Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., announced Tuesday that they will take up the cause of enfranchisement, two weeks after a bipartisan voting rights measure was passed out of the House of Representatives. Lieberman has long been a supporter, but Hatch’s backing was deemed critical, what Lieberman called a “breakthrough,” to the legislation’s survival.
“Today, we have an historic opportunity finally to bestow upon the citizens of the District of Columbia the civic entitlement every other tax-paying American citizen enjoys no matter where he or she resides, and that is democracy's most essential right, voting representation in Congress,” Lieberman said during a news conference on Capitol Hill.
Both the House and Senate bills expand the House by two seats, one for the heavily Democratic District and the other for Hatch’s Republican-leaning Utah, which narrowly lost out on a fourth seat following the 2000 Census.
“This is a historic time for D.C. citizens and a unique opportunity for Utah to receive its long-overdue fourth congressional seat,” Hatch said.
There is a key difference between the measures, however: Under the House bill, Utah’s fourth seat would be statewide — safeguarding the state’s one Democratic congressman — whereas the Senate measure would redraw the map to establish a new fourth district.
DC Vote Executive Director Ilir Zherka said his advocacy organization “will work with our allies in both chambers and off the Hill to enact a bill that reconciles those differences.”
The Senate legislation will be directed to the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, which Lieberman chairs. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. opposes the measure.
“I hope that nobody will filibuster this bill,” Hatch said. “It ought to be voted up or down.”
Critics, most from the GOP, argue the Constitution allows representation only “for the people of the several states,” and D.C. is not a state. Supporters, meanwhile, say the Constitution provides Congress broad authority over the nation’s capital.
D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D, and Virginia Rep. Tom Davis, R, co-sponsors of the House bill, both applauded the quick introduction of the Senate measure.
mneibauer@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
8:29 PM MST on Fri., Sep. 26, 2008 re: "Civil rights groups ‘outraged’ by absentee voting problems"
Report as inappropriate
2:16 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 6, 2008
re: "Vote tallying could present another fiasco"
Report as inappropriate
11:55 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 6, 2007
re: "Virginia primaries open to all voters, regardless of party"
Report as inappropriate
2:07 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 20, 2007
re: "House passes District voting rights bill"
Report as inappropriate
ilsun said:
. DEAR SIR/MADAM I SUPPORT THE WORLDWIDE CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE AND ABUSE USING DIRECTED ENERGY AND NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS I would like to draw your attention to some extreme and horrendous criminality being conducted with the involvement of United States Government-related Agencies and the complicity, if not participation, of many other governments and security agencies. I am a victim of torture and abuse using DIRECTED ENERGY and NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS technology. The criminal use of these on me are causing the following effects - 1. Sleep deprivation 2. Reading thoughts remotely 3. Causing pain in any nerve of the body 4. Computer- brain interference, control and communication. There is massive ignorance and secrecy regarding this, and victims such as I are being subjected to uncontrolled and unacknowledged torture and mental and physical destruction. This has remained completely unreported and undiscussed publicly. There are many others, all over the world, who ar
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jiminy Cricket said:
What a wicked we weave !!!- The Supes were warned not to buy these bogus systems - but except for Ammiano and Daly, they did it anyway .. The shame !! Now SF is the biggest fool as they too are in the HAVA trap - Bob Ney paved the way for the big $ vendors to skim the cream - billions of our tax dollars sent to the boys in the back. We must make a stand against the black hats and take back our democracy- He who counts the votes must not be allowed to skate away- JC
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Steve Rankin, Jackson, Mississippi said:
The Virginia Republicans' lawsuit against their open-primary law is now in the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond. It's based largely on the US Supreme Court's 2000 ruling in the California case that you noted. The lower court held in the Virginia case that, when a party is forced to nominate by primary, the party decides who votes in that primary. This was the first time any court had ever said that there is a situation in which the state may not require a party to hold an open primary. The Mississippi Democrats' similar open-primary lawsuit will be heard by the US District Court on July 30. If the courts outlaw state-mandated open primaries-- as I believe they will-- each party will be free to determine who votes in its primaries. Utah, e.g., registers voters by party. The Republicans there invite independents to vote in their primaries, whereas the Democrats invite ALL voters into their primaries.
407 agree | 478 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Zeadman said:
mmmmmmmmmm interesting. i am a republican populist moderate. i think that most people in the us are now that. any way i believe that the district should be treated as any other district in any state in the Union. it is a district just like the first district of Utah. or Iowa or Idaho...... so yes it is good that they now have a vote even thow they have always had a vote because of what they are. they are a district out side of a state. thats is all they deserve a vote just like us. thanks -Zeadman
278 agree | 295 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree