behalf of two other bills authored by Ma: AB 1278, which addresses the crime of human trafficking, and AB 1062, which would establish a three-year pilot program to provide rental assistance for 1,500 CalWORKs families.
Each day until voters go to the polls Nov. 6, The Examiner lays odds on local figures beating Mayor Gavin Newsom. Check out our exclusive blog: San Francisco's Next Mayor?



Comments from Examiner Readers
2:42 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007 re: "Newsom: Let Muni cams tape bus lane culprits"
Report as inappropriate
12:10 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Muni may start catching double parkers on film"
Report as inappropriate
12:10 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Muni may start catching double parkers on film"
Report as inappropriate
11:28 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007
re: "Newsom: Let Muni cams tape bus lane culprits"
Report as inappropriate
10:33 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007
re: "Newsom: Let Muni cams tape bus lane culprits"
Report as inappropriate
10:02 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007
re: "Newsom: Let Muni cams tape bus lane culprits"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I doubt cameras alone will improve MUNI's service. Without a coordinated effort on many levels, including cameras, I'd guess MUNI will continue to limp along.
180 agree | 186 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Wai Yip Tung said:
I think this is a no-brainer. Double parker delay everyone in a transit corridor for his own convenience. Yet enforcement is almost non-existent! The fact people learned they can do this with impunity make it become an epidemic. Please ticket every single one of them.
213 agree | 188 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Wai Yip Tung said:
I think this is a no-brainer. Double parker delay everyone in a transit corridor for his own convenience. Yet enforcement is almost non-existent! The fact people learned they can do this with impunity make it become an epidemic. Please ticket every single one of them.
191 agree | 200 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
These cameras will only be used on transit-only lanes. So if your chronically slow/late/missing-in-action bus doesn't run on transit-only lanes, then this bill will do nothing to improve service. Typical. My property taxes subsidize a downtown (Gavin) + Chinatown (Ma) project and do nothing to improve my neighborhood. Hey Gavin, some of us live west of Divisadero! Can you hear us as easily as you take our tax dollars?
236 agree | 178 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
jimsr said:
It's time we get a "pol heads" who can solve the traffic and parking problems and stop insulting us by proposing more fines and more cameras.
196 agree | 211 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Albert B. Franklin, Redwood City said:
San Francisco has enough cameras to capture the fate of a Mountain View female whose boyfriend was seen with her on Highway 101 in Mountain View, Menlo Park, Redwood City, San Carlos, Belmont, San Mateo, Burlinghame, San Bruno, South San Francisco, Daly City and San Francisco. But wait! The parking garage recorded them leaving together, while he is shown days later stuffing her lifeless body in the trunk of her car, as a friend drove him home? Hey, thanx so much Gavin!
187 agree | 213 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree