
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Democrats and Republicans in Congress have stolen each other’s political playbooks this year.
Democrats, wounded in the past by accusations that they were guilty of “obstructionism,” are now levying that very charge against the Republican minority in the Senate.
Republicans, meanwhile, are ridiculing Democrats for presiding over a “do-nothing” Congress, a charge that Democrats used in their campaigns against Republicans to win control in November’s elections.
The latest dust–up was over this week’s bill to authorize funding for the national intelligence services. Republicans blocked the bill because it would require President Bush to reveal information about interrogation techniques at prisons for terrorist suspects.
“Democrats are leading the fight to make America safer and support our troops,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. “But the Republican minority has once again irresponsibly blocked the progress that the American people and a bipartisan majority in the Senate seek.”
Republicans used this very charge in the 2004 elections to significantly widen their majority and topple the Democratic leader, former Sen. Tom Daschle of South Dakota.
“While they talk tough on national security, Republicans’ action tell another story,” Reid said this week. “Their obstructionism is endangering national security. Democrats will continue to fight to make America more secure.”
Raising a Democratic complaint from last year’s elections, Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., accused Democrats of trying to silence the minority.
“If the minority is shut out of debate, it will block legislation until its members are respected and their voices given an opportunity to be heard,” McConnell said.
So far this year, Reid has moved 21 times to force an end to debate on legislation so that a final vote can be taken. The procedure — known as filing cloture — is usually an option of last resort and requires 60 votes to succeed.
“At this rate, we’ll have 160 cloture motions by the end of the 110th Congress,” McConnell said. “This would shatter the old record of 82 back in 1995 and 1996.”
The next Senate showdown is expected Wednesday on a proposal to modify the Medicare prescription drug program. The bill would allow the federal government to set drug prices.
Democrats say it will force lower drug prices for seniors, but Republicans warn it will limit the drugs available to them.
churt@dcexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
4:06 PM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007 re: "Congress loads up $20 billion in pork"
Report as inappropriate
5:49 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 30, 2007
re: "Congress sidesteps dire warnings on Social Security and Medicare"
Report as inappropriate
3:03 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 30, 2007
re: "Congress sidesteps dire warnings on Social Security and Medicare"
Report as inappropriate
wayne hutchings said:
the dems throw out their chests, decry the war, get the pork and prove they are the same as the neocons
289 agree | 292 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Fixing Social Secuirty is a breeze--and no reductions in benefits or increase in retirement age is necessary. You make it a true defined benefit pension system by changing PayGo to actuarial advance funding using an actuarial cost method called Entry Age Normal. This will allow you to invest a substantial part of the assets in stocks or stock like investments once the short term cash outflows are taken care of by Treasuries. The excess of stock returns long term over Treasury bills is huge--around 6-7% per year. Compunded annually it makes all the difference. I estimate that we already have enough money in Treasuries--around 2 trillion dollars and this is around 4 times one year's cah payout--more than enough. In fact, the SS actuaries forecasts show we do not need any more money until about 2041, or around 34 years from now. For example, just put an additional $50 billion a year into the system and invest it all in a low-cost broad based stock index fund, and that will fix it!
294 agree | 334 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's a shame and a disgrace how our people in Wash. D.C. seem to avert the Social Security and Medicare issues. Then again, why should they be concerned they will not have to rely on either of the two issues and I am sure they will syphon off funds for "more pressing" concerns. The Seniors don't seem to count and are more of a liability than they used to be,
289 agree | 265 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree