Now, how much would you pay?
Judging by the bids in the ongoing Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Auction, an audience with Alan Greenspan and Andrea Mitchell is worth more than one with any of the other famous-for-D.C. types who are donating their time and treasure. Breakfast and tea with Al and Andrea was fetching $45,000 as of Tuesday afternoon — about 10 times more than any other lot. (Maybe the bidders are looking for some investing tips?)
The auction, conducted at CharityBuzz.com, benefits the memorial’s mission of supporting defenders of human rights throughout the world.
Here are some other D.C.-related lots, along with their current prices. The auction ends Friday.
Back to the futures market
With the 2008 presidential candidates’ first quarter campaign finance reports coming out rapid fire, we checked in on the political futures markets at InTrade.com. After all, who better to reveal the impact of the fundraising figures than the people who stand to profit from it? (For the uninitiated, InTrade’s users buy and sell futures contracts on the candidates that pay out $100 if a certain pol is nominated by their party.)
On the Democratic side, Sen. Hillary Clinton’s $26 million haul boosted her price from $49.40 to $52 over the course of Monday. Sen. Barack Obama climbed nearly a half-point, from $28.50 to $28.90, as news leaked that he’d declare about $20 million. John Edwards’ $14 million take actually dropped his stock, from $8.40 to $6.90.
For the GOP, Mitt Romney and his $23 million was the big winner. His price climbed from $14.90 to $17.30. Sen. John McCain’s disappointing $12.5 million dropped his price from $21 to $17, while Rudy Giuliani’s $15 million haul bumped him a half-point from $34.20 to $32.70.
And despite him not having a campaign yet, former Sen. Fred Thompson has moved up since the weekend, from $16.80 to $22.
Up close with Jon Voight
Actor Jon Voight, in town to film “National Treasure 2,” chatted politics with an intimate group over dinner at Teatro Goldini Wednesday night.
Voight said that one of the highlights of his visit to D.C. was a visit with Catholic scholar George Weigel, whose work served as background for Voight’s portrayal of the title character in the TV movie “Pope John Paul II.”
“In all the movies about the pope no one nailed it better than you guys,” Weigel told him.
In addition to filming, Voight also has been promoting “September Dawn,” his film about a massacre carried out by Mormons 150 years ago.
He’s emphasizing that the film isn’t an indictment of Mormonism generally, only of religious extremism and the need for all religions “to confront the sins of the past.” He called Islamic fanaticism “serious business” and referred to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad as a “real evil force.”
He added that the film shouldn’t reflect poorly on Mitt Romney. A self-described “non-partisan,” he said he hasn’t talked to the Mormon presidential candidate about the movie, but he does think that Romney is “presidential material.”
As for who he’s pulling for in 2008, Voight, showing that his time in Washington has made him ever diplomatic said, “It’s just too early.”
D.C. on the calendar of Mr. and Mrs. Smith
Actors Will Smith and Jada Pinkett Smith will be in town on May 9 to receive an award at the Lupus Foundation of America’s annual gala at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel.
Malcolm Jamal-Warner, of “The Cosby Show” fame, will emcee the event.
And we also hear that a certain dreamy pop idol with a big voice will be on hand to perform. Stay tuned.
A nickname for Ginsburg
Anyone who has seen Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg knows that, although she’s big on law, she’s short on physical stature. Some of the employees who work around her in the Supreme Court Building find her diminutive size rather endearing and have taken to calling her “Little Tweety Bird,” a moniker they use only within their small circle.
But, lest you think that Ginsburg might rule such a nickname as “out of order,” that same circle insists that it’s a kind nickname, and one meant to reflect the notion that they feel very protective of Ginsburg.



Local


SEE THE LATEST ON THIS STORY
Comments
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"When will the public finally rise up and DEMANDING an honest media that represents the views of the country?!"
She was honest. The media is not supposed to represent the views of the country. That would be "state" media. Then again, you probably would have preferred that the media had continued to support the racist segregation of blacks given that most of the country, at that time, supported it.
The media is supposed to report the news. If the news puts the United States in a poor light, then so be it. The truth is what matters. Not the viewpoint of the public.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"it took me 15 minutes on the internet using google and ebay to determin that an IBM Selectric II could produce the leaked document"
It took less time to determine the Yellowcake documents were fake considering that the were "signed" by a leader who had not been in power for quite some time. Yet, the administration went with them anyway.
If you are this confident that the rather documents are forgeries, than you should encourage an investigation, not discourage it.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
"mad moon man seems to be a little weak on the whole history and constitution thing"
If you are going to try to throw something like this out there, how about rebutting with facts? I assure you that I know the "whole history and constitution thing," how about you showing me where I am wrong? Otherwise, you simply show yourself to be one of the many simple minded fools, unable to back up your ignorant statements.
I also assume that you believe that Bruce Fein, conservative constitutional scholar is truly a liberal? I assume that, in your mind, the CATO institute is a bastion of liberal thought? You have no idea what is liberal and what is conservative. You only believe that anyone who rejects Bush's philosophy is a liberal.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate
I long for the days when we had a president with honor and integrity. One who respected the Constitution that he swore to uphold. One who went after the enemy instead of what he believed was a convenient target. One who lived up to his words and go after those nations who harbor terrorists, such as Pakistan, who provides safe haven for bin Laden. One who would acknowledge that nearly all of the hijackers who attacked us on 9/11 were Saudi, and over 50% of the foreign insurgents in Iraq are Saudi -- and actually go after the Saudi's instead of embracing them as allies and friends. George Bush is an embarrassment to this nation. He will go down in history as the most incompetent and corrupt leader our country has ever had.
The blind love an loyalty to this president is sickening. The neo-cons seem more like those who embraced the British crown while the Framers sought to bring real liberty to our nation. All it took was fear to rollback all that they worked for.
Vote on this comment: agree or disagree | Report as inappropriate