Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Pension liability widens

Apr 5, 2007 12:00 AM (607 days ago) by Stephen Janis, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Despite a slight increase in investment income and assets, the underfunded liability for the Baltimore City Employees Retirement System continued to grow in 2006, prompting questions from council members during an annual review at City Hall on Wednesday.

“When is the bleeding going to end?” Council Vice President Robert Curran asked.

Council members peppered the board with questions as officials explained that several years of poor investment performance continue to put pressure on pension finances.

“The city contribution to the fund is up significantly this year — nearly 30 percent — are we looking at a trend?” asked City Councilwoman Helen Holton, chairwoman of the Taxation and Finance Committee, which oversees city pension funds.

This story continues below
Advertisement

Kenneth Kent, an actuarial advisor for the city, said the growth in the city’s underfunded liability — $119 million in 2006, up from $63 million in 2005 — was the result of several years of investment losses, as well as an increase in the number of city employees living longer. Still, officials said, the city’s contributions will continue to rise.

“We are probably going to have to continue to contribute more money,” said Raymond Wackes, city budget director.

Payments to all city pension funds, including firefighters and police, are slated to rise 17 percent to $118 million in fiscal 2008.

The report said ERS’ net assets increased $45 million in 2006. The fund also increased payments to retirees by $2.5 million.

ERS Chairwoman Roselyn Spencer said the fund is on solid footing compared to other pension funds.

“Pension funds all over the country are struggling; in the scheme of things we are doing well,” she said.

Despite the shortfalls, Spencer said her investment strategy would remain conservative. “We’re trying to hit singles and doubles — not home runs,” she said.

sjanis@balimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

1:59 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 31, 2008 re: "City faces $2.9 billion gap in retiree health benefits"

Examiner Reader said:
Oh sure, raise my taxes. It doesn't matter that I have no retirement plan. That I have worked since I was 16 years old, not including babysitting when I was younger that 16. All the hardworking state employees, I say hard working because I see them napping in yellow trucks, deserve a big fat retirement check. And the city employees, with all the hard work they do by shopping using city credit cards is tiring. They deserve it also! Take my money, what little I have left.

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:01 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 25, 2008 re: "Howard considering trust fund for retiree benefits obligation"

Not surprised said:
Retirement should be in 401K plans. With the county and the employee contributing. Then there would be no unfunded liability!

32 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:11 AM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007 re: "More than $10M set aside for retiree benefits"

Examiner Reader said:
Baltimore County's website makes no mention of a 5 % penalty , nor does it tell you how they aren't finish yet... if this information is true then employees who have been loyal and hard working are to be pusished for their committment. If the Administration and Council and Govenment on all levels really are so worried about the system , then perhaps they should show how much they care about all of their constituens out here in the communities it by reaching into thier own retirement systems/pockets and pay into the Social Security System. and Retirement system and cut their pays.. Excuse me, but it would seem that we have elected people who have no problem taking pensions from workers who are the backbone of the entire system....yet..pay nothing themselves... I think that perhaps it may be time that government "for the people" replaces "by the people" with "real people."

159 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:58 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 20, 2007 re: "More than $10M set aside for retiree benefits"

Examiner Reader said:
Howard County's approach to funding their retirement liability is not being done by ravaging the current employee's retirement as Baltimore County Executive Jim Smith is trying to do. They also have a Spending Committee evaluating the financial impact. Baltimore County did not have the pension system evaluated prior to proposing the radical changes to the current retirement system.

172 agree | 151 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement