
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Despite a slight increase in investment income and assets, the underfunded liability for the Baltimore City Employees Retirement System continued to grow in 2006, prompting questions from council members during an annual review at City Hall on Wednesday.
“When is the bleeding going to end?” Council Vice President Robert Curran asked.
Council members peppered the board with questions as officials explained that several years of poor investment performance continue to put pressure on pension finances.
“The city contribution to the fund is up significantly this year — nearly 30 percent — are we looking at a trend?” asked City Councilwoman Helen Holton, chairwoman of the Taxation and Finance Committee, which oversees city pension funds.
Kenneth Kent, an actuarial advisor for the city, said the growth in the city’s underfunded liability — $119 million in 2006, up from $63 million in 2005 — was the result of several years of investment losses, as well as an increase in the number of city employees living longer. Still, officials said, the city’s contributions will continue to rise.
“We are probably going to have to continue to contribute more money,” said Raymond Wackes, city budget director.
Payments to all city pension funds, including firefighters and police, are slated to rise 17 percent to $118 million in fiscal 2008.
The report said ERS’ net assets increased $45 million in 2006. The fund also increased payments to retirees by $2.5 million.
ERS Chairwoman Roselyn Spencer said the fund is on solid footing compared to other pension funds.
“Pension funds all over the country are struggling; in the scheme of things we are doing well,” she said.
Despite the shortfalls, Spencer said her investment strategy would remain conservative. “We’re trying to hit singles and doubles — not home runs,” she said.
sjanis@balimoreexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
8:01 AM MST on Mon., Feb. 25, 2008 re: "Howard considering trust fund for retiree benefits obligation"
Report as inappropriate
7:11 AM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007
re: "More than $10M set aside for retiree benefits"
Report as inappropriate
5:58 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 20, 2007
re: "More than $10M set aside for retiree benefits"
Report as inappropriate
Not surprised said:
Retirement should be in 401K plans. With the county and the employee contributing. Then there would be no unfunded liability!
32 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Baltimore County's website makes no mention of a 5 % penalty , nor does it tell you how they aren't finish yet... if this information is true then employees who have been loyal and hard working are to be pusished for their committment. If the Administration and Council and Govenment on all levels really are so worried about the system , then perhaps they should show how much they care about all of their constituens out here in the communities it by reaching into thier own retirement systems/pockets and pay into the Social Security System. and Retirement system and cut their pays.. Excuse me, but it would seem that we have elected people who have no problem taking pensions from workers who are the backbone of the entire system....yet..pay nothing themselves... I think that perhaps it may be time that government "for the people" replaces "by the people" with "real people."
159 agree | 150 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Howard County's approach to funding their retirement liability is not being done by ravaging the current employee's retirement as Baltimore County Executive Jim Smith is trying to do. They also have a Spending Committee evaluating the financial impact. Baltimore County did not have the pension system evaluated prior to proposing the radical changes to the current retirement system.
172 agree | 151 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree