Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and former White House counsel Harriet Miers made the final decision last year to fire eight federal prosecutors, a former Justice Department chief of staff told a Senate committee Thursday.
"The decision makers in this case were the attorney general and the counsel to the president," Kyle Sampson told the Judiciary Committee in the first testimony from someone inside the administration with firsthand knowledge of the matter. "I and others made staff recommendations, but they were approved and signed off on by the principals."
Initially, Gonzales denied any involvement in the firings of the U.S. attorneys. Later, the Department of Justice provided documentation showing that, in fact, Gonzales was present at meetings where the matter was discussed and ultimately decided.
The controversy has prompted from Democrats to call for the removal of Gonzales and has tested the loyalty of Republicans who are exhausted from defending the Bush administration for its conduct of the Iraq war.
Sampson confirmed suspicions that the eight attorneys were fired for, more or less, political reasons.
"I would be the first to concede that this process was not scientific, nor was it extensively documented," he told senators. "That is the nature of presidential personnel decisions."
Such presidential appointees are judged on a wide variety of subjective criteria, including whether they are successful from a political perspective, he said.
Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., peppered Sampson with highly detailed questions based on information handed over by the DOJ.
"U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president, but justice does not serve at the pleasure of the president or any president," he said.
Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said "the list of contradictions, contortions and contractions grows longer every day."
"Maybe no one has anything to hide and everyone acted honorably, but it is sure hard to come to that conclusion based on the events of the past seven weeks," he told Sampson.
Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., one of the administration's staunchest backers, told Sampson that "there's some inconsistencies in comments that have been made."
He said, "I think the attorney general deserves a fair shake, but there will be hearings and we will get facts and, in the end, I think the truth will come out."
Sampson acknowledged mistakes on his part but said they were made in good faith.
"The decisions to seek the resignations of a handful of U.S. attorneys were properly made but poorly explained," he said.



Comments from Examiner Readers
12:19 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 29, 2007 re: "White House Tackles AG's Contradictions"
Report as inappropriate
10:34 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 28, 2007
re: "White House Tackles AG's Contradictions"
Report as inappropriate
7:11 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 28, 2007
re: "White House Tackles AG's Contradictions"
Report as inappropriate
10:14 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 28, 2007
re: "White House Tackles AG's Contradictions"
Report as inappropriate
5:57 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 28, 2007
re: "White House Tackles AG's Contradictions"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
More likely, Gonzales is betting that the entire conversation in the hospital room will never come out verbatim. Combine this with a very narrow definition of the "public" security issue as opposed to some equally narrow definition of the still "secret" security issue, and Gonzales can effect "lie" without actually telling a lie in the technical sense. Until or unless the supposed "secret" program is revealed, we will never know for sure. All that being said, he is not trustworthy in general, and he must go. I also agree with the earlier comment about personal friendship going over every other consideration.
52 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Gonzales is a liar. He knows he is a liar. Bush knows he is a liar. We all know he is a liar.
56 agree | 48 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Bob Smith said:
Good company 5:57, Gonzales is both a purgerer and a schmuck. The only difference between him and Schumer and Leahy is that those schmucks were elceted by the voters and Gonzales was knighted by King Bush. I don't think Gonzales even knows he's lying. That's the way it is with sociopaths. (look it up) As long as he is blessed by the tephlon KIng, he has nothing to worry about.
56 agree | 55 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Gonzales has allowed private friendship and political loyalty to cross the line between honesty and dishonesty. He is, in far less serious waters, making the same mistake the senior officers of the German armed forces made in World War II: my loyalty to the legal boss trumps every other consideration of honesty or justice. In this sense, Gonzales stands not so much for the rule of law as the rule of man - one man in particular, "the commander guy", Geroge W. Bush. For this reason, going to the heart of the Republic and the rule of law, Gonzales must go.
63 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Nick Jackson said:
Americans have not seen outrageous testimony such as that given by Alberto Gonzales since the 1950s when Congressional committees were subjected to the obvious evasions and perjury of underworld crime figures and labor racketeers. How can Congress tolerate the crude lying of the man who holds the job as the nation's top law enforcement officer? Even if there is a legitimate dispute between Congress and the Executive Branch about privileges and the balance of power, perjury before Congress is not one of the techniques permitted for engaging such a dispute.
69 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree