Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
And sadly, the one person probably uniquely qualified to dance around the crazy politics of San Francisco to just do the daunting task at hand has decided to walk away after 40 years of dedicated public service in education. One could hardly blame her for wanting to step off the spinning platform of a never-ending, stress-filled job after all this time. But there’s a reason a lot of tears were shed last week among the many teachers, colleagues and students for whom she played an integral part since she came to the school district in July 1967.
Members of the Board of Education say they will announce their selection of the new superintendent this week following a lengthy national search. But it would be hard to imagine how they could find anyone who knows the district better or could deal with the intricacies and hurdles of running one of The City’s most discordant organizations.
“In my mind, the school district needs a long-term commitment from the next superintendent, and I’ve done a lot of soul-searching recently to get to this point,’’ Chan told me the day after she announced she was going to retire July 1, four decades to the day that she joined the district as a young teacher. “But I’m still in good health and I want to pick and choose what I do next. There’s a lot of choices out there for me.’’
One of them could have been to stay on and finish a job for which she once told me she had been training her whole life. But even though she was the hometown person who would have had the easiest transition to a post that has driven the most qualified candidates to distraction (and departure), it was always unclear whether she would have had support from the school board, which has been the source of so much dissension and infighting in recent years.
A general problem with most big city school superintendents is that they’re like baseball managers, traveling from one organization to the next despite their records or their rapport with the players.
Anyone who remembers Bill Rojas’ tenure as San Francisco’s schools chief can think of the period when he was hailed as a great reformer and then quickly became the man who left the district in financial tatters while treating teachers as if they were interchangeable bank tellers. Rojas was run out of town and yet landed as the heralded and high-priced school superintendent in Dallas, where it took the locals about two years to realize Rojas was a terrible fit and fired him.
And Arlene Ackerman was widely praised as the perfect fit for San Francisco’s rainbow coalition, only to run directly into the ideological buzz saw of the board. She took her mighty severance package as the final payoff for her willingness to do daily battle with her windmill-jousting trustees.
Chan was just the opposite of her two predecessors, the calm in the eye of the storm. She brought quiet dignity and respect to the position, someone who worked overtime to reduce the level of acrimony at the board. Her track record is one of the reasons she got support from teachers, principals, parents and union officials. She attended local public schools, she was a longtime teacher who moved up in the management ranks, and she personally knew just about everyone in the district.
“Gwen brought a sense of cooperation to the position,’’ said financier Warren Hellman, who is part of the private group that helped raise money for public schools. “I just worry that the era of building confidence and respect could go away.’’
So it’s something of a shame that someone with perfect credentials to lead the district is departing — to be replaced by someone who will no doubt be hailed as a great visionary. It’s a job for someone who needs to deal with the nuts and bolts of an old engine — not the flash-and-dash politics that play to the crowds.
“It was never the glory I was after,’’ Chan told me. “I wanted to see people work together and bring peace to the district.’’
That’s no small goal in this fractious city. Just recently, Chan was called in to handle a situation in which two neighbors complained that grammar school kids were reciting the Pledge of Allegiance too loudly each morning.
Chan said she could write a book about the challenges of leading the district. No doubt it would read like fiction.
Ken Garcia’s column appears Tuesdays, Thursdays and weekends in The Examiner. E-mail him at kgarcia@examiner.com or call him at (415) 359-2663.



Comments from Examiner Readers
8:17 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 21, 2007 re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:23 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 20, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:28 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 19, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:19 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 19, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
12:45 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 16, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:53 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 15, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:12 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
8:10 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007
re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
6:52 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007
re: "Garcia: Hsu saga takes on a bizarre new twist"
Report as inappropriate
2:34 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 6, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
9:25 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 6, 2007
re: "Garcia: Hsu saga takes on a bizarre new twist"
Report as inappropriate
9:00 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 6, 2007
re: "Garcia: Hsu saga takes on a bizarre new twist"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 5, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
4:43 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007
re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
10:34 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007
re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
9:12 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007
re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
9:07 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007
re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
4:19 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 30, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
2:46 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 30, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
9:26 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Cabbie case highlights S.F.’s taxi scene"
Report as inappropriate
2:23 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
2:19 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
1:30 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
1:22 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
1:14 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
12:04 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
11:05 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
10:32 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
8:31 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 23, 2007
re: "Garcia: Cabbie case highlights S.F.’s taxi scene"
Report as inappropriate
11:54 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007
re: "Garcia: The mystery of Ed Jew"
Report as inappropriate
1:45 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
10:12 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 14, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
3:58 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 14, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
2:16 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 8, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
9:29 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 7, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:58 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
7:55 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 3, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
3:59 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
1:52 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
4:11 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:38 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:13 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
8:58 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
8:07 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
7:34 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
7:22 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
7:09 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
6:36 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
3:07 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
Tyronne Fatsengalla said:
Mayor Newson did mention that if the crime rate didn't fall he would resign. But there was a small disclaimer re: the Tenderloin, Hunter's Point and Western Adition crime. So all is well in SF. Prediction the Homicide (187's) will continue at an alarming rate. I continue to commend the SFPD rank and file who;s hands are tied by City politics. Hopefully no more Officer's will be injured/killed during his administration.
394 agree | 356 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
does anyone remember when gavin said he'd resign if the crime rate didn't fall under his leadership? we're set to surpass last years rate of violent homicides and newsom is asking for everyone else's resignations? i don't get it?
378 agree | 379 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There has never in recent memory been a politician who evokes better the "emperor with no clothes" as Gavin Newsom. Despite having done nothing over 4 years, but look fabulous, people fawn over him as though he were a genuine hero, when in fact he is a celebrity. Yes, here in NORTHERN California, we have succumbed to the cult of celebrity. It no longer is the precinct of Southern Califronia. Fortunately, there are enough right-thinking people throughout California that our beloved mayor will have insufficient play for statewide office. Besides, with such emerging talents as Obama, Gavin's portfolio and his presence are absolutely lightweight and will not withstand scrutiny. Enjoy the next 4 years Gavin, because your trajectory in public service will be mercifully short.
401 agree | 650 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
to hello ken - are you aware that the number of police offciers in SF are diminishing in such numbers that any new recruits cannot get us to even let alone to the staffing level we need to have? Correspondingly, makings cops walk beats further compounds the shortage. Car patrols help the staffing shortage by enabling greater coverage by the same number of cops. Were we to make this compromise of putting cops on a walking beat, there would be a shortage elsewhere that would create crime in these locations.
613 agree | 626 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
hello ken said:
yes ken, we would not want sfpd to get out of their safe, warm cars and walk around alittle.
398 agree | 379 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
L. Amiot said:
Newsom is a coward to treat his appointees like this. His selfishness and narcissism is boundless. He betrays his friends and he betrays his supporters. Somewhere along the line Newsom missed out on learning ethical behavior.
417 agree | 642 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Newsom giddy over firing people? This dude is one sick puppy.
666 agree | 442 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I wouldn't call it voodoo, the fact that Hsu the Fugitive who got away twice in the last week or so... I'd probably call it "incompetence" on the part of the authorities.... then again, seeing as how Hsu has been so generously funding the Clintons , and other Democrats for some years now .. I might call it a "political favor", etc...
397 agree | 392 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Bay Area legal authorities in charge of Hsu couldn't be That Stupid, could they??? Or maybe there is something more sinister at play here....maybe the Lawmen would get more results by investigating some of Hsu's Demorat friends in high places..... there's a tip for you, geniuses...
443 agree | 668 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a lifelong Democrat who was foolish enough to vote for Mayor Newsom the first time around, it will not happen again. Eight years under this mayor will likely leave a san francisco where our unique quality-of- life will be barely recognizable. Unless, of course, a somehow "suburbanized" San Francisco is familiar to you.
400 agree | 612 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hey everybody, Lets all get out the race cards and have another round of You racist.
655 agree | 429 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
A. Perini said:
Hsu is a stooge for the PRC. He mules money to the Dems from their like-minded “One World” colleagues in communist China. The money they send to influence American politics is the cash that we pay for their myriad of inexpensive manufactured items exported by the shipload to the USA. Right now, China owns much of our debt. We are paying for our own destruction. Hsu is but one catalyst that has been spotlighted. In many ways, America is now where Rome was in 400 A.D.
446 agree | 632 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
at least we don't have Willie Brown, around, anymore.
657 agree | 386 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No facts regarding this mans donations have been made and are pure speculative. Until then, he is a naturalized citizen and deserves his right to be innocent. Stop pointing fingers and judging due to his race.
437 agree | 462 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
NO bail should be allowed for this fugitive, but with political connections that he has I will be expecting him to walk free on bail and skip the country.
460 agree | 434 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
unclesmrgol said:
The money Hsu donated does not belong to the candidates to give to whatever charity they will -- it belongs to Hsu's victims, to be restored to them. As of now, the charities chosen by the candidates stand to receive stolen property, and I expect them to behave exactly like the candidates. As false logic would put it, if you give money stolen from a villager back to the village idiot, that's the same as giving it back to the villager who was harmed -- since they are both in the same village.
704 agree | 658 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
the chinacom army has been funneling campaign contributions illegally to their comrades at clinton inc. for almost decades. Can you say ' who's to say what illegal is ?'
662 agree | 416 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
KeenPlanner said:
And watch him get a sweet deal on some valuable presidio land, and watch the presidio trust let him build whatever he wants. It's times like this that it's obvious that the examiner is owned by a right-wing religious extremist. No doubt a good friend of Fisher's.
663 agree | 368 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sfmike said:
Ken Garcia's p.r. puff piece on Donald Fisher and his third rate modern art collection (but it's worth lots of money!) was genuinely disgusting. Garcia writes, "So despite the off-base criticism of Fisher’s museum plan from the ideologically bound...even a brief glimpse of what awaits the public if the museum opens in three years, as planned, would quicken the pulse of any art lover." I'm an art lover and the pulse isn't racing, especially at the prospect of Warhol portraits of Mick Jagger disfiguring the sylvan setting of the Presidio. And describing Fisher as "a man who made much of his fortune on his canny knack of finding and buying real estate" is a bit coy. It should more truthfully read "a canny knack for finding and buying politicians and hack journalists."
602 agree | 660 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The problem with taxi cabs in San Francisco is there is no competition. We need to eliminate the medallions. Anyone who wants to drive a taxi should apply for a business permit, get a background check, a physical, a drivers license, and an biannual inspection on his taxi. Then go forth and drive. the cream of the crop will rise and the rest will get other jobs. We don't limit the number of restaurants that are in The City why should we limit the number of taxis?
678 agree | 501 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
ed shuck noe valley said:
The good doctor from the Bay View / HP is a serious, sincere candidate. But she will not win outside the Western Addition/Bay View/HP. She has one strong plank and (compared to Gavin) little or no money. But the issue deserves to go forward. The HP toxic clean up is not an issue that Gavin could run against. He would do well to adopt her position or one very similar. There is no more pressing issue that the health crisis in the South East quadrant of the city.
534 agree | 657 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
shortattnspan said:
You can see how dumbed-down America is becoming by reading the comments section of any news site. What's happened to proper English, grammar and spelling? What's happened to actually caring about how you represent yourself and your views? Why do people assume it's okay to use "Net shorthand" during the exchange of supposedly intelligent ideas?
396 agree | 682 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Don't know what i will do said:
I always vote even on off-year elections but this is one year i'm sitting out an election because "frankly i don't give a D***" The city, i feel is on the wrongtrack; we have serious problems and the working middle class is being squeezed but yet nothing is being done. We have a mayor who at first i thought would do a very good job; i'm disappointed' we have a district attorney and when murders are committed she will not seek the death penalty because she is against; well that is just saying "come to sf murderers, murder as many as you want, cause you won't get the death penalty; you most like will sit for 20 years and go on with your lives; the crime rate in SF is out of control, million dollar condos are being built (and the housing market is sinking and the average SF resident, probably can't even afford the down payment) and don't let me get started with MUNI, the homeless, the flighty streets . . .
430 agree | 396 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
EDwin Lee should be banned from SF heis a low down lying money stealing racist lyer and him Mohammad Nuru ha swiped the city cleaned
631 agree | 628 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
if the SF public re elects Gavin Nuisance then ot me that says it all we don't really cxare about our lives. Nuisance is the pits, worst I ever seen he is a follower drug user, and he is a cheater
415 agree | 394 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There are no serious candidates for Mayor other than Newsom. There are no serious issues for the progressives to tout that aren't being addressed by the current administration. If there were, I am sure that the Greens would be running a legitimate candidate for mayor. Why else would they? Maybe Matt Gonzalez hasn't raised enough money suiing the City to put on a decent campaign. Maybe they don't want to damage their inflated opinions of themselves. Maybe they prefer to sit on the sidelines until "the time is right". Maybe it easier to complain without coming up with solutions. Maybe they have no guts to take on a difficult task.
455 agree | 614 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ken, you are a total Newsom flunkie. You don't even try. There are serious issues in the city. And there are serious candiates. Most importantly, Newsom through his handlers, minions, political consultants are trying to destroy his opponents and this city. Won't it be funny when he loses?
448 agree | 392 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I live in District 6, a place where my representative believes that if i plant a tree on the street, sweep up my block, paint out graffiti, organize a crime watch, call the police, then I "rich and callous" and trying to gentrify the area. Excuse me, I was born in the city in 1954, went to public schools and still live here. If we have District representatives then we need someone who represents all people in our District. Right now the system is really broken. I have talked to my neighbors and the gut feeling is that we might as well have city wide elected supervisors.
659 agree | 608 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am not sure why a no name reporter finds it hard to understand that some citizens in San Francisco actual care about the future of San Francisco. And are willing to engage in the political process and become a challenger in the Mayoral race. Making fun of these individuals does not change the facts that San Francisco has serious problems that need fixing buy those who care.
728 agree | 369 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
Ed Jew has a medallion. But it must be in Burlingame, because still you can't get a taxicab in the Sunset no matter how many times you call.
460 agree | 439 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
mendez said:
with all this legal foot dragging going around with Ed, they might as well let this Jew go scot free.
850 agree | 664 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Will Clark Rules said:
Don't you guys remember Dennis Peron? For most advocates the whole concept of medical marijuana dispensaries was a means to the true end... legalized dealing. Most of the original advocates admitted this from the very start. It was never about helping sick people - it was about legalizing pot. Most of us who voted for prop 215 knew this as well. And look at how it turned out!
674 agree | 460 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Only god can save you said:
when you have to take the highway, but you are stuck in traffic. So, if you want another Katrina situation, just avoid traffic issues. and if you want it not, you could just listen to the wispers of the asphalt. unfortunately, the wispers are gone into the wind
703 agree | 461 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
any word on supervisor sandoval censorship rally of micheal savage at the radio station.sounds like the left just turned far right or met in the middle
485 agree | 475 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Vandallay. Really?
418 agree | 413 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Leadership is lacking in Room 200 of City Hall, the Board of Supes, the Police Dept, the DA's Office, and in the Courts. We have inexperienced, incapable, fearful people in key positions in our city government infrastructure. How did this happen? Apathy, lazy, frightened, ignorant constiuency, aggressive ill-planned social engineering, advocate judges, and big money pulling the strings. Without credible, honest, ethical, courageous leadership, this city will founder. Dr SS Van Nostrum, from the Institute
492 agree | 459 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is what the citzens of San Francisco wanted when they voted for the mayor and board of Supes...Why are they complaining now??? You all got what you wanted..Police Reform...Enjoy...
588 agree | 456 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Arrests-down, traffic citations-down, officer iniatated activities-down, field interoogation stops-down, response time to crimes in progress -up, staffing-down,political interference-up,morale-down,promotional opportunities-non existent, recruitment of highly qualified members-down, recovery of stolen autos-down, follow up investigations of felonies-down, decision making, leading, and managaing the Department-sub zero. community policing strategies-below sea level, and the list goes on. Who's to blame_________________________?? Arthur Vandallay, Hunters Point.....
731 agree | 470 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
A suggestion... Get rid of the Police Chief's position and let the Mayor/Chief directly call the shots for the police department. You would have the same results and save the city $200,000+ per year!
740 agree | 648 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Interesting perspective on Ruby Tourk. I hope she does come out swinging, or at least doesn't cower into oblivion or stay silent out of fear of the "City Hall Machine" If she's got something to say she should say it.
535 agree | 731 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
eyeopener said:
Where does Garcia get his information? Dillon was well liked in D5, though some say not as effective as he could have been. The supes try to make improvements, but their hands are tied. Most of the problems here are top down. Fong is a weak leader, and the mayor only cares about looking good. meanwhile, drug dealers reside and do business unencumbered in public housing. The mayor does nothing. The housing authority does nothing. young people continue to die on the streets. i guess if the problems are not happening to rich, white people in the marina, it doesn't really matter.
666 agree | 464 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
body part said:
no matter what the branch of civil servancy any of them are from, they will eventually run into City Hall politics. you have to play ball according to the calls of the higher-ups. I'm sure the top brasses don't have a clear picture what the lower brasses are doing, but if you're a cop these days in a new era, you have to bend with the politics, good or bad. whether it makes sense or not. I've spoken with cops before - do your twenty or so, get out and retire into the sunset. city hall employees are there for exactly that reason alone.
482 agree | 500 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gretchen said:
The police department has been understaffed for years because our "progressive" Supervisors kept taking the money for police recruit classes and spending it on other things - usually the homeless. Whether the police are on foot, in cars, on bikes or even horses, the police are understaffed thanks to the Supes, and without enough police, they can't be everywhere all the time - they have to jump from one hot spot to another. So, you can complain about the Mayor or the Police Chief if you want to, but the real problem has been that money requested to support police and crime prevention has been held hostage by the Board of Supervisors. This month Chris Daly campaigned up to the last minute to cut over $30 million from the budget to fund his pet projects. $3,000,000 of that would have been taken from the Police department. Fortunately saner minds prevailed and the police budget wasn't cut so we can expect more police to be available once they get through the academy.
453 agree | 513 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The blame is Mayor G Newson, Police Commission, and the Command Staff. The rank and file are hard working men and woman. Period.... Tom Del Torre
772 agree | 478 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
there have been shootings recently , and other crimes where the foot beats have been nearby (close enough to hear the shots) but the suspects got away cause the cops were on foot. I know many officers who have never walked a foot beat but sometime they get the information on a crime before dispaych sets up the call. many times i can call them and find out what happened and why and by whom. walking a beat will not get you to now the community talking to them will. you can talk to them if you drive or walk. There are many who should think about changeing jobs or thier supervisor should stick a foot up thier butts to get them to do thier job . thats where the reforms need to be.
882 agree | 541 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
out of the last three chiefs ive only seen fong at my station twice. Never have seen a supervisor or commisioner. I know that cpatians are telling their lts not to say anything about the foot beats and the staffing. they are told that if they are short to call other stations for help. What happens when the city is short do we ask daly city for help?
495 agree | 465 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Boehmer said:
Several years ago, I had to go to Central Police Station to find out about one of my Clients suffering from Dementia who had wondered off. I watched the general activity as I sat, observed and just waited. I was impressed with the amount of responsibility our Police are required to undertake. I wonder if any of the idealistic politicians and Mayor have ever spent time in one of our District Police Stations-saying nothing-just observing. I think by spending time-observing the amount of activity and Police Direction should prove to them that our Police have both a never-ending challenging and difficult period when it comes to their daily responsibilities as directed by their Captain and/or Lieutenants. There is no doubt that our Mayor and Supervisors would put aside their Progressive Thinking and become more realistic.
553 agree | 870 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
These new rounds of foot beats came from the mayors office to out do the supervisor plan. We are so short now that we sometimes only have one car to patrol the entire district. Its a joke. We get calls at our station two or three times a day from the fitfh floor saying that the MAyors office called and they want the homeless moved from (,,,,,,NAme your place). If the Mayor dosent want the homeless in sight he should make a law outlawing it. They made it sound as if these new foot beats would be filled with new people from the academy....there has not been a class since June 1st...we are way too short to staff them all safely. Nobody minds walking a beat but we want to be safe.
464 agree | 687 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Knot2brite said:
In a Democracy such as ours it is the ELECTED government's responsibility to decide how any department should do their job, including POLICE DEPARTMENT. Why is that so diffficult for the Officers of the SFPD to understand? Some people seem to believe we'd be better off if it were (IS?) the other way around.
559 agree | 501 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The low morale of the SFPD is well-deserved. Lazy and incompetent...
224 agree | 254 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree