Sports Examiners bring you the local angle on your favorite teams:

Los Angeles Examiners

Colin Ward-Henninger
Los Angeles Lakers Examiner
Most Recent Post
Lakers overcome turkey hangover, improve to 14-1
Des Martini
Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim Examiner
Most Recent Post
Hello CC Sabathia? Goodbye Jered Weaver?
 
 

Multimedia News

This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...
Healthy holiday recipes
20 photos
Just when you think there's nothing healthy a...

Will RFK Stadium ever get to see a no-hitter?

May 15, 2007 12:00 AM (567 days ago) by Phil Wood, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The history of RFK Stadium as a venue for major league baseball comes to an end this year. By my count, a total of 1,045 big league contests that counted will have been played there by Sept. 23, the day it’s scheduled to close — not counting those old timer’s games of the 1980s or various preseason exhibitions. Despite all of those opportunities — that’s 2,090 starting pitchers — it’s a good bet we’ll never see a no-hitter.

For reasons known only to whatever entity is pulling the strings, and despite its reputation as being something less than a hitter’s park, Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium remains an impossible place to get 27 outs without something falling in. Three times this season alone, Nats’ starters have gotten past the point of an official game — five innings — without giving up a hit, only to have fate step in and snatch glory away, and not too kindly.

Last night Jason Bergmann nearly had the right stuff. Carrying a no-hitter into the eight, only to see it slip away on a Brian McCann homer two pitches into the inning.

Saturday, April 28, against the Mets, righthander Jerome Williams goes five hitless innings. Williams, a reclamation project, comes into the game 0-4 with an ERA of 7.77 — not exactly the stuff legends are made of, but when it comes to no-hitters, precisely the type of guy to pull it off. Williams, a classically bad-hitting pitcher, comes within a few inches of homering in the bottom of the fifth, and has to settle for a long single. As a baserunner, he then slides into second to break up a double play, and in the bargain, sprains his ankle. He tries to pitch in the sixth, gives up a hit and a walk, and is taken out in a game the Nats eventually lose 6-2. Adding insult to injury, he has to go on the 15-day disabled list, and hasn’t pitched since.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Last Friday Shawn Hill, who has emerged as the staff ace, is perfect for four innings against Florida. He allows a couple of walks in the fifth but no hits, and then, after coming out to warm up in the sixth, feels discomfort in his right elbow and has to leave the game. He’s also likely headed for the DL, just as Williams is coming back. At least the Nats won that one, the beginning of a weekend sweep of the Marlins.

It doesn’t take a great pitcher to throw a no-hitter. Sure, Hall of Famer Nolan Ryan had seven of them, but Bill Stoneman, a 54-85 career pitcher, had a pair. Wilson Alvarez threw one in his first big league start, and Roger Clemens has never thrown one. There’s really no rhyme or reason.

Only a single official no-hitter has occurred within the confines of the District, and I’d be surprised if anyone is still around who saw it. Nats’ southpaw Bobby Burke no-hit Boston on Aug. 8, 1931 in front of about 3,000 fans at Griffith Stadium. The best pitched game at RFK happened Thursday, Aug. 13, 1970. The Senators sent Dick Bosman out to face Minnesota’s Jim Kaat. Bosman allowed a leadoff bunt single to Cesar Tovar and a sixth inning walk to Kaat, but faced only 28 batters in a 1-hit, 1-0 win. Bosman would go on to pitch a no-hitter in 1974 for Cleveland against Oakland.

The window of opportunity is fast closing for a no-hitter at RFK, and judging by Williams’ and Hill’s experience this year, somebody somewhere really doesn’t want it to happen.

Phil Wood appears Saturdays at 11 a.m. on MASN and weekly on Comcast SportsNet’s WPL through the World Series.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

6:33 PM MST on Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 re: "‘The 21st Century Ripken’"

Examiner Reader said:
There are many Nationals fans who are still patient with the team. I remember how Edward Bennett Williams as well as Peter Angelos tried---and failed---to build a winner with the Orioles by buying free agents. But my biggest nightmare is that once Zimmerman's contract runs out, he will sign a lucrative deal with another club because (a) the Lerners are unwilling to pay the money to keep him when they have the chance, (b) Zimmerman has no faith that the franchise will become a playoff contender anytime in his career, or (c) all of the above. Maybe the Lerners are smart by forcing Zimmerman to prove his worth this year, but if he has a breakout year and then flies the coop like Alfonso Soriano, fans' faith in The Plan will vanish like the wind. Edward J. Cunningham Rockville, MD

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:00 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Don’t panic yet"

Examiner Reader said:
Gee, Phil, thanks. I'm glad you reminded us that we're all raving idiots and that you have been appointed by MENSA to set us straight. "It’s perfectly plain that the issue is offense." I'm glad we have an "expert" like you to tell us this. Hm. All along, I thought the problem was that Nationals Park doesn't have enough cupholders!!!

7 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:34 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Don’t panic yet"

Examiner reader said:
Phil, is it ok for fans who call in to your radio show to comment on the Nats' play? Or are they also ignorant folks who know nothing about facts or logic?

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:18 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Don’t panic yet"

Examiner reader said:
What an arrogant, condescending column this is. Fans shouldn't comment about and criticize the team because they don't know enough about baseball? Fans don't know what's going on in the dugout or in the clubhouse? Well why don't you tell us then, Phil, and disabuse us of our shallow, uninformed nonsense. And most fans agree that Lenny Harris did a terrific job last year? Really? Maybe it is you who is uninformed, Phil. (And anyway, who cares what the uninformed *fans* think?) Did you know that the Nats came very close in the offseason to not retaining Harris because they thought that he did not do a good job and was not ready to be a major league hitting coach?

9 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:59 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 13, 2007 re: "New park feels like home already"

natsbaseball.com said:
Thanks Phil. Sounds wonderful - can't wait to see it. Being about the same age I remember attending the first baseball game at DC Stadium after experiencing Griffith for one or two seasons as a young child. It was a world of improvement over the falling down older park. After baseball returned 34 years later and about 15 years of going to Camden, RFK was, of course, kind of stark (I think is was designed by Joseph Stalin) but we all knew it was temporary and to have a home team again we would have put up with a lot worse. My only regret is the new stadium is in a location that couldn't be harder to get to for most of the area's fans. People are whining about the lack of parking - but it doesn't matter as there are no roads. Metro is bragging about being able to carry about 10,000 fans and hour. Since most of the 41,000 fans who could show up will have to go by metro - I cringe at the 4 hour trips it will take to get home. In that regard RFK had it all over the new park.

103 agree | 97 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:20 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 3, 2007 re: "Expect Bowden, Nats to make significant noise in the offseason"

kjack said:
Another great article Phil. Why those idiots at espn[The world wide leader in crap]and fox don't hire informed,aware, and intelligent individuals like you. To inform the general public of the things that really matter in baseball. I'll personalll never understand.

192 agree | 214 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:02 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 2, 2007 re: "Expect Bowden, Nats to make significant noise in the offseason"

EdDC said:
Phil, What do you think of going after Coco Crisp? He is still young and had back to back .300 seasons not long ago in Cleveland. Nats need a CF. Crisp didn't do much in BoSox pressure cooker, like Wily Mo Pena. So Crisp might benefit from just relaxing, knowing the world is not on his shoulders. His contract is reasonable: Covelli Crisp of 3 years/$15.5M (2007-09), plus $8M 2010 club option As to Bowden, I like him asking for the world. He tries hard and contacts many many teams, and if one or two bite, then Nats come out ahead. This is better than just trading to make trades.

244 agree | 227 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:12 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 11, 2007 re: "Perhaps it’d be better to keep Young around"

Pope John Paul Ringo George said:
"Did you ever hear any specific player’s names that would’ve ended up here in exchange for the Fonz?" This is a poor argument. The reason the Nats never get serious offers in trade for Soriano, Dmitri, Cordero, Rauch, etc is becuase Bowden's asking price is not serious. He makes it known that you can only trade for a Nat if you're willing to be ripped off in the trade. His asking price starts so high, teams won't even attempt to negotiate with him. Then he comes back and says "hey, we never got any serious offers!" No sane, competent GM will ever trade with him on anyting above replacement level players.

278 agree | 230 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:47 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "Orioles could repeat managerial history with Trembley"

Norm said:
Trembley has got this team behind him. I like his vision. You can see it in the way this team is playing since he replaced Perlozzo. The Weaver like experience you cite nails it and is a huge bonus. It's precisely what the O's need to get to the next level. The way I see it, NONE of the other current candidates brings anything comparable to the table. With McPhail and Trembley, we are already on the right track.

303 agree | 799 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:52 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "A long, winding road from Baltimore"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree in that the Orioles should trade for Teixeira. There will be many teams after him. The "Dallas News" has an article that Boston, Dodgers, and Tigers may be interested. We should offer Cabrera, and two other players. Texas needs a starting pitcher. In the article he says the other teams would offer a pitching prospect. At least Cabrera has pitched in the majors the last three years. The Orioles would be set for the next 8 years at first base. That would be a nice infield. Also, go get Torri Hunter next year in free agency for center field.

350 agree | 263 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:07 PM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "O's game gives umps a black eye"

Dan said:
So is MLB saying that the score of a game has no impact on strategy? As far as Jay's comment: "The rules were followed." I don't think I ever read anywhere in the MLB rule book where you can score a run while you are on defense. The apeal was not that the run should not count, but that it is not fair to the Tribe that the run was awarded 3 innings after the fact. Contrary to MLB I beleive that the score of the game is the #1 item that determines strategy. The Tribe was denied 3 innings of basing their strategy on the current situation. my thought is that the game should be continued from the point where the controversial run scored, with Baltimore leading 3 to 1. In every other instance I can recall you must apeal a decision before the next pitch. Runner leaves too early when tagging up. Appeal has to be made before next pitch. G Brett's infamouse non home run? Had to be apealed before next pitch. Same for runner missing a base. O's did not raise issue for 3 inn, but thats O

298 agree | 286 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:21 AM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "A black eye for umps"

Jay said:
The run counted, why are you crying? The rules were followed, and the Indians are tryng to get by on a technicality, shame in them...very unsportsmanlike

387 agree | 301 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement