Examiner.com // 2 hrs 24 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL // 4 hrs ago
ABC7.com // 4 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 5 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 5 hrs ago
Examiner.com // 5 hrs ago
Daily News // 6 hrs ago
Daily News // 6 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 7 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 7 hrs ago
 
   
Anti-violence plan nets hefty pay hike for S.F. cops

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Amid concerns over San Francisco’s high crime and homicide rate, a contract with the Police Department granting a 24 percent pay raise during a four-year period was approved Tuesday.

The contract approval, in a 10-1 vote by the Board of Supervisors, came as the Mayor’s Office announced a plan to combat summer violence.

Mayor Gavin Newsom signed on Monday an executive directive that calls on the Police Department to “enhance all available law enforcement resources to summer ‘hotspots,’” which includes locations in the Bayview, Mission, Tenderloin and Western Addition neighborhoods. The directive also establishes the so-called Summer Street Violence Prevention Council, to work with communities affected by violence.

Newsom’s directive said that while The City is engaged in developing a long-term plan to prevent violence, “increased action is needed immediately to stem recent gun violence.”

Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, whose District 5 has been plagued with gun violence, said he welcomed the directive, “but let us not kid ourselves.”

“Today is June 26,” Mirkarimi said. “It has already been a bloody summer. Why do we have to go through three summers of this? I expect more from The City, such as coming up with a plan many months in advance of summer,” he said.

Mirkarimi was referring to recent years of record-breaking homicide rates — with The City tallying 85 homicides in 2006; 96 in 2005; and 88 in 2004. In the summers of 2004 and 2006, more than 20 homicides were registered.

Last week, Mirkarimi successfully made a motion to postpone the board’s vote on the police contract so the board’s Public Safety Committee, which he chairs, could have a chance to discuss it. The postponement was criticized by the San Francisco Police Officers’ Association, which accused board members of playing politics with the contract. The Mayor’s Office and the POA said the pay raise, which would result in a total of $63 million in salary increases during the four-year period, is needed to stay competitive with area police departments such as Oakland and San Jose. They say the department is operating more than 200 officers below voter-mandated levels.

“Time and time again what we hear from recruits is, ‘I don’t want to become a cop in that crazy town.’ So we better pay them right to come here and to deal with the political climate that we must deal with on a daily basis,” POA president Gary Delagnes said during Tuesday’s committee meeting.

Supervisor Chris Daly was the only naysayer when the Board of Supervisors voted on the contract later that day. Daly said he opposed the contract because it gives to much money to police officers “at the expense of preventative programs. I think that this is not the right message and not the right direction for The City,” Daly said.

jsabatini@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

10:33 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "Anti-violence plan nets hefty pay hike for S.F. cops"

Examiner Reader said:
If you can do even 12% better, they are hiring. It's no secret, it's advertised everything. If you can help and do better, sign up. They need all the bodies they can get.

137 agree | 153 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:20 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "Anti-violence plan nets hefty pay hike for S.F. cops"

Examiner Reader said:
How is giving cops a 24% raise going to make the streets safer? All it means is that the city will have less money to hire more cops, and current cops will just buy more donuts with their coffee. A 24% pay raise will not mean cops will work 24% better, or give them 24% more IQ. It just means their union won yet once again for their members at the expense of the people of SF.

109 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)