|
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - There’s an old adage in politics that one should never get in the way of opponents when they’re making fools of themselves.
And certainly no one has ever stirred that sentiment more than San Francisco Supervisor Chris Daly, who makes all of his many opponents look better just by the sheer measure of his existence.
But despite our many differences, I cannot and could not ever be Daly’s enemy for the simple reason that he has provided me so much amusement and column fodder over the years. It’s the journalistic equivalent of the gift that keeps on giving.
So let me be the first to publicly thank him for his latest eruptions, first in his efforts to divert money needed for basic city services such as street repairs and extra police officers to his own social programs, and most especially for his stated desire to ground the wildly popular Blue Angels Fleet Week show.
Talk about crashing and burning.
The latest histrionics are the culmination of a rollicking month for Daly, in which he called for a summit of the town’s lefty “progressives’’ to try and find someone to run against Mayor Gavin Newsom, only to discover that his followers would rather don chicken suits than actually enter the campaign fray. And despite loud public assertions that he would run if no one else did, Daly backed down rather than face the prospect of the worst political beating in modern city history.
But rather than just lick his wounds, Daly decided to give in to his scorched-earth tendencies and hold The City’s budget hostage by transferring up to $37 million for good government measures such as street cleaning and a community justice center to his nonprofit housing colleagues. And if he can convince his colleagues on the board that they should vote against public safety, he’ll have shown just how far some supervisors will go in trying to play political games with Newsom.
Yet, as is often the case with Daly, he’s miscalculated, managing to send moderate business owners and labor groups who have not always been enamored of Newsom solidly behind the mayor in the budget battle. And then he capped off his very wacky week by boldly going where no supervisor has gone before — by proposing a resolution on behalf of some little-known advocacy groups to kill an annual aerial exhibition show that brings in millions of tourist dollars to San Francisco.
Whoops.
The reaction to Daly’s statement, first reported in The Examiner, was so swift it was as if it arrived on board a fighter jet. Scores of readers immediately pounced on Daly for threatening to kill the Blue Angels show. Media outlets immediately started calling and television crews camped outside of his office. His stunt got so much attention that he fumed at an Examiner reporter for causing him so much public grief — as if anyone were to blame other than Daly himself.
Now, over the years, I have heard people complain about the noisy presence of the Blue Angels when they practice right before Fleet Week, because you can’t fly supersonic jets right above office buildings without causing a bit of a stir. But the incredible flight maneuvers of the jet pilots are so thrilling there’s a reason millions of people turned out to see them last year and why their presence is one of the highlights of Fleet Week in San Francisco.
And while the Navy may use the Blue Angels as a recruiting tool, even the most ardent Bush bashers and war critics don’t see the flight team as anything but soaring entertainment, which is why families gather in throngs to see them all over the country. Only Daly could try and politicize the Blue Angels and take a stand so incredibly unpopular that it would send other elected officials scurrying to distance themselves from him and all the accompanying negative press.
Yet rather than throw barbs at Daly for his grandiose gestures and get taxpayers upset because he’s trying to steer their money toward his pet programs, we need to thank him for reminding us that rationality in government is a much-admired trait and something that should be heeded when voters head to the polls.
And of course, no one should be more grateful than the mayor himself, who gains support each time Daly acts before he thinks, which is rather often these days.
I have tried my best over the years to try and get Daly to jump up on a bigger pulpit and run for mayor so more of my fellow citizens can see what makes him tick. But no matter how ticked off he gets, he just can’t seem to pull the trigger.
Maybe someday he will — when the Blue Angels stop flying.
Ken Garcia’s column appears Tuesdays, Thursdays and weekends in The Examiner. E-mail him at kgarcia@examiner.com or call him at (415) 359-2663.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
Comments from Examiner Readers
8:57 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 2, 2007 re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
8:17 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 21, 2007 re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:23 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 20, 2007 re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:28 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 19, 2007 re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:19 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 19, 2007 re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
12:45 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 16, 2007 re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:53 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 15, 2007 re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:12 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007 re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
8:10 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007 re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
6:52 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007 re: "Garcia: Hsu saga takes on a bizarre new twist"
Report as inappropriate
2:34 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 6, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
9:25 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 6, 2007 re: "Garcia: Hsu saga takes on a bizarre new twist"
Report as inappropriate
9:00 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 6, 2007 re: "Garcia: Hsu saga takes on a bizarre new twist"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 5, 2007 re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
4:43 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007 re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
10:34 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007 re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
9:12 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007 re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
9:07 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007 re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
4:19 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 30, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
2:46 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 30, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
9:26 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "Garcia: Cabbie case highlights S.F.�s taxi scene"
Report as inappropriate
2:23 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
2:19 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
1:30 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
1:22 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
1:14 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
12:04 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
11:05 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
10:32 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
8:31 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007 re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 23, 2007 re: "Garcia: Cabbie case highlights S.F.�s taxi scene"
Report as inappropriate
11:54 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007 re: "Garcia: The mystery of Ed Jew"
Report as inappropriate
1:45 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007 re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
10:12 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 14, 2007 re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
3:58 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 14, 2007 re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
2:16 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 8, 2007 re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
9:29 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 7, 2007 re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:58 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007 re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
7:55 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 3, 2007 re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
3:59 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
1:52 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007 re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
4:11 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007 re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:38 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007 re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:13 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007 re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
8:58 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007 re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
8:07 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007 re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
7:34 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007 re:
D. Boyd said:
Ever notice how many newsom stooges post here on Ken Garcia's comments site? newsom has his own little band of poll fixers who go online and post votes of "I Agree," or, "I Disagree," in his behalf from different ISP addresses. His former press secretary was caught doing that very thing, wasn't he? It's very transparent. They are little nazis who hate seeing alternate opinions than that of their fearless leader.
168 agree | 134 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Tyronne Fatsengalla said:
Mayor Newson did mention that if the crime rate didn't fall he would resign. But there was a small disclaimer re: the Tenderloin, Hunter's Point and Western Adition crime. So all is well in SF. Prediction the Homicide (187's) will continue at an alarming rate. I continue to commend the SFPD rank and file who;s hands are tied by City politics. Hopefully no more Officer's will be injured/killed during his administration.
160 agree | 147 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
does anyone remember when gavin said he'd resign if the crime rate didn't fall under his leadership? we're set to surpass last years rate of violent homicides and newsom is asking for everyone else's resignations? i don't get it?
155 agree | 165 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There has never in recent memory been a politician who evokes better the "emperor with no clothes" as Gavin Newsom. Despite having done nothing over 4 years, but look fabulous, people fawn over him as though he were a genuine hero, when in fact he is a celebrity. Yes, here in NORTHERN California, we have succumbed to the cult of celebrity. It no longer is the precinct of Southern Califronia. Fortunately, there are enough right-thinking people throughout California that our beloved mayor will have insufficient play for statewide office. Besides, with such emerging talents as Obama, Gavin's portfolio and his presence are absolutely lightweight and will not withstand scrutiny. Enjoy the next 4 years Gavin, because your trajectory in public service will be mercifully short.
176 agree | 185 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
to hello ken - are you aware that the number of police offciers in SF are diminishing in such numbers that any new recruits cannot get us to even let alone to the staffing level we need to have? Correspondingly, makings cops walk beats further compounds the shortage. Car patrols help the staffing shortage by enabling greater coverage by the same number of cops. Were we to make this compromise of putting cops on a walking beat, there would be a shortage elsewhere that would create crime in these locations.
158 agree | 165 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
hello ken said:
yes ken, we would not want sfpd to get out of their safe, warm cars and walk around alittle.
180 agree | 172 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
L. Amiot said:
Newsom is a coward to treat his appointees like this. His selfishness and narcissism is boundless. He betrays his friends and he betrays his supporters. Somewhere along the line Newsom missed out on learning ethical behavior.
181 agree | 181 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Newsom giddy over firing people? This dude is one sick puppy.
180 agree | 190 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I wouldn't call it voodoo, the fact that Hsu the Fugitive who got away twice in the last week or so... I'd probably call it "incompetence" on the part of the authorities.... then again, seeing as how Hsu has been so generously funding the Clintons , and other Democrats for some years now .. I might call it a "political favor", etc...
187 agree | 200 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Bay Area legal authorities in charge of Hsu couldn't be That Stupid, could they??? Or maybe there is something more sinister at play here....maybe the Lawmen would get more results by investigating some of Hsu's Demorat friends in high places..... there's a tip for you, geniuses...
220 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a lifelong Democrat who was foolish enough to vote for Mayor Newsom the first time around, it will not happen again. Eight years under this mayor will likely leave a san francisco where our unique quality-of- life will be barely recognizable. Unless, of course, a somehow "suburbanized" San Francisco is familiar to you.
180 agree | 180 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hey everybody, Lets all get out the race cards and have another round of You racist.
220 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
A. Perini said:
Hsu is a stooge for the PRC. He mules money to the Dems from their like-minded �One World� colleagues in communist China. The money they send to influence American politics is the cash that we pay for their myriad of inexpensive manufactured items exported by the shipload to the USA. Right now, China owns much of our debt. We are paying for our own destruction. Hsu is but one catalyst that has been spotlighted. In many ways, America is now where Rome was in 400 A.D.
226 agree | 199 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
at least we don't have Willie Brown, around, anymore.
180 agree | 165 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No facts regarding this mans donations have been made and are pure speculative. Until then, he is a naturalized citizen and deserves his right to be innocent. Stop pointing fingers and judging due to his race.
215 agree | 222 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
NO bail should be allowed for this fugitive, but with political connections that he has I will be expecting him to walk free on bail and skip the country.
219 agree | 215 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
unclesmrgol said:
The money Hsu donated does not belong to the candidates to give to whatever charity they will -- it belongs to Hsu's victims, to be restored to them. As of now, the charities chosen by the candidates stand to receive stolen property, and I expect them to behave exactly like the candidates. As false logic would put it, if you give money stolen from a villager back to the village idiot, that's the same as giving it back to the villager who was harmed -- since they are both in the same village.
218 agree | 224 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
the chinacom army has been funneling campaign contributions illegally to their comrades at clinton inc. for almost decades. Can you say ' who's to say what illegal is ?'
235 agree | 212 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
KeenPlanner said:
And watch him get a sweet deal on some valuable presidio land, and watch the presidio trust let him build whatever he wants. It's times like this that it's obvious that the examiner is owned by a right-wing religious extremist. No doubt a good friend of Fisher's.
195 agree | 170 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sfmike said:
Ken Garcia's p.r. puff piece on Donald Fisher and his third rate modern art collection (but it's worth lots of money!) was genuinely disgusting. Garcia writes, "So despite the off-base criticism of Fisher�s museum plan from the ideologically bound...even a brief glimpse of what awaits the public if the museum opens in three years, as planned, would quicken the pulse of any art lover." I'm an art lover and the pulse isn't racing, especially at the prospect of Warhol portraits of Mick Jagger disfiguring the sylvan setting of the Presidio. And describing Fisher as "a man who made much of his fortune on his canny knack of finding and buying real estate" is a bit coy. It should more truthfully read "a canny knack for finding and buying politicians and hack journalists."
188 agree | 224 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The problem with taxi cabs in San Francisco is there is no competition. We need to eliminate the medallions. Anyone who wants to drive a taxi should apply for a business permit, get a background check, a physical, a drivers license, and an biannual inspection on his taxi. Then go forth and drive. the cream of the crop will rise and the rest will get other jobs. We don't limit the number of restaurants that are in The City why should we limit the number of taxis?
226 agree | 247 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
ed shuck noe valley said:
The good doctor from the Bay View / HP is a serious, sincere candidate. But she will not win outside the Western Addition/Bay View/HP. She has one strong plank and (compared to Gavin) little or no money. But the issue deserves to go forward. The HP toxic clean up is not an issue that Gavin could run against. He would do well to adopt her position or one very similar. There is no more pressing issue that the health crisis in the South East quadrant of the city.
283 agree | 190 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
shortattnspan said:
You can see how dumbed-down America is becoming by reading the comments section of any news site. What's happened to proper English, grammar and spelling? What's happened to actually caring about how you represent yourself and your views? Why do people assume it's okay to use "Net shorthand" during the exchange of supposedly intelligent ideas?
186 agree | 203 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Don't know what i will do said:
I always vote even on off-year elections but this is one year i'm sitting out an election because "frankly i don't give a D***" The city, i feel is on the wrongtrack; we have serious problems and the working middle class is being squeezed but yet nothing is being done. We have a mayor who at first i thought would do a very good job; i'm disappointed' we have a district attorney and when murders are committed she will not seek the death penalty because she is against; well that is just saying "come to sf murderers, murder as many as you want, cause you won't get the death penalty; you most like will sit for 20 years and go on with your lives; the crime rate in SF is out of control, million dollar condos are being built (and the housing market is sinking and the average SF resident, probably can't even afford the down payment) and don't let me get started with MUNI, the homeless, the flighty streets . . .
205 agree | 195 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
EDwin Lee should be banned from SF heis a low down lying money stealing racist lyer and him Mohammad Nuru ha swiped the city cleaned
180 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
if the SF public re elects Gavin Nuisance then ot me that says it all we don't really cxare about our lives. Nuisance is the pits, worst I ever seen he is a follower drug user, and he is a cheater
191 agree | 196 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There are no serious candidates for Mayor other than Newsom. There are no serious issues for the progressives to tout that aren't being addressed by the current administration. If there were, I am sure that the Greens would be running a legitimate candidate for mayor. Why else would they? Maybe Matt Gonzalez hasn't raised enough money suiing the City to put on a decent campaign. Maybe they don't want to damage their inflated opinions of themselves. Maybe they prefer to sit on the sidelines until "the time is right". Maybe it easier to complain without coming up with solutions. Maybe they have no guts to take on a difficult task.
233 agree | 186 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ken, you are a total Newsom flunkie. You don't even try. There are serious issues in the city. And there are serious candiates. Most importantly, Newsom through his handlers, minions, political consultants are trying to destroy his opponents and this city. Won't it be funny when he loses?
214 agree | 191 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I live in District 6, a place where my representative believes that if i plant a tree on the street, sweep up my block, paint out graffiti, organize a crime watch, call the police, then I "rich and callous" and trying to gentrify the area. Excuse me, I was born in the city in 1954, went to public schools and still live here. If we have District representatives then we need someone who represents all people in our District. Right now the system is really broken. I have talked to my neighbors and the gut feeling is that we might as well have city wide elected supervisors.
215 agree | 198 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am not sure why a no name reporter finds it hard to understand that some citizens in San Francisco actual care about the future of San Francisco. And are willing to engage in the political process and become a challenger in the Mayoral race. Making fun of these individuals does not change the facts that San Francisco has serious problems that need fixing buy those who care.
229 agree | 172 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
Ed Jew has a medallion. But it must be in Burlingame, because still you can't get a taxicab in the Sunset no matter how many times you call.
227 agree | 222 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
mendez said:
with all this legal foot dragging going around with Ed, they might as well let this Jew go scot free.
390 agree | 238 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Will Clark Rules said:
Don't you guys remember Dennis Peron? For most advocates the whole concept of medical marijuana dispensaries was a means to the true end... legalized dealing. Most of the original advocates admitted this from the very start. It was never about helping sick people - it was about legalizing pot. Most of us who voted for prop 215 knew this as well. And look at how it turned out!
243 agree | 235 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Only god can save you said:
when you have to take the highway, but you are stuck in traffic. So, if you want another Katrina situation, just avoid traffic issues. and if you want it not, you could just listen to the wispers of the asphalt. unfortunately, the wispers are gone into the wind
220 agree | 239 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
any word on supervisor sandoval censorship rally of micheal savage at the radio station.sounds like the left just turned far right or met in the middle
251 agree | 230 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Vandallay. Really?
223 agree | 203 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Leadership is lacking in Room 200 of City Hall, the Board of Supes, the Police Dept, the DA's Office, and in the Courts. We have inexperienced, incapable, fearful people in key positions in our city government infrastructure. How did this happen? Apathy, lazy, frightened, ignorant constiuency, aggressive ill-planned social engineering, advocate judges, and big money pulling the strings. Without credible, honest, ethical, courageous leadership, this city will founder. Dr SS Van Nostrum, from the Institute
244 agree | 214 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is what the citzens of San Francisco wanted when they voted for the mayor and board of Supes...Why are they complaining now??? You all got what you wanted..Police Reform...Enjoy...
257 agree | 248 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Arrests-down, traffic citations-down, officer iniatated activities-down, field interoogation stops-down, response time to crimes in progress -up, staffing-down,political interference-up,morale-down,promotional opportunities-non existent, recruitment of highly qualified members-down, recovery of stolen autos-down, follow up investigations of felonies-down, decision making, leading, and managaing the Department-sub zero. community policing strategies-below sea level, and the list goes on. Who's to blame_________________________?? Arthur Vandallay, Hunters Point.....
267 agree | 255 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
A suggestion... Get rid of the Police Chief's position and let the Mayor/Chief directly call the shots for the police department. You would have the same results and save the city $200,000+ per year!
254 agree | 237 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Interesting perspective on Ruby Tourk. I hope she does come out swinging, or at least doesn't cower into oblivion or stay silent out of fear of the "City Hall Machine" If she's got something to say she should say it.
327 agree | 248 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
eyeopener said:
Where does Garcia get his information? Dillon was well liked in D5, though some say not as effective as he could have been. The supes try to make improvements, but their hands are tied. Most of the problems here are top down. Fong is a weak leader, and the mayor only cares about looking good. meanwhile, drug dealers reside and do business unencumbered in public housing. The mayor does nothing. The housing authority does nothing. young people continue to die on the streets. i guess if the problems are not happening to rich, white people in the marina, it doesn't really matter.
254 agree | 246 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
body part said:
no matter what the branch of civil servancy any of them are from, they will eventually run into City Hall politics. you have to play ball according to the calls of the higher-ups. I'm sure the top brasses don't have a clear picture what the lower brasses are doing, but if you're a cop these days in a new era, you have to bend with the politics, good or bad. whether it makes sense or not. I've spoken with cops before - do your twenty or so, get out and retire into the sunset. city hall employees are there for exactly that reason alone.
263 agree | 283 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gretchen said:
The police department has been understaffed for years because our "progressive" Supervisors kept taking the money for police recruit classes and spending it on other things - usually the homeless. Whether the police are on foot, in cars, on bikes or even horses, the police are understaffed thanks to the Supes, and without enough police, they can't be everywhere all the time - they have to jump from one hot spot to another. So, you can complain about the Mayor or the Police Chief if you want to, but the real problem has been that money requested to support police and crime prevention has been held hostage by the Board of Supervisors. This month Chris Daly campaigned up to the last minute to cut over $30 million from the budget to fund his pet projects. $3,000,000 of that would have been taken from the Police department. Fortunately saner minds prevailed and the police budget wasn't cut so we can expect more police to be available once they get through the academy.
261 agree | 282 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The blame is Mayor G Newson, Police Commission, and the Command Staff. The rank and file are hard working men and woman. Period.... Tom Del Torre
310 agree | 274 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
there have been shootings recently , and other crimes where the foot beats have been nearby (close enough to hear the shots) but the suspects got away cause the cops were on foot. I know many officers who have never walked a foot beat but sometime they get the information on a crime before dispaych sets up the call. many times i can call them and find out what happened and why and by whom. walking a beat will not get you to now the community talking to them will. you can talk to them if you drive or walk. There are many who should think about changeing jobs or thier supervisor should stick a foot up thier butts to get them to do thier job . thats where the reforms need to be.
300 agree | 344 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree