Machine-pressed marriage
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Claire (Kerry Brady) admires Anna’s emerald (Windy Marshall).
(Courtesy photo)
Claire (Kerry Brady) admires Anna’s emerald (Windy Marshall).

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - The first things you notice are the gears.

Gears are incorporated into the stage furniture, sketched onto the back wall, pictured on the program cover and referenced in director Alex Willis’ notes, describing David Mamet’s play, “Boston Marriage,” now at the Mobtown Theater, as “two machines, one turning inside the other”… and what happens when fate tosses the proverbial monkey wrench into the works.

About.com defines “Boston marriage” as a 19th-century term describing two women living together in committed friendship. Whether the relationship may be sexual is open for debate. And there’s a lot of debate going on in this play, as the title characters, Anna (Windy Marshall) and Claire (Kerry Brady), spar with each over everything from chintz to pie to geopolitics to love.

The flowing costumes and references to the Crimean War set the play in the Victorian age, a time when women’s fortunes were inextricably tied to men. This world of men is the machine in which Anna and Claire must work within and perhaps it is the pressures of this confining reality that make these two women so peculiarly unlikable.

Unlikable, as neither seem capable of any empathy for anyone other than themselves. They speak in a language that might be called hyperbolic sarcasm, a cross between Oscar Wilde at his most cynical and Kevin Smith. They delight in verbally eviscerating the sole remaining character in the cast, “The Maid” (Holly Gibbs) a woman whose Irish-Scots accent was so thick, it took me the better part of the first act to divine what she was saying.

Ironically, it is the Maid who provides her two social “betters” with the best advice they could receive: “to show kindness in another’s troubles and courage in your own.”

Anna loves Claire, but Claire loves another, much to Anna’s distress. Can Anna win back Claire? Will Anna’s “male protector,” a man she’s fooled into thinking she is something she’s not, leave her? And then there’s the matter of an emerald necklace, the aforementioned monkey wrench, which may destroy their lives or resurrect their love.

Deception is a running theme in the play.

“Men live but to be deceived,” Anna says more than once. Anna plans to trick Claire into running away with her while Claire allows Anna to think just that. But as these wheels within wheels turn, will this odd couple find happiness?

By play’s end, one believes they might, though what passes for love between these two would seem a marriage machine-pressed in someplace less than heaven.

IF YOU GO

“Boston Marriage”

» Venue: Mobtown Theater, 3600 Clipper Mill Road, Suite 114, Baltimore

» When: 8 p.m. Friday and Saturday, select Sundays at 4 p.m. through July 22

» Tickets: $12 general admission, $10 for students and seniors.

» Information: 410-467-3057, mobtownplayers.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

8:36 PM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008 re: "Theater: Hillbarn closes season with Elton John’s ‘Aida’"

Examiner Reader said:
I thought it was a great production and both Alexa Ortega and Adam Barry were absolutely fantastic.

9 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:07 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Inspector’ is sadly clueless"

Examiner Reader said:
The Government Inspector: Quite poorly done. Actors unprepared. Line delivery mishaps. Overpriced. Prop failure at the end. It reminded me of sequels such as Oceans v11 - v13, where a group of well known actors use their names to draw a crowd and sell tickets. Uk. The result is a mediocre performance, in part because of too many cooks -- and some of these cooks, e.g. Geoff Hoyle are really good. Hopefully this review will save someone else the time and money.

8 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:00 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008 re: "Review: 'High School Musical' sticks to the status quo"

Parkside Poulegene said:
Re: High School Musical I just took my daughter Sharmuta to this show and we had to leave early! When we got home I took away all her "High School Musical" CD's and tee-shirts. If she even mentions the show again she's grounded for a month, and that goes for her other mother too. This show is really racist, homophobic and pro-Zionist and pro-Bush-Terror. There's too many white people in it. This show needs to be shut down and outlawed.

8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:40 AM MST on Sat., Oct. 6, 2007 re: "Review: 'Heartbreak' at Berkeley Rep"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank you for the first honest review that I have read on this production. The length of Act two was tortuous to sit through.

381 agree | 325 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:15 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
I bet the scene where Macbeth and Macduff are branishing their CLAYMORES is a hoot!

295 agree | 309 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:18 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 8, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Playing naked? Not really - the main character's body is covered by fur! As the reader before wrote the actor playing Macbeth is extremely hairy. It is quite strange to see how hairy a mans body can be... His body hair was the most impressing thing of the whole play.

320 agree | 289 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:23 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 20, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Bloody, Bold, Resolute, and Naked - AND HAIRY!!! I read an article that all actors were not allowed to shave any body hair three months before the play started to look "naturally". So it is impressive how hairy the actor playing Macbeth is - he has a furry chest and even a quite hairy back and bushy pubic hairs. It is very unusual today to see such a hairy actor fully nude, because normally an actor shaves at least his back hairs doing a nude scene on stage or in a movie... So big compliments to Daniel Eichner for presenting us his great furry body fully nude!

348 agree | 303 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:14 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Good review... one of the few critics able to articulate some of the problems with this show. I left at intermission and the lighting was troublesome. sometimes I wonder what the other critics are thinking --- if you are still curious fgo on Saturday afternoons when the tickets are "pay what you can."

382 agree | 341 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:27 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Munch claims "there is no denying" that the nudity in WSC's "Macbeth" "does little to enhance or elevate Shakespeare’s Scottish play." Well, the critics at www.PotomacStages.com and www.DCTheatreScene.com have taken the opposite view. Potomac Stages, in fact, wrote: "in no uncertain terms that this is a quality production that presents "the Scottish play" in a new and very effective light (or is that a new and very effective darkness?)." DC Theatre Scene wrote: "The actors’ nudity provides an extra dimension to their presentations...By being physically naked, these actors become emotionally naked as well. This production of Macbeth is a great gift to those who have the will to receive it. We are unlikely to see anything like it in the foreseeable future." So it seems the only thing there is no denying is that Munch doesn't speak for everyone.

399 agree | 309 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:09 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Tonight's performance of "Macbeth" started at 8:05 pm and was done precisely at 10:30. I'm not the best at math, but that seems like under 2 and half hours...not over 3 hours, which the critic claims the play to be.

387 agree | 350 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:47 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Eye of the beholder at the heart of ‘Fat Pig”"

JaimeK said:
Shame Fat Pig wasn't given an actual review on the acting. There were some pretty phenomenal performances. Especially Erin Riley as Helen and Courtney Ryan as Jeannie. Very VERY good show.

512 agree | 401 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:03 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "A trifle of a ‘Tempest’"

Examiner Reader said:
Closes in 4 days

445 agree | 396 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:45 AM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "A harrowing choice at Theater J"

Examiner Reader said:
Why review it a few days before it closes and not mention its closing in the review?

435 agree | 426 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:33 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "Shakespeare’s bloodiest"

EdnBetty said:
We just returned from Titus Andronicus, the play that Kenneth Tynan called "the worst play Marlowe ever wrote". We expected gore and got it! Tsoutsouvas was also great, but Valerie Leonard was vamping it over the top. And that voice set my teeth on edge!

740 agree | 476 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:27 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "Shaking up Shakespeare"

Reader said:
Yes, "She Stoops to Comedy" at Woolly Mammoth is a treat!

540 agree | 460 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:23 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "Shaking up Shakespeare"

Examiner Reader said:
Oh, we just a-DORed this show!

567 agree | 452 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.17 seconds)