Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
So it was a surprise to some that Mayor Gavin Newsom’s monthly town-hall meeting turned out to be a protest and poultry-free affair in San Francisco’s West Portal neighborhood Saturday, with those in attendance seeming genuinely happy to have a chance to ask the mayor and a host of department heads about their concerns over local parks, their streets and their personal pet peeves.
The virulent anti-Newsom forces appear to be tired of chasing the mayor around The City — at least based on the “Get Gavin’’ blogs that suggest the mayor’s feathered foes have done all they can to disrupt the official proceedings. Yet it is also somewhat telling that Newsom’s enemies will do anything they can to stop him from a second term, short of the idea of actually convincing someone to run against him.
It is fairly remarkable that here it is, mid-May, and the so-called progressives haven’t found a candidate to run against Newsom, a point that underscores the weakness of their positions. The mayor’s opponents on the Board of Supervisors can play games with The City’s budget to try and force Newsom into a corner. The more radical forces in town can try and stop him from setting up a community court to try and clean up the Tenderloin. But despite all their efforts, they can’t identify anyone who has a decent chance of halting his run for a second term.
And the problem for them just exacerbates over time. The longer they wait for someone to go ahead and try and defy the polls, the tougher it’s going to be to raise enough money to at least make a show of it. Yet all the while, Newsom is in full campaign mode, with the same organization in place that made Care Not Cash his signature success and vaulted him above his contemporaries into the mayor’s job.
In a town where 30 percent of the populace would be against anything — certainly incumbency — one might think that Newsom would be particularly vulnerable now, given his admissions of an affair with a former staffer’s wife and his drinking troubles. Yet that has turned out to be little more than a glitch in his popularity ratings and his opponents have been unable to capitalize.
But it just goes to show how little the “progressives’’ have to show in the way of any concerted leadership. Matt Gonzalez, the Green Party savior who made a valiant run against Newsom, has said he will not jump into the race. Other potential candidates, including Supervisors Aaron Peskin and Chris Daly, rate so poorly in citywide surveys that they know any campaign would be disastrous.
That leaves it up to the Plan B crew, with the most-often mentioned suspects being former Mayor Art Agnos and little-known supervisor Ross Mirkarimi. Agnos is considered by some to be a good sparring partner for Newsom because he is one of the few possible contenders who can cite his experience and maturity as factors for his consideration. But all anyone has to do is see one picture of the homeless tents of “Camp Agnos’’ outside City Hall to see how quickly the Newsom campaign could target Agnos’ effectiveness in dealing with one of San Francisco’s most pressing problems — an issue with which Newsom has high voter confidence.
And that leaves us with the most rumored candidate, Mirkarimi, who is hardly known outside of his very left-leaning District 5, and has few credentials beyond being the person who authored the legislation to allow ambitious politicians to raid The City’s general fund of up to $6 million to run for mayor. If it comes to pass, it could turn out to be among the most self-fulfilling pieces of legislation in city history.
The thinking is that Mirkarimi could run just to build up his name recognition for the mayor’s race in 2011, when every politician still residing in San Francisco will toss their hats into the ring.
Word on the street is that leaders of the left, such as it is, will announce their choice after a special wingding on June 2, almost in time to meet the dog days of summer. The only question is whether they can find more than one candidate, because most political observers believe they need to run several candidates against Newsom under the tortured formula of instant runoff voting — something most voters are hard-pressed to comprehend.
It could be fun — yet another reason for angry citizens to dust off their chicken suits.
Ken Garcia’s column appears Tuesdays, Thursdays and weekends in The Examiner. E-mail him at kgarcia@examiner.com or call him at (415) 359-2663.



Comments from Examiner Readers
9:47 PM MST on Sat., Nov. 22, 2008 re: "Garcia: We'll miss you, Pete"
Report as inappropriate
8:17 AM MST on Fri., Sep. 21, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:23 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 20, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:28 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 19, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:19 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 19, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
12:45 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 16, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:53 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 15, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
11:12 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 13, 2007
re: "Garcia: Resignation request causes wrong uproar"
Report as inappropriate
8:10 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007
re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
6:52 AM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007
re: "Garcia: Hsu saga takes on a bizarre new twist"
Report as inappropriate
2:34 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 6, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
9:25 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 6, 2007
re: "Garcia: Hsu saga takes on a bizarre new twist"
Report as inappropriate
9:00 AM MST on Thu., Sep. 6, 2007
re: "Garcia: Hsu saga takes on a bizarre new twist"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 AM MST on Wed., Sep. 5, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
4:43 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007
re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
10:34 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007
re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
9:12 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007
re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
9:07 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 4, 2007
re: "Garcia: The voodoo that Hsu does"
Report as inappropriate
4:19 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 30, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
2:46 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 30, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
9:26 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Cabbie case highlights S.F.’s taxi scene"
Report as inappropriate
2:23 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
2:19 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
1:30 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
1:22 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
1:14 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
12:04 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
11:05 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
10:32 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
8:31 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "Garcia: Mayoral race an only-in-S.F. circus"
Report as inappropriate
10:19 AM MST on Thu., Aug. 23, 2007
re: "Garcia: Cabbie case highlights S.F.’s taxi scene"
Report as inappropriate
11:54 PM MST on Fri., Aug. 17, 2007
re: "Garcia: The mystery of Ed Jew"
Report as inappropriate
1:45 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 15, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
10:12 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 14, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
3:58 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 14, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
2:16 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 8, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
9:29 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 7, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:58 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
7:55 AM MST on Fri., Aug. 3, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
3:59 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
1:52 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 2, 2007
re: "Garcia: Twisted scandal may have another chapter"
Report as inappropriate
4:11 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 1, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:38 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
11:13 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
8:58 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
8:07 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
7:34 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
7:22 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
7:09 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
6:36 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 31, 2007
re: "Garcia: S.F. politicians tell cops to 'walk the line'"
Report as inappropriate
dennis jones said:
I assume this Pete Wilson is not the former governor of California, right?
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Tyronne Fatsengalla said:
Mayor Newson did mention that if the crime rate didn't fall he would resign. But there was a small disclaimer re: the Tenderloin, Hunter's Point and Western Adition crime. So all is well in SF. Prediction the Homicide (187's) will continue at an alarming rate. I continue to commend the SFPD rank and file who;s hands are tied by City politics. Hopefully no more Officer's will be injured/killed during his administration.
396 agree | 357 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
does anyone remember when gavin said he'd resign if the crime rate didn't fall under his leadership? we're set to surpass last years rate of violent homicides and newsom is asking for everyone else's resignations? i don't get it?
379 agree | 380 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There has never in recent memory been a politician who evokes better the "emperor with no clothes" as Gavin Newsom. Despite having done nothing over 4 years, but look fabulous, people fawn over him as though he were a genuine hero, when in fact he is a celebrity. Yes, here in NORTHERN California, we have succumbed to the cult of celebrity. It no longer is the precinct of Southern Califronia. Fortunately, there are enough right-thinking people throughout California that our beloved mayor will have insufficient play for statewide office. Besides, with such emerging talents as Obama, Gavin's portfolio and his presence are absolutely lightweight and will not withstand scrutiny. Enjoy the next 4 years Gavin, because your trajectory in public service will be mercifully short.
402 agree | 651 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
to hello ken - are you aware that the number of police offciers in SF are diminishing in such numbers that any new recruits cannot get us to even let alone to the staffing level we need to have? Correspondingly, makings cops walk beats further compounds the shortage. Car patrols help the staffing shortage by enabling greater coverage by the same number of cops. Were we to make this compromise of putting cops on a walking beat, there would be a shortage elsewhere that would create crime in these locations.
614 agree | 627 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
hello ken said:
yes ken, we would not want sfpd to get out of their safe, warm cars and walk around alittle.
399 agree | 380 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
L. Amiot said:
Newsom is a coward to treat his appointees like this. His selfishness and narcissism is boundless. He betrays his friends and he betrays his supporters. Somewhere along the line Newsom missed out on learning ethical behavior.
418 agree | 643 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Newsom giddy over firing people? This dude is one sick puppy.
667 agree | 442 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I wouldn't call it voodoo, the fact that Hsu the Fugitive who got away twice in the last week or so... I'd probably call it "incompetence" on the part of the authorities.... then again, seeing as how Hsu has been so generously funding the Clintons , and other Democrats for some years now .. I might call it a "political favor", etc...
398 agree | 393 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Bay Area legal authorities in charge of Hsu couldn't be That Stupid, could they??? Or maybe there is something more sinister at play here....maybe the Lawmen would get more results by investigating some of Hsu's Demorat friends in high places..... there's a tip for you, geniuses...
444 agree | 669 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a lifelong Democrat who was foolish enough to vote for Mayor Newsom the first time around, it will not happen again. Eight years under this mayor will likely leave a san francisco where our unique quality-of- life will be barely recognizable. Unless, of course, a somehow "suburbanized" San Francisco is familiar to you.
401 agree | 613 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hey everybody, Lets all get out the race cards and have another round of You racist.
656 agree | 431 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
A. Perini said:
Hsu is a stooge for the PRC. He mules money to the Dems from their like-minded “One World” colleagues in communist China. The money they send to influence American politics is the cash that we pay for their myriad of inexpensive manufactured items exported by the shipload to the USA. Right now, China owns much of our debt. We are paying for our own destruction. Hsu is but one catalyst that has been spotlighted. In many ways, America is now where Rome was in 400 A.D.
447 agree | 633 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
at least we don't have Willie Brown, around, anymore.
658 agree | 387 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No facts regarding this mans donations have been made and are pure speculative. Until then, he is a naturalized citizen and deserves his right to be innocent. Stop pointing fingers and judging due to his race.
440 agree | 463 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
NO bail should be allowed for this fugitive, but with political connections that he has I will be expecting him to walk free on bail and skip the country.
461 agree | 435 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
unclesmrgol said:
The money Hsu donated does not belong to the candidates to give to whatever charity they will -- it belongs to Hsu's victims, to be restored to them. As of now, the charities chosen by the candidates stand to receive stolen property, and I expect them to behave exactly like the candidates. As false logic would put it, if you give money stolen from a villager back to the village idiot, that's the same as giving it back to the villager who was harmed -- since they are both in the same village.
705 agree | 659 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
the chinacom army has been funneling campaign contributions illegally to their comrades at clinton inc. for almost decades. Can you say ' who's to say what illegal is ?'
663 agree | 417 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
KeenPlanner said:
And watch him get a sweet deal on some valuable presidio land, and watch the presidio trust let him build whatever he wants. It's times like this that it's obvious that the examiner is owned by a right-wing religious extremist. No doubt a good friend of Fisher's.
664 agree | 369 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
sfmike said:
Ken Garcia's p.r. puff piece on Donald Fisher and his third rate modern art collection (but it's worth lots of money!) was genuinely disgusting. Garcia writes, "So despite the off-base criticism of Fisher’s museum plan from the ideologically bound...even a brief glimpse of what awaits the public if the museum opens in three years, as planned, would quicken the pulse of any art lover." I'm an art lover and the pulse isn't racing, especially at the prospect of Warhol portraits of Mick Jagger disfiguring the sylvan setting of the Presidio. And describing Fisher as "a man who made much of his fortune on his canny knack of finding and buying real estate" is a bit coy. It should more truthfully read "a canny knack for finding and buying politicians and hack journalists."
603 agree | 661 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The problem with taxi cabs in San Francisco is there is no competition. We need to eliminate the medallions. Anyone who wants to drive a taxi should apply for a business permit, get a background check, a physical, a drivers license, and an biannual inspection on his taxi. Then go forth and drive. the cream of the crop will rise and the rest will get other jobs. We don't limit the number of restaurants that are in The City why should we limit the number of taxis?
679 agree | 502 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
ed shuck noe valley said:
The good doctor from the Bay View / HP is a serious, sincere candidate. But she will not win outside the Western Addition/Bay View/HP. She has one strong plank and (compared to Gavin) little or no money. But the issue deserves to go forward. The HP toxic clean up is not an issue that Gavin could run against. He would do well to adopt her position or one very similar. There is no more pressing issue that the health crisis in the South East quadrant of the city.
535 agree | 658 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
shortattnspan said:
You can see how dumbed-down America is becoming by reading the comments section of any news site. What's happened to proper English, grammar and spelling? What's happened to actually caring about how you represent yourself and your views? Why do people assume it's okay to use "Net shorthand" during the exchange of supposedly intelligent ideas?
397 agree | 683 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Don't know what i will do said:
I always vote even on off-year elections but this is one year i'm sitting out an election because "frankly i don't give a D***" The city, i feel is on the wrongtrack; we have serious problems and the working middle class is being squeezed but yet nothing is being done. We have a mayor who at first i thought would do a very good job; i'm disappointed' we have a district attorney and when murders are committed she will not seek the death penalty because she is against; well that is just saying "come to sf murderers, murder as many as you want, cause you won't get the death penalty; you most like will sit for 20 years and go on with your lives; the crime rate in SF is out of control, million dollar condos are being built (and the housing market is sinking and the average SF resident, probably can't even afford the down payment) and don't let me get started with MUNI, the homeless, the flighty streets . . .
430 agree | 396 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
EDwin Lee should be banned from SF heis a low down lying money stealing racist lyer and him Mohammad Nuru ha swiped the city cleaned
631 agree | 628 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
if the SF public re elects Gavin Nuisance then ot me that says it all we don't really cxare about our lives. Nuisance is the pits, worst I ever seen he is a follower drug user, and he is a cheater
415 agree | 394 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There are no serious candidates for Mayor other than Newsom. There are no serious issues for the progressives to tout that aren't being addressed by the current administration. If there were, I am sure that the Greens would be running a legitimate candidate for mayor. Why else would they? Maybe Matt Gonzalez hasn't raised enough money suiing the City to put on a decent campaign. Maybe they don't want to damage their inflated opinions of themselves. Maybe they prefer to sit on the sidelines until "the time is right". Maybe it easier to complain without coming up with solutions. Maybe they have no guts to take on a difficult task.
455 agree | 614 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ken, you are a total Newsom flunkie. You don't even try. There are serious issues in the city. And there are serious candiates. Most importantly, Newsom through his handlers, minions, political consultants are trying to destroy his opponents and this city. Won't it be funny when he loses?
448 agree | 392 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I live in District 6, a place where my representative believes that if i plant a tree on the street, sweep up my block, paint out graffiti, organize a crime watch, call the police, then I "rich and callous" and trying to gentrify the area. Excuse me, I was born in the city in 1954, went to public schools and still live here. If we have District representatives then we need someone who represents all people in our District. Right now the system is really broken. I have talked to my neighbors and the gut feeling is that we might as well have city wide elected supervisors.
659 agree | 608 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am not sure why a no name reporter finds it hard to understand that some citizens in San Francisco actual care about the future of San Francisco. And are willing to engage in the political process and become a challenger in the Mayoral race. Making fun of these individuals does not change the facts that San Francisco has serious problems that need fixing buy those who care.
728 agree | 369 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
Ed Jew has a medallion. But it must be in Burlingame, because still you can't get a taxicab in the Sunset no matter how many times you call.
461 agree | 440 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
mendez said:
with all this legal foot dragging going around with Ed, they might as well let this Jew go scot free.
851 agree | 665 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Will Clark Rules said:
Don't you guys remember Dennis Peron? For most advocates the whole concept of medical marijuana dispensaries was a means to the true end... legalized dealing. Most of the original advocates admitted this from the very start. It was never about helping sick people - it was about legalizing pot. Most of us who voted for prop 215 knew this as well. And look at how it turned out!
675 agree | 461 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Only god can save you said:
when you have to take the highway, but you are stuck in traffic. So, if you want another Katrina situation, just avoid traffic issues. and if you want it not, you could just listen to the wispers of the asphalt. unfortunately, the wispers are gone into the wind
704 agree | 462 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
any word on supervisor sandoval censorship rally of micheal savage at the radio station.sounds like the left just turned far right or met in the middle
486 agree | 476 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Vandallay. Really?
419 agree | 414 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Leadership is lacking in Room 200 of City Hall, the Board of Supes, the Police Dept, the DA's Office, and in the Courts. We have inexperienced, incapable, fearful people in key positions in our city government infrastructure. How did this happen? Apathy, lazy, frightened, ignorant constiuency, aggressive ill-planned social engineering, advocate judges, and big money pulling the strings. Without credible, honest, ethical, courageous leadership, this city will founder. Dr SS Van Nostrum, from the Institute
493 agree | 460 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is what the citzens of San Francisco wanted when they voted for the mayor and board of Supes...Why are they complaining now??? You all got what you wanted..Police Reform...Enjoy...
589 agree | 457 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Arrests-down, traffic citations-down, officer iniatated activities-down, field interoogation stops-down, response time to crimes in progress -up, staffing-down,political interference-up,morale-down,promotional opportunities-non existent, recruitment of highly qualified members-down, recovery of stolen autos-down, follow up investigations of felonies-down, decision making, leading, and managaing the Department-sub zero. community policing strategies-below sea level, and the list goes on. Who's to blame_________________________?? Arthur Vandallay, Hunters Point.....
732 agree | 471 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
A suggestion... Get rid of the Police Chief's position and let the Mayor/Chief directly call the shots for the police department. You would have the same results and save the city $200,000+ per year!
741 agree | 649 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Interesting perspective on Ruby Tourk. I hope she does come out swinging, or at least doesn't cower into oblivion or stay silent out of fear of the "City Hall Machine" If she's got something to say she should say it.
535 agree | 731 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
eyeopener said:
Where does Garcia get his information? Dillon was well liked in D5, though some say not as effective as he could have been. The supes try to make improvements, but their hands are tied. Most of the problems here are top down. Fong is a weak leader, and the mayor only cares about looking good. meanwhile, drug dealers reside and do business unencumbered in public housing. The mayor does nothing. The housing authority does nothing. young people continue to die on the streets. i guess if the problems are not happening to rich, white people in the marina, it doesn't really matter.
666 agree | 464 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
body part said:
no matter what the branch of civil servancy any of them are from, they will eventually run into City Hall politics. you have to play ball according to the calls of the higher-ups. I'm sure the top brasses don't have a clear picture what the lower brasses are doing, but if you're a cop these days in a new era, you have to bend with the politics, good or bad. whether it makes sense or not. I've spoken with cops before - do your twenty or so, get out and retire into the sunset. city hall employees are there for exactly that reason alone.
483 agree | 500 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gretchen said:
The police department has been understaffed for years because our "progressive" Supervisors kept taking the money for police recruit classes and spending it on other things - usually the homeless. Whether the police are on foot, in cars, on bikes or even horses, the police are understaffed thanks to the Supes, and without enough police, they can't be everywhere all the time - they have to jump from one hot spot to another. So, you can complain about the Mayor or the Police Chief if you want to, but the real problem has been that money requested to support police and crime prevention has been held hostage by the Board of Supervisors. This month Chris Daly campaigned up to the last minute to cut over $30 million from the budget to fund his pet projects. $3,000,000 of that would have been taken from the Police department. Fortunately saner minds prevailed and the police budget wasn't cut so we can expect more police to be available once they get through the academy.
453 agree | 513 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The blame is Mayor G Newson, Police Commission, and the Command Staff. The rank and file are hard working men and woman. Period.... Tom Del Torre
772 agree | 478 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
there have been shootings recently , and other crimes where the foot beats have been nearby (close enough to hear the shots) but the suspects got away cause the cops were on foot. I know many officers who have never walked a foot beat but sometime they get the information on a crime before dispaych sets up the call. many times i can call them and find out what happened and why and by whom. walking a beat will not get you to now the community talking to them will. you can talk to them if you drive or walk. There are many who should think about changeing jobs or thier supervisor should stick a foot up thier butts to get them to do thier job . thats where the reforms need to be.
882 agree | 541 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
out of the last three chiefs ive only seen fong at my station twice. Never have seen a supervisor or commisioner. I know that cpatians are telling their lts not to say anything about the foot beats and the staffing. they are told that if they are short to call other stations for help. What happens when the city is short do we ask daly city for help?
495 agree | 465 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Boehmer said:
Several years ago, I had to go to Central Police Station to find out about one of my Clients suffering from Dementia who had wondered off. I watched the general activity as I sat, observed and just waited. I was impressed with the amount of responsibility our Police are required to undertake. I wonder if any of the idealistic politicians and Mayor have ever spent time in one of our District Police Stations-saying nothing-just observing. I think by spending time-observing the amount of activity and Police Direction should prove to them that our Police have both a never-ending challenging and difficult period when it comes to their daily responsibilities as directed by their Captain and/or Lieutenants. There is no doubt that our Mayor and Supervisors would put aside their Progressive Thinking and become more realistic.
553 agree | 870 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
These new rounds of foot beats came from the mayors office to out do the supervisor plan. We are so short now that we sometimes only have one car to patrol the entire district. Its a joke. We get calls at our station two or three times a day from the fitfh floor saying that the MAyors office called and they want the homeless moved from (,,,,,,NAme your place). If the Mayor dosent want the homeless in sight he should make a law outlawing it. They made it sound as if these new foot beats would be filled with new people from the academy....there has not been a class since June 1st...we are way too short to staff them all safely. Nobody minds walking a beat but we want to be safe.
464 agree | 687 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Knot2brite said:
In a Democracy such as ours it is the ELECTED government's responsibility to decide how any department should do their job, including POLICE DEPARTMENT. Why is that so diffficult for the Officers of the SFPD to understand? Some people seem to believe we'd be better off if it were (IS?) the other way around.
559 agree | 501 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree