Multimedia News

This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...
Healthy holiday recipes
20 photos
Just when you think there's nothing healthy a...

Teachers union vows organization on charters

May 3, 2007 12:00 AM (579 days ago) by Bill Myers, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The American Federation of Teachers, one of the nation’s most aggressive unions, promised to revive its efforts to organize staff in the nation’s charter schools — a decision that could make D.C. a union battleground for years to come.

The District of Columbia-based AFT promised to “intensify” its efforts in the burgeoning charter schools.

“They want to have a voice and a fair salary and benefits and ways to improve the teaching and instruction,” AFT spokeswoman Janet Bass said.

Bass refused to say whether her union was organizing in D.C., but the city has the second-highest concentration of charter schools outside of New Orleans. It is also a city that is traditionally friendly to organized labor.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Private groups run charter schools, which are exempt from most labor laws that cover employees of the traditional public schools

The teachers’ union already represents the 3,800 teachers in D.C.’s public schools. The swelling enrollment in charter schools — by 2014, there may be more students in charter schools than in traditional D.C. schools — make the charters a contentious field for the AFT.

Locally, the teachers’ union is still trying to recover from the scandal-plagued leadership of Barbara Bullock. In 2003, Bullock pleaded guilty to bilking the union out of millions for lavish personal expenses, including a closet full of wigs.

bmyers@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

2:13 PM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "County workers union rejects pension changes"

Examiner Reader said:
I am not sure where Ms. Malarkey is getting her information from, There is no "Law requiring governments to prefund retirement benefits." There is however GASB which is an accounting standard that has governments accounting for and paying for other post employment benefits, ie. health care, so they will be able to maintain their AAA bond ratings. Within GASB there is no mention of pensions. I sure do wish that reporters would verify their facts prior to printing such information. It should also be noted that this article depicts the union memebers in a positive light, which is good, but recent artcles about the BCFPE appeared to show the union as the "BAD GUYS". Thank you Ms. Malarkey for your true and honest information. Not.

225 agree | 211 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:24 AM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "County workers union rejects pension changes"

Examiner Reader said:
finaly, a union that has sence to protect their members rather than line the pockets of a few. Thank You ASCME How many of the members of the other Unions voted to ratify because they were strong armed . Every employee out there should be writing to their Councilman right now and letting them know how this retirement proposal affects their family .and demand that the portion affecting prior and existing employees be removed..not approved, whether you voted to ratify or not.

216 agree | 238 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 4, 2007 re: "Union rejects health care offer"

Examiner Reader said:
I am a little confused by Johnny Olzewski's comment --- The future action hings on the FPE vote? There are 6 unions in Baltimore County, why does the future of all employees depend on this one vote? The contract was ratified by a vote of 152 to 146! Since the majority of the members (corrections and 911) were given a two step upgrade, those numbers say a lot. 146 people were willing to give up the upgrades to protect their benefits. And what about the other 1300 employees represented by this union, many who are on the low end of the pay scale and can not afford to join for the right to vote. These changes affect them also. Remember councilman, you are in an elected position. These are not just employees, they are tax payers!

234 agree | 219 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement