Paying to park Saturdays starts July 1
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Parking meters line a public parking lot on Monday.  The county is changing the hours in which drivers will have to pay for parking.
(Greg Whitesell/Examiner)
Parking meters line a public parking lot on Monday. The county is changing the hours in which drivers will have to pay for parking.

Montgomery County (Map, News) - Drivers in Montgomery County soon will be required to pay more often to park on the streets and in public facilities around the county, including on Saturdays.

Come July 1, parking rates and parking hours requiring payment will be increasing. The biggest adjustment — and point of controversy when rate changes were discussed in the spring — is that motorists will no longer be able to park for free in public lots on Saturdays.

County spokeswoman Esther Bowring said the primary motivation is to standardize the parking facilities across the five parking districts in Bethesda, North Bethesda, Silver Spring, Montgomery Hills and Wheaton.

“We want to make the garages and lots consistent across these areas,” she told The Examiner on Monday.

Starting next month, residents will be charged to park in county garages between 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. Monday through Friday, during the same hours on surface lots Monday through Saturday, and on public streets between 9 a.m. and 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday.

In Bethesda, the hours change is different only for lot parking, while in Silver Spring, Montgomery Hills and Wheaton the hours changes are across the board for all three categories, in most cases by an hour or two per day.

Bowring said there are two exceptions to the new rules.

Montgomery County’s two newest garages — at the intersections of Wayne and Ellsworth avenues and Ellsworth Avenue and Roeder Road in Silver Spring — will continue to charge customers between 7 a.m. and 6 p.m. Monday through Thursday and between 7 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Fridays.

“Those have special agreements that give them a 20-year guarantee of staying with the same paid hours,” she said.

In terms of rates, the only parking district that will experience a surge is North Bethesda, where residents will have to pay 60 cents an hour for short-term meters and 45 cents per hour when they park for three hours longer.

That’s the same rate that drivers pay in Silver Spring and Montgomery Hills.

dlevitz@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

2:32 PM MST on Mon., Feb. 4, 2008 re: "More solar-powered parking meters coming to Baltimore"

Examiner Reader said:
On two separate occassions the meters did not work. The first time it took my money and did not deliver a receipt. The second time it took some of my money, spit out some and did not register some, but kept it. On the first occassion the authority said they would refund my money, but it has been over a month and I have received nothing. I'm waiting for a response to the second incident but not holding my breath

250 agree | 212 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:20 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 25, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
"This is classic SF Progressive oppression of the poor. By not requiring below market rate units to provide parking, it makes life harder for the poor living there to have the same convenience regarding their cars as everyone else expects." WRONG--this measure will reduce the cost of apartments by $50,000-$80,000. That's a big chunk of change, especially for the poor, and above all for those who can't afford cars in the first place. Why should the government FORCE you to buy a parking space when you don't want one? All this rule is give you FREEDOM OF CHOICE.

181 agree | 195 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:15 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
Right on Tom, poor people don't drive so why not take away their parking. You progressives give me the creeps. The minimum is ONE parking space for every FOUR units of housing and you want to take that away. Tom, you and Peskin need to Get A LIFE! I bet that Mr. Peskin has at least 2 parking spaces in his million dollar condo in Nothe Beach. Leave us alone!!!

195 agree | 201 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 23, 2008 re: "Supervisor’s measure could please opposing sides on parking issues"

Examiner Reader said:
This is classic SF Progressive oppression of the poor. By not requiring below market rate units to provide parking, it makes life harder for the poor living there to have the same convenience regarding their cars as everyone else expects. It makes a hard life still harder. Sad.

186 agree | 216 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:01 PM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

Examiner Reader said:
I have been in Baltimore for the last 5 years. I have a disability, because of which my lower limbs are paralyzed. Recently, I have found a spurt in disability tags for parking in the last couple of years. I surveyed 7 vehicles on Redwood street, and found five had disabled tag!!! I have found that some young people in early 20s park their vehicle and walk 5 blocks without any trouble, and I on a wheelchair is unable to get a parking place. Sometimes it has been frustrating. The cops cannot do anything, as long as these disability tags certified indiscriminately by family physicians. Unfortunately, carrying a "illegal" disabled tags no longer is a social stigma. It has become as acceptable as illegal license. I hope, this letter brings some sense of morality and social responsibility to those people using disabled tags. They should understand the hardship they are causing to the disabled community. Regards, Jeremy

342 agree | 362 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:33 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

kilteddude said:
Does this mean they will stop ticketing legally parked cars? I've got 2 tickets in the last year while parked legally.

349 agree | 331 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:57 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "Illegally parked? New system photographs it"

Examiner Reader said:
DAMN IT!

359 agree | 346 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 AM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "New ticket device puts illegal parkers on camera"

Ticket Amnesty said:
Ticket fines in Baltimore are absurd....so, don't pay them. Request and officer when you go to court for your ticket+fines and if he/she doesn't show (they rarely, if ever will) you only have to pay the fine + court costs....goodbye $800 fine on $21 ticket.

640 agree | 368 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)