Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
After studying data from noise-monitoring stations and aircraft traffic patterns, two retired Air Force pilots confirmed that noise levels had increased on the Virginia side of the Potomac River because pilots were taking shortcuts away from the river and over homes.
Procedures to reduce noise over neighborhoods call for planes approaching and departing the airport to fly along the middle of the Potomac.
The flight path is not mandatory for safety reasons, said Paul Wieland, one of the study's authors. Pilots can divert in cases of bad weather or traffic. But the number of deviations during studied low-traffic periods suggest pilots are requesting course changes for convenience, Wieland said.
Air traffic controllers at Potomac TRACON received refresher training in flight paths that reduce noise, FAA Administrator Marion Blakey assured U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf in a letter released this week. Wolf, a Republican who represents Fairfax County, assisted a citizens' association in getting the training.
All National airport traffic controllers will receive refresher classes by April 13, Blakey wrote. Similar classes will be repeated on a quarterly basis.
Noise increased at Virginia monitoring stations in Langley Forest and at Great Falls after post-Sept. 11, 2001, safety requirements changed National airport flight paths, Wieland said. Those requirements were dismissed in 2002, and noise at Maryland monitoring stations decreased while levels at the Virginia stations grew, the study said.
mhegstad@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
8:25 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 re: "BWI struggles as international magnet"
Report as inappropriate
6:51 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 8, 2007
re: "Airport meeting disappoints"
Report as inappropriate
5:21 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 8, 2007
re: "Airport meeting disappoints"
Report as inappropriate
8:59 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 5, 2007
re: "Airport expansion plan doesn’t fly with some county residents"
Report as inappropriate
11:23 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007
re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"
Report as inappropriate
11:22 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007
re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"
Report as inappropriate
5:09 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007
re: "Nine write to county officials on airport plan"
Report as inappropriate
1:11 PM MST on Thu., May. 31, 2007
re: "New anti-expansion group demands delay of airport vote"
Report as inappropriate
12:09 PM MST on Thu., May. 31, 2007
re: "New anti-expansion group demands delay of airport vote"
Report as inappropriate
10:47 AM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007
re: "Airport’s runway plan threatens asphalt plant"
Report as inappropriate
6:41 AM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007
re: "Qatar Airways, others, offering new flights to Dulles"
Report as inappropriate
1:59 PM MST on Wed., May. 23, 2007
re: "FAA taking steps to reduce airplane noise after complaints"
Report as inappropriate
5:36 AM MST on Mon., May. 21, 2007
re: "Anti-expansion group submits petition"
Report as inappropriate
1:14 AM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007
re: "FAA taking steps to reduce airplane noise after complaints"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
The most obvious reason why Maryland cannot attract international business is that the state beurcacrats, most of who come from the hick town Baltimore, refuse to even acknowledge the Nation's Capital which is enaces by Maryland by three sides. The state may have changed the name of the only state-run airport to include Washington, but that's as far as the politicians go. In Maryland, everything is about Baltimore, despite the true economic engine of the state being Montgomery County, which is struggling to compete with Northern Virginia, a region with a huge international business center. Maryland has failed in so many ways. It's a hick state through and through.
8 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Mr. Rau makes some good points, however his references to noise and property values at the Greensboro airport are not a good comparison to the situation in Carroll County. Greensboro is an international airport with regular commercial passenger flights. That is not and will not be the case here.
182 agree | 203 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This airport issue is NOT about accepting the FACT that Westminster is growing. It actually has little to do with the growth of Westminster. Did the last expansion "boost" enormous growth for Westminster? Corporations can currently use CCRA without an expansion. Remember - its already a safe airport at its current size - this airport has a good safety record now - let's get other current issues cleaned up before even considering adding more!
209 agree | 187 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jodi Siu said:
There are also Carroll residents that want to see the expansion. I think it is a great thing! It will be safer for our many pilots in the county and quieter for those close to the airport. Growth is a good think any people should accept the fact that Westminster is growing.
318 agree | 246 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
George Grubby said:
I have no tolerence for public official or citizens who speak out against abusive spending and taxes untill they stand to be on the receiving end of such funds. Yes, most likly if we do not accept these funds they will go somewhere else, however it is that attitude which fuels the perpetual motion of ever rising taxes. I urge or commisioners to live up to their conservative principals and say no to the temptation of federal money and not to forfiet values for value.
225 agree | 228 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
lisa said:
I moved to carroll county to get away from the noise. Please leave things the way they are. the citizens of carroll county should speak not the government
199 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I also sent a letter. Why was I not mentioned as one of the nine? Is the opposition being hidden? NO AIRPORT EXPANSION. The citizens are against the Expansion. Commissioners, represent the people.
215 agree | 209 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I ran across your stories on the internet while looking for help for our town's opposition to the airport expansion. I live around the Crisfield-Somerset Cty Airport in Crisfield, MD. Our county (Somerset) had an Environmental Assessment done by URS (May 2007)- as a result of this study the county wants to take 3 homes/33 acres of trees/8 acres of wetlands. WE ARE IN AN UPROAR over this. We are a very small town with a very small airport. We do not need an increase in the amt of planes, in size of planes & noise. 80% of residents around airport are retired or close to it. We have 700 signatures on our petition, we sent copies to FAA, URS, local, state & federal politicians. As a result of this, a public hearing is planned for us to speak against this expansion. You should be afforded the same opportunity as us. Contact your commissioners. We have just taken the next step closer to winning, but who knows what are real chances are. I wish you all luck. M. Atkins
230 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Perhaps the Commissioners need a pay raise. 45K would make anyone fight the system. Lets get three new Commissioners and give them a pay raise to lead this County for the people. We voted for these and we need a new batch.
213 agree | 192 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
To set the record straight: My family has been near the airport for almost 50 years. We didn't "buy" a house near the airport. We were here before the airport. I have spoken to many others who say they were told by the county there were no plans for expansion. One woman said she even went to the planning department and checked before she bought her house. If the county wants to expand the airport, they should not have allowed (and continue to allow) so many housing developments near the airport. Where is proper "Land Use Planning"? The County's claims that "airport users" will pay for the expansion costs is nonsense. It is the taxpayers who will pay. There is no hard and fast line between the Carroll County Airport Enterprise Fund and county taxpayers' general fund. Watch the numbers. This year the new hangars show up in the "Privately Funded" column. Watch what happens next year. Mysteriously, those numbers will drift back into the "County-funded" column.
470 agree | 219 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Anti-NIMBI said:
Wow, what can I say; if not having airplanes fly over your deck while you sip your martini is important to you, maybe next time don't buy a house near an airport.
435 agree | 243 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Las Vegas resident said:
Recently the FAA has imposed a new flight path over a large amount of homes in west Las Vegas. They said there would be no compromise or restrictions. I came across this article and it tells me the FAA are hypocrites! Being the fastest growing city for the last 25 years the quality of life has gotten worse with traffic, crime, and now massive jet planes flying over my house from 6 A.M. to 1 A.M. You are lucky to get some kind of compromise with the FAA.
222 agree | 212 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The citizens of Carroll County truly need to be heard and taken seriously in this issue. This proposed expansion is not in the best interest of the county's loyal citizens. This proposed expansion has no justification to economically sound. This proposed expansion has no benefit for the county's own citizens who strive to make Carroll County a great place to live! Keep Carroll County Beautiful!
238 agree | 216 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
residents being ignored said:
If i came to your house and did loops around it on my dirt bike you would call the police and i would be in trouble for noise and property damage.what police do we call for your noise and property damage? i cant stand the noise or turbulance in the past 3 years,nothing has been done about it,the cracks in my ceilings and walls are getting bigger,it wakes me up in the middle of the night.we can not open our windows here.not to mention the health and saftey issues..no one has paid for any sound proofing yet.before this plan is even thinkable you should take care of the damage that is already caused to tinicum.BEFORE IT GOES ANY FURTHER.
244 agree | 222 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree