CHANGE MY LOCATION
Historical society loses grant
SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - D.C. Council members Tuesday erased a $500,000 grant for the Historical Society of Washington, D.C., from the District’s fiscal 2008 budget, a cut the group’s chief called “very serious.”
The society, which operates out of the Carnegie Library in Mount Vernon Square, collects and preserves local Washington history. It also operated the City Museum, a failed venture that opened in 2003 and closed soon afterward.
“What do they do to deserve this money?” asked Ward 8 Council Member Marion Barry, who moved to split the grant between three organizations, including an anti-violence group.
Bell Clement, the society’s executive director, said the organization’s mission is to preserve public history and the government should be in the mix. The group has a good deal of lobbying to do before June 5, she said, when the budget has its final reading.
“It is shocking to us in a way because of course we take it as a given that the history of D.C. is precious and ought to be invested in,” Clement said.
Only Ward 6 Council Member Tommy Wells objected to the cut. Ward 1 Council Member Jim Graham said the society is “not as effective as I’d like to see them.”
Comments from Examiner Readers
8:06 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "Stiller urges common sense, better assessment on grantmakers"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Running a small to medium size non profit organization is potentially more difficult than operating a small to medium profit business.To have the support, investment, and understanding of what it takes to walk in our shoes from major foundations helps sustain non profit execs and boards.It is not easy cobbling together multiple funding streams, finishing the year in the black, reporting out both financial results and program outcomes, supporting a staff and board, and delivering effective front line services to clients, students, etc. Assessment data and outcome measurements are critical to proving that a program or organization has the ability to operate at optimal levels. Adult literacy has received one of the highest rankings (effective) from the federal OMB because of a system of focused and measureable assessments & outcomes. Adult literacy state grantees have, because of proven results, been deemed as a good investment in education. Providers are efficient in delivering outcomes.
152 agree | 167 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree