Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Charges against Examiner editor dropped

Jun 27, 2007 12:00 AM (524 days ago) by Luke Broadwater, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Baltimore City prosecutors dropped assault and gun-related charges against Baltimore Examiner Editor Frank Keegan on Tuesday.

“I found out you don’t have to commit a crime to be thrown in jail in Baltimore,” Keegan said after leaving the John R. Hargrove Sr. District Court in Baltimore.

Baltimore City State’s Attorney’s Office spokeswoman Margaret Burns said prosecutors met with the alleged victim and his lawyer and assessed the viability of the case before deciding not to proceed.

She said the charges were dropped “in the interest of justice.”

This story continues below
Advertisement

Keegan’s lawyer, Charles Curlett, said prosecutors “did the right thing.”

“Mr. Keegan did not commit a crime,” Curlett said. “It’s the right result.”

City police arrested Keegan in May after the alleged victim said Keegan’s cigarette smoke seeped into his house. The neighbor accused Keegan of pointing a shotgun at him.

Keegan, 58, of Baltimore, was charged with second-degree assault and gun violations — misdemeanors — against neighbors David and Christine Ayers and their 3-year-old daughter, who, according to the police report, was in her father’s arms as he confronted Keegan.

Police were called at 11:29 p.m. to Keegan’s Federal Hill residence. Ayers, an Under Armour employee, told police he was involved in an “ongoing dispute” with Keegan regarding cigarette smoke causing respiratory problems for his daughter, Sophie, according to the police report.

Ayers attempted to confront his neighbor about the smoke, “pounding” on Keegan’s door, according to police. From inside the house, Ayers told police he heard Keegan yell, “You [expletive] lunatics, get away from my door.”

Ayers claimed Keegan “racked” a shotgun while inside his house — a charge Keegan disputes — whereupon Ayers told police he said, “Whoa, whoa” and backed away from the house.

Police confiscated a shotgun and pistol from Keegan’s residence. The police report indicated that there was no round in the chamber of the shotgun.

Ayers, who did not attend the court hearing, did not respond to telephone calls.

lbroadwater@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

10:43 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "Charges against Examiner editor dropped"

Baltimore Examiner said:
How in the world does smoke seep through walls ... unless the house next door is on fire? THen don't call the police, call the fire department.

195 agree | 197 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:55 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "Charges against Examiner editor dropped"

Tony Jordan said:
Congrats to Keegan on his exoneration--wait until he tries to get his guns back from the Baltimore City Police --that will rate a story in frustration --I bet it takes him 6monbths to get them back --if he ever does

214 agree | 211 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:14 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "Charges against Examiner editor dropped"

William Cooke said:
Many of you have an obsession over this Ayers guy. You should seek counseling for your hatred.

202 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:30 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Head Examiner said:
Look, this story is really about two sissies, one who hides behind his daughter, and the other who hides behind an unloaded shotgun.

151 agree | 148 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:19 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Examine Your Latin said:
Says the Examiner, "Nolle prosse, a Latin phrase, means the state will 'not prosecute.'" Wrong. The Latin is nolle prosequi and it means to be unwilling to pursue. But, what the heck, right? Being accurate isn't important.

180 agree | 162 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:11 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Examiner Reader said:
Smoke away Frank, its your house do as you please!

196 agree | 139 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:33 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Examiner Reader said:
Ayers is clearly lying about the "racking" of the shotgun and should himself be up on charges for harassment. There were 4 rounds found in the shotgun's tubular magazine and no round in the chamber when the police seized it. Thus Keegan could not have "racked" the shotgun or a round would have been chambered.

167 agree | 120 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:27 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Examiner Reader said:
The nutty thing about this whole smoking thing is that Frank Keegan's townhouse is separated from Ayer's townhouse by a walkway. So, the smoke went from Frank's townhouse through a brick wall across the walkway and through another brick wall and into Ayers townhouse. I think the cars driving by would have more of an affect on his daughter's asthma than cigerette smoke from a townhouse next door.

230 agree | 136 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:44 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Yucateco said:
Keegan should have never been charged in the first place. If anything, Ayers should have been arrested for harrassment and child endangerment. I would never go to "confront" a neighbor while holding my child in my arms. And if I was so concerned about air quality, I wouldn't be living in the city. The only nut-job here is Ayers. And he's a big hypocrite, to boot. Thank goodness there's at least a little sensibility in Baltimore that the charges against Keegan were dropped.

192 agree | 155 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:07 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Examiner Reader said:
Ayers is in the wrong. There are plenty of things he could do in his own home to "protect" his allegedly "ill" daughter from the "danger" of seeping cigarette smoke. He could have: sealed the walls, installed positive pressure air conditioning, have his daughter wear a personal air purifier, etc. Keegan has every right to smoke inside his own home and he has every right to own firearms for self-defense from crazed neighbors who violently bang on doors in the middle of the night.

213 agree | 148 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:31 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Examiner Reader said:
Just move to a non smoking house, or apartment they have them. If there was no smoking law set for that community then it is the non smoker who is doing the harassment. And for the best interest of his child he should have just moved.

143 agree | 132 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:27 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Examiner Reader said:
First of all, people please do not forget the man has a sick daughter. The illness seems to be traced to the smoking. What parent would not want to speak the individual causing the problem. Second, the man surely knew he had a gun. He was able to tell police who believed him as in the previous article, how could he know if the hear did not hear it? This seems to be selective prosecution. I thought we want citizens to be and feel protected. How do you think Ayers feels now? A person can pose as a threat and nothing will be done. Feeling safe Baltimore? Federal Hill where is your outrage?

117 agree | 164 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:11 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Examiner Reader said:
Police should investigate first and arrest later. No one should be arrested until full reasonable and probable cause has been fully established by a prior investigation. Just getting Keegan arrested has filled Ayres real agenda.

199 agree | 156 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:21 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Examine This said:
I could not agree more with the person below. As for the editor, what a jerk. He's working in the right place.

189 agree | 141 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:11 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Baltimore Examiner said:
This is the first time I've seen the Examiner print a complete story about dropped charges, after they have printed a story about an arrest. Usually, we see the names of individuals that are arrested (read by neighbors and coworkers who may assume the individual is guilty)and no followup about how their cases have ended up. Will Examiner now continue to give equal prominence to reporting the disposition of all cases where they have put the names of the defendants into print?

159 agree | 130 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:08 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "Case to be dropped against Examiner editor"

Examiner Reader said:
The neighbor overreacted, but I do think your Editor is just a little bit psycho. Agree, readers?

178 agree | 163 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:52 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "State to drop case against Examiner editor"

Examiner Reader said:
This guy Ayers must have thought he was in charge of "protecting stupidity" because his actions were so "absurd" from the start when he took his ill daughter with him when he confronted Mr. Keegan. I knew this was going to happen as soon as the smoking ban passed in the city. I'm going to think twice before I buy another piece of Under Armour clothing as long as they employ nuts like Mr. Ayers.

196 agree | 224 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:15 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "State to drop case against Examiner editor"

DOC said:
This is simply a setup that couldn't hold water. The police should be ashamed of such an obvious effort to cause someone harm, because he hurt their feelings.

217 agree | 189 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:19 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 26, 2007 re: "State to drop case against Examiner editor"

William Cooke said:
As much as I hate the Examiner, this is the right call. I don't understand why this man was even arrested.

253 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement