SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Political buzz will blanket San Francisco on June 2, with re-election campaign events for the mayor and the district attorney taking place on the same day as a gathering of progressive activists that is being organized by Supervisor Chris Daly largely to announce a challenger for the mayor’s seat.
With less than six months until the November election, the mayor’s contest has provoked ongoing speculation about who — if anyone — will step into the ring to pose a real threat against Mayor Gavin Newsom, who continues to enjoy relatively high popularity ratings among voters.
Daly, a frequent Newsom critic, announced last week that The City’s progressives would hold a convention to consolidate a platform and get behind a candidate.
Daly said he called for the convention because he felt for the sake of “progressive unity” that the ongoing discussions about who should run for mayor should come to a conclusion — and a candidate.
“Setting June 2 as a deadline — this is me using my position as the progressive whip,” Daly said.
Many of the top names discussed as possible mayoral contenders have already gone on record saying they’re not interested in competing for the job in 2007, including Public Defender Jeff Adachi and Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin.
Former Mayor Art Agnos said he’s been approached by people about possibly running, but that he’s not convinced he’s the person for the job.
Former Board of Supervisors President Matt Gonzalez — whose last-minute run for mayor in 2003 forced Newsom into a runoff — is the progressives’ “strongest challenger,” Daly said, but the Green Party member has been noncommittal about giving it another try. Gonzalez did not return phone and e-mail messages from The Examiner on Friday.
Another person who did not respond to messages was Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, whom Daly and others call a strong contender for 2011, when Newsom is termed out of office.
In light of Newsom’s popularity, the progressives’ best strategy might be to use the race to prepare for the future, political analyst David Latterman said.
“Do they really think they’ll be able to get somebody to beat Newsom?” Latterman asked. “I suspect they’re doing this for Mirkarimi, so he can get his name out for four years from now.”
Daly said he still believes Newsom can be beat. Some have suggested that he’s the man for the job, but he said he has numerous reasons — including a baby due on Oct. 30 — not to run.
“I have no doubt I could field a strong, energized campaign, but the question is could that translate into a victory in November?” Daly said, adding it would be hard to compete against the multimillion-dollar campaign he suspects his opponents would wage against him.
Newsom has raised more than $1 million for his campaign, according to his top campaign consultant, Eric Jaye, who said the mayor’s popularity is a result of his performance in office.
“It’s a testimony to the strength of Gavin Newsom as mayor that they [the progressives] have to go to such extraordinary lengths to find someone to run against him,” Jaye said, dismissing accusations that the campaign team scheduled a volunteer rally on June 2 to draw attention away from the progressives’ convention.
Newsom was equally dismissive of the idea.
“I’m hardly consumed by a meeting that Chris Daly is organizing to find a candidate to run against me,” Newsom said.
Could anyone beat Gavin Newsom in the mayor's race? We've been tracking odds on challengers every day this year. Check out our complete list of candidates.



Comments from Examiner Readers
9:14 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007 re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
6:30 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
6:09 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
3:15 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
3:34 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
1:52 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
1:36 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Conaway drops out of mayoral contest"
Report as inappropriate
1:28 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
1:16 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
1:06 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
12:34 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
11:54 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
11:54 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
11:45 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
11:34 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
11:26 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
11:18 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
11:09 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
10:11 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
9:42 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
8:42 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
8:00 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
7:14 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
6:54 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Mayoral candidates rehash crime plans"
Report as inappropriate
5:55 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Conaway drops out of mayoral contest"
Report as inappropriate
5:49 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Conaway drops out of mayoral contest"
Report as inappropriate
3:54 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Conaway drops out of mayoral contest"
Report as inappropriate
5:20 PM MST on Sun., Aug. 19, 2007
re: "Mitchell campaign hires controversial adviser"
Report as inappropriate
5:40 AM MST on Sun., Aug. 19, 2007
re: "Mitchell campaign hires controversial adviser"
Report as inappropriate
1:39 PM MST on Sat., Aug. 18, 2007
re: "Mitchell campaign hires controversial adviser"
Report as inappropriate
9:49 AM MST on Sat., Aug. 18, 2007
re: "Mitchell campaign hires controversial adviser"
Report as inappropriate
9:35 AM MST on Sat., Aug. 18, 2007
re: "Mitchell campaign hires controversial adviser"
Report as inappropriate
7:43 AM MST on Sat., Aug. 18, 2007
re: "Mitchell campaign hires controversial adviser"
Report as inappropriate
12:19 PM MST on Mon., May. 21, 2007
re: "Daly looking for candidate to challenge Newsom"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
After last night's forum sponsored by the League of Women Voters, it is quite obvious to me and many others that this city is starving for the leadership and vision of both Bundley and Carter (what a team they would make). Intelligent, integrity, courage, commitment, vision and beholding to only the voters - this is what Baltimore needs. If you witnessed the MPTV and/or last night's forums, how can you attempt to deceive your very own ears, eyes and heart by considering any other candidate than these two. Dr. Bundley and Del. Carter, if you are reading these comments, please work out a solution between the two of you to support one or the other during this election. If you do, there is no doubt in my mind and that of many, many others that you will win hands down. You are so refreshing. We truly need leaders of your caliber at the helm. May God bless you and the city of Baltimore.
147 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reginald said:
Karen said it right! Mitchell and Dixon are not the answer to the problems in Baltimore City. Mr Bundley or Jill Carter are independent thinkers who are not connected to the previous administration. If the citizens of Baltimore want to have things the same old way being undermined by "The Teflon Leprechaun" Martin O' Malley then vote for Dixon or Mitchell. If not then switch and vote for someone else.
125 agree | 110 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Angie said:
I'm another Mitchell supporter!
123 agree | 141 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Did anyone notice Dixon's poor grammar. "Many progresses" "More better" on and on and on.......
125 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Karen said:
I say, vote for a candidate. But don't let it be Dixon or Mitchell. They are both shadt. Both liars. Frank Conaway should have thrown his support to someone worthy like Jill Carter or even Kaufman or Bundley.
130 agree | 112 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jennifer said:
I've read through all of the comments, and Shabazz is right, vote for the candidate YOU select. The media does try to brainwash the voters, i.e. the infamous Poll by the Baltimore Sun. Just whatever you do, please please please do not let it be Dixon. I beg of you. Our city will remain in shambles if she remains in office. She is the only one who thinks the state should continue to run our schools. She is scared to be in charge of anything, and scared to make any decisions on her own. She needs O'Malley, and we need change. Vote wisely on 9/11!
171 agree | 132 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Ori T. Shabazz said:
1st 20 minutes of the socalled debate went to dixon and Mitchell:1/3rd of the time!!! baltimore’s media is working a classic smoking mirrors on voters. think about why you say dixon and mitchell are front runners- it's because the media says they are front runners. the media has successfully circumvented our thought process. don't let them dictate to you whom to vote for. vote for the person you select, not the persons the media puts before you. we're not all dumb blue collar working class careless voters.
142 agree | 138 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Kim said:
I saw the debate last night. Wow! That's all I can say. I hope this city is never faced with a catastrophe such as 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, etc. Dixon can not speak publicly at all. She evaded all of the questions. Rehased the same old ideas. And repeated some of the same stuff the other candidates said. I don't trust her at all. On 9/11, please don't vote for Dixon the Vixen!
150 agree | 113 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mike, you are absolutely right. We have so much potential, but it is all being wasted. A commuter tax is the stupidest thing I have ever heard of. You pay a commuter tax every day that you drive around baltimore. You may be shot, you may be carjacked, your car may be vandalized, etc. So car insurance and medical insurance equates to this commuter tax everyone is buzzing about.
158 agree | 122 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader, Mike said:
Commuter tax! Yes indeed. That would cure all Baltimore's problems. How do people come up with such idiotic ideas? It is our businesses and their employees coming into the city which support and finance the city. What would be left of Baltimore if all the employers would move their companies out to the counties? What Baltimore should be doing is to create an environment in which more of the commuters from the suburbs want to live in the city. Get rid of the crime, get rid of the poor school system, get rid of the high real estate taxes; i.e., GET RID OF THE CORRUPT POLITICAL MACHINE which has been entrenched for as long as I can remember. With it's location, it's port, strong and well educated surrounding counties, it's proximity to Washington, Baltimore has the potential to be a premier U.S. city. However, the potential is being wasted. As long as we have a one party form of government, as we have had for much too long, we will continue to be a second class city.
164 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Citizens of Baltimore its time to send Shelia Dixion and her Sister packing! VOTE KEIFER MITCHELL MAYOR of BALTIMORE!
142 agree | 177 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yea, I watched the Forum and for a while I wasn't sure if I was watching reality TV or a sitcom. Some parts were hilarious! Seriously though, Baltimore City is in deep trouble and REALLY needs Kauffman's ideas in place, but we all know that will never happen.
121 agree | 135 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Crime plans? said:
We don't need crime plans! We need crime-fighting plans. And ones that are realistic.
133 agree | 131 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Vote Jill Carter
186 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No I am not from the Baltimore Sun. And I like Jill Carter, but I simply don't think she has a chance of winning. Sorry, I just don't see it. I saw one of her signs on Harford Road, and that was it. She just doesn't have a strong enough backing. I would prefer her to win over Dixon any day! But I am voting for Mitchell. I think he is the only candidate that has a real chance of beating Dixon. All Carter is going to do is skew the vote.
130 agree | 160 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Poor Baltimorons said:
All of these other cities are outraged at their murder rates. Boston, Newark, etc. and they have considerably less than the 205 we have. What is wrong with you people? Why do we accept what is going on here? Why are you not holding Dixon accountable? She is doing absolutely NOTHING. The only reason I can think of for people voting her is they graduated from the shoddy Baltimore School system she is also not addressing, and you simply don't know better.
154 agree | 123 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Who are you to decide in advance who has a chance of winning and who does not, the Baltimore Sun? Mitchell and Dixon are corrupt, bought-off, incompetent, self-serving, and dishonest. Jill Carter appeared sincere and intelligent. She answered her questions. She was not given enough time. I'm voting for her. I could and would never waste my vote on an unworthy candidate because you or anyone says they will win. Who are you to say Jill Carter should have run for council president?. Baltimore needs her for mayor. She's running for the right office. Dixon and Mitchell could both go to jail and they probably should.
183 agree | 121 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Jill Carter has no chance of winning, so what's the point? She should have ran for City Council President against SRB. The race is between Dixon and Mitchell. Period. And Dixon needs to repeat Fundamentals of Speech 101.
157 agree | 135 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Akhenaton wrote: Jill Carter has my vote, she is strong and will go after these "white collar" thugs (Baltimore City Public Administrators). In my opinion, Jill Carter (lawyer and statesperson) will find the missing monies that were stolen from the students/teachers/schools of baltimore city. She will bring indictments against the crooked and currupt PSC (BGE white collar thugs), hence, replacing them with administrators with "intergrity." Jill Carter will implement a partnership with the community activist and the FBI to implement enforcement/removal of "rogue" "gang affilliated" covert Baltimore City Police Administrators, who have betrayed the peoples of Baltimore City. She was the only person to call for an outside federal investigation of the arrest (Central Booking)by then baltimore city mayor O'Malley of innocent Baltimore City citizens and led the successful war in annapolis to have legislation changed...(expudgement of criminal records). COURAGE BEAUTY BRAINS..
134 agree | 108 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I thought Carter did a good job; she just didn't get the airtime Dixon and Mitchell got. Dixon has been hitting the headlines for years over questionable dealings (family, friends getting perks). We need change. Some of the candidates had some great ideas...hopefully whoever wins will implement the idea of taxing commuters who don't live in the city but come into it to work, etc. The main message from everyone except Dixon was that our city is broken and needs fixing...by new leaders. Get rid of Jessamy. As Warren Brown said in yesterday's Examiner, all the candidates are afraid of offending Jessamy. He is planning to move out of the city b/c of the poor leadershiip and crime!
129 agree | 130 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Dixon has plenty of speech coaches. So does keiffer mitchell. ot does not matter. theynare both corupt ansd either will rob the city blind. Sheila will steal eveything but the cash register. Mitchell will take the cash register too, and blame his father, and you gullibles will say poor Keiffer, instead of poor Baltimore. Baltimore City today is what O'Malley and his cronies, Dixon, Mitchell, Blake have made it. Wake up Baltimore. The truth shall set you free.
171 agree | 142 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Diane Jones said:
Dixon if you are reading, I ask you to PLEASE invest in a speech coach. You have so much money from your contractors, you surely could afford to pay for some help. A speech coach can truly help you in these last days before the election. Evading questions does nothing to help you. I am truly disapointed in your performance. You have been around too long to not have more concrete answers to questions concerning this ailing city. You've lost my vote.
118 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Dixon was awful at the debate! I was also surprised at Carter. I thought she would have done a better job. Mitchell has my vote.
153 agree | 119 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
All of these comments are absolutely ridiculous. Keiffer Mitchell is no thief. You all can go ahead and support Dixon if you want, but she will steal money and never blink an eye about it. Mitchell is honest. That is why is father is not working for him anymore. And Sheila's sister, I guess it is ok that Dixon repeatedly lines her pockets as long as she lies about it you all are ok with that. Dixon did a terrible job at the debate. There is no question about that. She refused to give specifics, because she doesn't have any. Mitchell is the best bet for Baltimore. Accept murder, poor ethics and a terrible education system if you vote for Dixon.
137 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Drop out said:
Conaway's dropping out is like a marathom runner who is 10 miles behind saying, "I choose to drop out for the good of the other runners." In other words, he was a surefire loser so his quitting gains him nothing.
146 agree | 144 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Conaway's sword said:
Well, at least by falling on his sword, as he says, Conaway contributed only to the city's suicide rate, not its homicide rate.
149 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
so conaway drops out. now KM gets additional 5 votes.....
140 agree | 164 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
With Henson on board, we can expect to see a lot more mudslinging at Dixon and other candidates to try and take the heat off Mitchell misusing $56,000 of his campaign funds. This could finally get interesting.
157 agree | 151 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No danger that KM will win. What little money KM hasn't already slipped out of his campaign for hotels and BGE bills, Henson will line his pockets with.
164 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What's really scary is where Henson will end up if M wins.
178 agree | 127 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Didn't Henson have something to do with the Nate Chapman scandal? Glendenning's guy that stole money from the state pension fund? If I'm not mistaken, somehow henson was connected with the guy and he was convicted by the feds a couple of years ago. Henson has a reputation for being ruthless. Maybe that's what the Mitchell campaign needs. The Mitchell's are not very good crooks. They keep getting caught. But, Henson manages to skate through scandal.
196 agree | 159 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
THIEFFER AND JULIUS said:
Birds of a feather flock together. I hope all you Mitchell defenders are paying attention. Mitchell's judgment, character is suspect over $56,000, his family reputation for thievery and corruption, and his decision to spend what remains of his campaign funds on the notoriously unscrupulous Julius Henson.
164 agree | 119 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
William Cooke said:
If I can paraphrase Kang from Tree House of Horrors VII (The Simpsons): "It makes no difference which one of us you vote for. Either way, your city is doomed! Doomed!"
178 agree | 163 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
romana rhyne said:
Actually, I would like Chris Daly to run against Gavin Newsom and give Gavin a run for his money. I will help for free and do strategic planning. But I will support whoever is chosen to get rid of the "Nuisance" to small businesses in the City. My e-mail address is romana94538@yahoo.com Thank you so very much.
260 agree | 212 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree