Examiner.com // 1 hr 35 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL // 3 hrs ago
ABC7.com // 4 hrs ago
Los Angeles Times // 4 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 4 hrs ago
Examiner.com // 4 hrs ago
Daily News // 6 hrs ago
Daily News // 6 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 6 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 6 hrs ago
 
   
Volunteers flock to plant trees along Rock Creek’s banks
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The sun glistened off the waters at the banks of Rock Creek on Sunday morning as dozens of volunteers came to plant 1,000 saplings along the river as part of the National Zoo’s Earth Day celebration.

Community members and government officials gathered on the balmy morning to both enjoy the zoo and help the environment.

“I’m having so much fun,” 9-year-old Girl Scout Autumn Michmillan said as she dug out a small hole from the ground to plant her tree. “I get to plant trees and help the environment and animals.”

The National Zoo hosted the event to encourage volunteerism.

“This morning gives people an action step,” National Zoo Executive Director Bob Lamb said. “Children will come back and say ‘I planted that tree.’ ”

Environmental Protection Agency employees, including Deputy Administrator Marcus Peacock, joined other volunteers in planting trees.

“People get a sense of results for what they're doing,” Peacock said. “This is evidence to me that there's really been a shift. This country is getting greener and greener.”

The saplings included 21 different species of trees native to the region. Although this is the first year the zoo has held tree planting on Earth Day, Lamb said the event falls into a wider effort by the zoo to encourage conservation in peoples’ everyday lives.

“Tree planting is a wonderful thing,” Lamb said. “But we’re really trying to connect it to people's lives and have them take a look at daily things like the type of packaging they use.”


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

1:00 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008 re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"

Examiner Reader said:
How about charging these people that live on the water some more money called taxes? I cant get near the water everyday like they do and catch those crabs free because no one is watching there piers. Yea. how about charging them boat owners some more money with them polluting the water with there gas mowers. I lucky I can find a nice spot to fish and I have to pay for my licence. Charge them for the filty/dirty bay.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:41 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"

Examiner Reader said:
Whip Allan Kittleman says it will cost the rate payers more. So it might, buig deal, i'd rather pay a little more than pay huge expenses down the road to clean all the crap up thats left behing from power plants. Stuff like coal tar is nasty and i'm sure there are worse by products. Lets just ticket those littering? and if it's your responsibility to clear snow from your sidewalk in the einter, than so be it trash during the rest of the year.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:15 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"

Examiner Reader said:
A bottle bill will do nothing to fix the ignorant masses that have absolutely no qualms about littering whatsoever. One of the things that flabbergasted me when I moved here from out west in 1991 was how cavalier people are with garbage and cigarette butts. I was speaking to a lady from Ethiopia not long ago who told me that she gets embarrassed when her family visits her from there and comments about how dirty this city is. That says volumes to me. I am not always a Sheila fan, but I do respect that she is trying to address this problem.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:32 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"

Examiner Reader said:
Maybe we can pass the Bottle Bill next year so that there is a greater incentive for people to pick up litter and then the streams wouldn't look so bad...

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:29 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"

Examiner Reader said:
Thanks for raising public awareness of the problems of our streams and Patapsco River, as well as the rest of the Chesapeake Bay watershed! And thanks for getting the facts correct! Betsy McMillion, Stream Watch Director Friends of Patapsco Valley & Heritage Greenway

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:23 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"

A giraffe dies said:
To a large extent a part of the problem is the residents' attitude towards littering and illegal dumping. I believe there is a state law against littering with fines attached, however I do not think the police is enforcing it in Baltimore City. Not a day goes by where I don't see at least one car window roll down and a bag of fast food trash is dumped on the street or see alleys with bags of trash piled. If the city really wants to increase revenues, a law should be passed making littering a crime with a $500 penalty for each occurence. Then, instead of setting up traffic traps all over town, the police can just issue littering tickets. If the problem doesn't stop, at least Baltimore's finances will be in the positive without taxing everyone exorbitantly.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:10 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"

Reader said:
What ever you say 10:55, You are the man!

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:55 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"

Tammy Newcomer said:
Thanks for such a comprehensive piece on the complex issues surrounding water quality in the Bay region. The statistics at the end are particularly enlightening; Our population size has not increased as dramatically as the opulence of our lifestyles. The American Dream of a big house in the suburbs (with easy access to roads and strip malls) is having a detrimental affect on water quality and general quality of life. More and more former forests and farmlands are being paved over and as a result the waterways are being eroded and citizens are wasting more time sitting in traffic. I hope this article will serve as food for thought on changing the way we grow. We need to curtail sprawl fueled by roads like the planned ICC and instead, focus on improving pre-existing urban areas so they are safer, more attractive places to live. Urban redevelopment is an important strategy for protecting the headwater forests that protect the water quality of everyone living within our watersheds.

8 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)