California News

Soybeans, chicken fat get boost as biodiesel gains foothold in gas market

Jun 7, 2007 12:00 AM (450 days ago) by John Davisson, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Chicken fat, soybeans and used vegetable oil are finding a new use across the state and country.

Biodiesel, a fuel made from processed animal fats and vegetable oils, is gaining a small foothold in a market still dominated by its petroleum counterpart. The product can be used in normal diesel engines but is nontoxic and produces significantly less carbon dioxide.

According to a National Biodiesel Board estimate, U.S. consumption soared to 250 million gallons in 2006, up from just 75 million gallons the year before.

The organization’s Web site lists seven Maryland distributors, and the state’s first factory for the product opened in Worcester County last June.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Once a Midwestern anomaly, biodiesel has become more popular on the East Coast in recent years, according to John Hoffman of Westminster-based Tevis Oil.

“There’s a big push now with the increase in gasoline and diesel prices to look for alternative fuels,” Hoffman said. “I don’t think we’re ever going to see biodiesel replacing the petroleum market, but if it can reduce the consumption by 10 or 20 percent, that would be terrific.”

Biodiesel is incompatible with the gasoline-burning engines found in most consumer vehicles, but the fuel has developed a niche market among farming equipment, state highway fleets, home-heating systems and other diesel-burning machines.

“The primary concern [of customers] is that it’s environmentally friendly and that it helps energy independence,” said Ginger Warren, vice president of Maryland Biodiesel Inc.

One of the primary sources of biodiesel — soybeans — is also Maryland’s second-largest crop.

Sandy Davis, executive director of the Maryland Soybean Board, said the organization has made efforts to get government agencies and consumers to switch to biodiesel blends.

“Of course price is a factor, but once people give it a try, the price doesn’t seem to bother them as much because they see the benefits of using it,” Davis said.

Limitations on biodiesel production make it unlikely to supplant petroleum altogether as a fuel source. According to a 2005 report by the U.S. Department of Energy, almost all of the arable land on Earth would need to be planted with high-yield crops to meet current energy needs with biofuels.

The fuel has other drawbacks, as well. Because of its solvent properties, many vehicle manufacturers advise owners to clean fuel filters more often when using the product. And while the fuel has become more competitive as oil costs have risen, Hoffman said, it remains slightly more expensive than petrodiesel.

“As we get production locally, hopefully that’s going to help with the cost,” Hoffman said. “We won’t have to pay for so much in the way of transportation.”

Where to buy biodiesel

» Baltimore Biodiesel, 2800 Sisson St., Baltimore, 410-235-3080

» Bare Truck Center, Route 140, Westminster, 410-848-4433

» Canton Biofuels/Jestor Technologies, 4201 Boston St., Baltimore, 443-255-5092

» Taylor Oil Co. Inc., 28 Thomas Ave., Brooklyn, 908-884-3813

» Taylorsville Shell, 2605 West Liberty Road, New Windsor, 410-634-8901

» Tevis Oil Company, 82 John St., Westminster, 410-840-0666

» Tevis Oil Inc., 1618 North Main St., Hampstead, 410-848-4433

» Westway, 1055 Hull St., Baltimore, 410-539-5950

Advantages of biodiesel

» It is less toxic than table salt and biodegrades as fast as sugar.

» Since it is made in the United States from renewable resources such as soybeans, its use decreases our dependence on foreign oil and contributes to our own economy.

» Biodiesel contains no sulfur or aromatics, and use of biodiesel in a conventional diesel engine results in substantial reduction of unburned hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulate matter.

» Biodiesel is better for the environment because it is made from renewable resources and has lower emissions compared with petroleum diesel.

» A U.S. Department of Energy study showed that the production and use of biodiesel, compared with petroleum diesel, resulted in a 78.5percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.

Source: Maryland Biodiesel

jdavisson@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

2:19 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 7, 2008 re: "Anne Arundel businesses and homeowners protest critical-area bill"

Examiner Reader said:
Finally something to stop people from building and then getting a permit. IT ABOUT TIME!

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:17 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 4, 2008 re: "Anne Arundel businesses and homeowners protest critical-area bill"

Examiner Reader said:
in anne arudnel county they should worry about their police department before the environ, i mean whether they allow mahjor accidents because they close down an interstate for 10 vehciles to get on or let dogs kill a goat without getting involve. i mean if you are not wearing a seat belt in anne arundel you will get a ticket but god forbid the polcie need to direct traffic. none of them know how they just close the road even while four of them sit there looking at the accident. now big brother wants to tell you whether you can cut down a tree. how about the developers, or better yet the county themselves. once a sewer gets built the county lets all these developers just move right on in. that is the problem.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:00 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 4, 2008 re: "Homeowners protest critical-area bill"

johnn said:
this is what people like omalley do when they want something

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:57 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "Women at the front of the new green movement"

Examiner Reader said:
Tegiri: Sounds like a bunch of whining to me.....how come I DONT see you out there making a change..from the way you are framing your comment you must have an advanced degree or something....so when can I expect you to show up to a community of color and create sustainable change?!?!...tomorrow maybe? I think not. Stick to what you "say" you know..and not making ignorant comments

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:21 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "Women at the front of the new green movement"

Examiner Reader said:
You don't need a degree per se when your mentor who has a master's degree was giving her hands on experience and that's what she has is EXPERIENCE so instead of getting a degree she took a break and did the groundwork and has done more things in the Bayview -Hunter's Point community than most 25 yr olds.Bill Gates didn't graduate from Harvard but he is still BILL GATES because he had hands on experience with the technology. Furthermore, The Women Policy Institute obviously thought she was good enough to receive a yearlong fellowship...ignorant people like you "tegiri" (which is a fake name by the way) make me sick...but a question we should ask is "what are you doing about EJ in your community??? "

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:42 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 27, 2008 re: "Women at the front of the new green movement"

Tegiri Nenashi said:
The education background (or the lack of thereof) is remarkable. Some college (community?), and arts? How do these people can form an educated opinion upon what technologies are good and what are bad for the environment?

4 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:12 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

Examiner Reader said:
I've discovered that at least 80% of the pile placed there is contaminated by fuel and human waste from a broken sewer pipe and the rest is probably been contaminated by contact. The City directed where to leave it. Their plan is to have all of the contaminents wash out into the community and then stick one of the contractors with the cost of moving it once it is "clean". City pays to dispose of contaminated materials, contractor pays to move uncontaminated (now you see their game). City will not share test results after "dog and pony show" of moving 12 truck loads. I'm sure we will see results once they get a good test. It is amazing that City wastes money on politically connected but utterly useless layer of "consulting" oversite (they already use RK&K, Whiting Turner & qualified good city inspectors and also 4th unnamed layer of pointless political money related oversight) , but will not pay to protect residents from contaminated material. All easily verified by good reporter

9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:46 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008 re: "Severn Savings Bank debuts largest green roof in Annapolis"

Mike said:
I bet Severn Savings wishes they had not built this green monster/white elephant now that the stock price has gone from 22 to 6...yikes!

6 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:05 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "In reversal, city to remove toxic dirt"

Examiner Reader said:
nothing like a pile of dirt in the city!

8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:56 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "Steep fees for felled trees — if Belmont has its way"

Examiner Reader said:
I guess the City of Belmont is more worried about saving its dying and hazardous trees than the homeless camps that were being covered by these trees. I personally was happy to see the trees removed I was always worried about the big branches overhanging the roadway that were broken not to mention that the homeless camp was sent packing because they lost their cover of the tree branches hanging down. Why would the city sue them for providing a great service, except they want money from the little guys.

10 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:57 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008 re: "Toxin-laden dirt poses no threat, according to Baltimore officials"

Examiner Reader said:
You can bet on it that if the pile of dirt had been left in Roland Park, it would be gone PDQ.

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:15 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Toxin-laden dirt poses no threat, according to Baltimore officials"

Examiner Reader said:
Solution - Either move it or put up a 12 foot high fence around it with security 24 hrs a day, 7 days a week. (whichever is cheaper.

8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:52 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

Examiner Reader said:
Great. I live two blocks away and walk my dog past that pile of dirt. Wonderful Baltimore. Just wonderful.

7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008 re: "City refuses to remove toxic dirt despite dangers, documents show"

johnn said:
not dixsons clean and green program is it

8 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:56 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008 re: "Greenbelt can continue preservation"

Examiner Reader said:
I guess when the salmon count is so low that wildlife agencies have to place a mandatory ban on fishing to replenish their numbers, and when the whales are about 10-15% thinner, it's a sign that the oceans are stressed out. Kudos to the state Supreme Court for protecting the ocean and giving our coasts protective areas to restore ecosystems and rejuvenate her marine life.

14 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:23 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Dark skies for solar-training plan"

Examiner Reader said:
Policy issues related to the solar program need to be vetted before money is spent, McGoldrick told The Examiner in an e-mail. The supervisor characterized Solar City’s threat to abandon The City as “greenmail.” Oh man...can someone please get goldbricker McGoldrick to get a real life, hopefully one not in public service! Geeze if this guy ran the world we would be forever spitting in the wind.

15 agree | 15 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:02 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Toss your plastics into recycling bins"

Examiner Reader said:
Next step: Wire Hangers!!! (Dry cleaners don't seem to want them back).

17 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:41 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "Toss your plastics into recycling bins"

Examiner Reader said:
I throw everything I can into the recycling bin and let them decide.

20 agree | 19 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:23 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Maryland’s coastal grass continues to vanish"

Examiner Reader said:
i think the bicycle built for water is a dum story

21 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:36 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 31, 2008 re: "It's a bicycle built for pure water, too"

Examiner Reader said:
how much will the bike cost?

21 agree | 20 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:48 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 29, 2008 re: "The City gets dark tonight"

Examiner Reader said:
Good. Can't wait for the criminals to do a number on the City!

20 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:39 AM MST on Wed., Jan. 9, 2008 re: "Gore preaches to global warming choir"

Examiner Reader said:
there are no heading on what each paragraph is about

165 agree | 205 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:45 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "S.F. green groups to receive more than $2M"

Bob said:
What concerns me isn't so much all this green stuff; (and green is just a buzz word for Corporate America to make big bucks)what is being done to animal species being wiped off the face of the earth? Polar bear, Rhinos (being slaughered for their horns); elephants, snow tigers, and the list goes on and on;

228 agree | 183 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:43 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 20, 2007 re: "S.F. green groups to receive more than $2M"

Examiner Reader said:
all this green is a bunch of crap....i still burn wood, drive my car alone to work (better than some smelly bus or bart) do not recycle..thats what i pay those garbagemen for. i would rather use my firplace and wood than pay Pacific Grred and Extortion zny of their rip bills.

236 agree | 194 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:21 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Audubon study sees local birds particularly threatened"

Another Examiner Reader said:
Sure nuclear power is "clean." Just ask the Chernobylites.

230 agree | 241 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:56 PM MST on Thu., May. 24, 2007 re: "Experts: Light pollution growing environmental problem"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank you for this article. However it needs more development, especially in the area of light trespass onto down hill property. Full cut off on level ground is not full cut off on slopes. Also, motion detectors often activate when a person walks on his own property and is detected by the neighbor's poorly designed/installed system. Please consider this in the future.

653 agree | 430 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:36 AM MST on Mon., May. 14, 2007 re: "Gore preaches to global warming choir"

Examiner Reader said:
Al Gore should provide more support for nuclear power. When you come to the realization that we have to STOP using fossil fuels, there is nothing else that can produce the huge amount of power that would be required to replace fossil fuels. Nuclear already provides 20% of our electric power. Nuclear power is as cheap or maybe cheaper than coal, especially when you compare 'clean coal' vs. nuclear. It is time we started replacing all of our coal fired power plants with nuclear.

871 agree | 431 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:27 AM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "Environmental advisers request study of county’s waste stream"

Sandy Wisner said:
Dear Kelsey, If you take 15% of one portion of a thing and 17% of another portion of the same thing, you will not get 32% of the whole. Depending on the size of the portions, you will have between 15 and 17 percent of the whole.

619 agree | 458 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement