Airport meeting disappoints
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Residents protest against the proposed lengthening of an airport runway outside the Carroll County government building on Monday.
(Arianne Starnes/Examiner)
Residents protest against the proposed lengthening of an airport runway outside the Carroll County government building on Monday.

WESTMINSTER, Md. (Map, News) - Residents opposed to the lengthening of the runway at the Carroll County Regional Airport said they were disappointed by their meeting with county commissioners Thursday.

“Are you going to answer our questions?” Cheri Grubby asked Commissioners Julia Gouge and Michael Zimmer during the meeting. Commissioner Dean Minnich was on vacation.

“I think you’ve already answered your questions,” Zimmer responded.

Grubby is the co-chair of the Carroll Joint Neighborhood Association, a residents group formed last year to oppose the expansion of the airport in Westminster.

She, fellow co-chair Ron Buczkowski and another resident, Tad Rau, asked to meet with commissioners to air concerns about the project’s cost and impact on traffic and property values. Commissioners expect to vote on the issue Tuesday.

Rau presented a nine-page letter that included an excerpt from the Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics that said that after an expansion was announced at the international airport in Greensboro, N.C., housing prices dropped 9.2 percent within a 2.5-mile radius and 5.7 percent within the next 1.5-mile radius.

Buczkowski said economist Anirban Basu, a county-hired consultant, recommended that residents be compensated for lower property values and soundproofing.

But Basu said Thursday that he suggested that the county pay for soundproofing only because the “literature on airports’ effect on property values is ambiguous.”

The airport, which caters to private and corporate jets, caught the attention of the Federal Aviation Administration as a safe airport that the federal government has deemed worthy of receiving funding for an expansion, Gouge said.

The county also needs to enlarge its commercial and industrial tax base, she said.

“Everyone keeps saying we’re going to destroy this county,” she said. “I do not understand how lengthening the runway a little bit will do that.”

To date, 1,200 residents have signed a petition in opposition.

“This project will be a jet pilot’s dream, but a community’s nightmare,” Buczkowski said. “You represent thousands of voting citizens, not a few corporations or the FAA.”

If you go

» What: Airport vote

» When: 10 a.m. Tuesday

» Where: Carroll government offices, 225 N. Center St., Westminster

kvolkmann@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

8:25 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 re: "BWI struggles as international magnet"

Examiner Reader said:
The most obvious reason why Maryland cannot attract international business is that the state beurcacrats, most of who come from the hick town Baltimore, refuse to even acknowledge the Nation's Capital which is enaces by Maryland by three sides. The state may have changed the name of the only state-run airport to include Washington, but that's as far as the politicians go. In Maryland, everything is about Baltimore, despite the true economic engine of the state being Montgomery County, which is struggling to compete with Northern Virginia, a region with a huge international business center. Maryland has failed in so many ways. It's a hick state through and through.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:51 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 8, 2007 re: "Airport meeting disappoints"

Examiner Reader said:
Mr. Rau makes some good points, however his references to noise and property values at the Greensboro airport are not a good comparison to the situation in Carroll County. Greensboro is an international airport with regular commercial passenger flights. That is not and will not be the case here.

176 agree | 198 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:21 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 8, 2007 re: "Airport meeting disappoints"

Examiner Reader said:
This airport issue is NOT about accepting the FACT that Westminster is growing. It actually has little to do with the growth of Westminster. Did the last expansion "boost" enormous growth for Westminster? Corporations can currently use CCRA without an expansion. Remember - its already a safe airport at its current size - this airport has a good safety record now - let's get other current issues cleaned up before even considering adding more!

203 agree | 181 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:59 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007 re: "Airport expansion plan doesn’t fly with some county residents"

Jodi Siu said:
There are also Carroll residents that want to see the expansion. I think it is a great thing! It will be safer for our many pilots in the county and quieter for those close to the airport. Growth is a good think any people should accept the fact that Westminster is growing.

311 agree | 239 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:23 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"

George Grubby said:
I have no tolerence for public official or citizens who speak out against abusive spending and taxes untill they stand to be on the receiving end of such funds. Yes, most likly if we do not accept these funds they will go somewhere else, however it is that attitude which fuels the perpetual motion of ever rising taxes. I urge or commisioners to live up to their conservative principals and say no to the temptation of federal money and not to forfiet values for value.

218 agree | 221 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:22 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"

lisa said:
I moved to carroll county to get away from the noise. Please leave things the way they are. the citizens of carroll county should speak not the government

193 agree | 197 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:09 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"

Examiner Reader said:
I also sent a letter. Why was I not mentioned as one of the nine? Is the opposition being hidden? NO AIRPORT EXPANSION. The citizens are against the Expansion. Commissioners, represent the people.

208 agree | 203 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:11 PM MST on Thu., May. 31, 2007 re: "New anti-expansion group demands delay of airport vote"

Examiner Reader said:
I ran across your stories on the internet while looking for help for our town's opposition to the airport expansion. I live around the Crisfield-Somerset Cty Airport in Crisfield, MD. Our county (Somerset) had an Environmental Assessment done by URS (May 2007)- as a result of this study the county wants to take 3 homes/33 acres of trees/8 acres of wetlands. WE ARE IN AN UPROAR over this. We are a very small town with a very small airport. We do not need an increase in the amt of planes, in size of planes & noise. 80% of residents around airport are retired or close to it. We have 700 signatures on our petition, we sent copies to FAA, URS, local, state & federal politicians. As a result of this, a public hearing is planned for us to speak against this expansion. You should be afforded the same opportunity as us. Contact your commissioners. We have just taken the next step closer to winning, but who knows what are real chances are. I wish you all luck. M. Atkins

222 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:09 PM MST on Thu., May. 31, 2007 re: "New anti-expansion group demands delay of airport vote"

Examiner Reader said:
Perhaps the Commissioners need a pay raise. 45K would make anyone fight the system. Lets get three new Commissioners and give them a pay raise to lead this County for the people. We voted for these and we need a new batch.

207 agree | 186 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:47 AM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Airport’s runway plan threatens asphalt plant"

Examiner Reader said:
To set the record straight: My family has been near the airport for almost 50 years. We didn't "buy" a house near the airport. We were here before the airport. I have spoken to many others who say they were told by the county there were no plans for expansion. One woman said she even went to the planning department and checked before she bought her house. If the county wants to expand the airport, they should not have allowed (and continue to allow) so many housing developments near the airport. Where is proper "Land Use Planning"? The County's claims that "airport users" will pay for the expansion costs is nonsense. It is the taxpayers who will pay. There is no hard and fast line between the Carroll County Airport Enterprise Fund and county taxpayers' general fund. Watch the numbers. This year the new hangars show up in the "Privately Funded" column. Watch what happens next year. Mysteriously, those numbers will drift back into the "County-funded" column.

462 agree | 213 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:41 AM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007 re: "Qatar Airways, others, offering new flights to Dulles"

Anti-NIMBI said:
Wow, what can I say; if not having airplanes fly over your deck while you sip your martini is important to you, maybe next time don't buy a house near an airport.

430 agree | 236 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:59 PM MST on Wed., May. 23, 2007 re: "FAA taking steps to reduce airplane noise after complaints"

Las Vegas resident said:
Recently the FAA has imposed a new flight path over a large amount of homes in west Las Vegas. They said there would be no compromise or restrictions. I came across this article and it tells me the FAA are hypocrites! Being the fastest growing city for the last 25 years the quality of life has gotten worse with traffic, crime, and now massive jet planes flying over my house from 6 A.M. to 1 A.M. You are lucky to get some kind of compromise with the FAA.

215 agree | 206 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:36 AM MST on Mon., May. 21, 2007 re: "Anti-expansion group submits petition"

Examiner Reader said:
The citizens of Carroll County truly need to be heard and taken seriously in this issue. This proposed expansion is not in the best interest of the county's loyal citizens. This proposed expansion has no justification to economically sound. This proposed expansion has no benefit for the county's own citizens who strive to make Carroll County a great place to live! Keep Carroll County Beautiful!

232 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:14 AM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "FAA taking steps to reduce airplane noise after complaints"

residents being ignored said:
If i came to your house and did loops around it on my dirt bike you would call the police and i would be in trouble for noise and property damage.what police do we call for your noise and property damage? i cant stand the noise or turbulance in the past 3 years,nothing has been done about it,the cracks in my ceilings and walls are getting bigger,it wakes me up in the middle of the night.we can not open our windows here.not to mention the health and saftey issues..no one has paid for any sound proofing yet.before this plan is even thinkable you should take care of the damage that is already caused to tinicum.BEFORE IT GOES ANY FURTHER.

238 agree | 217 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)