Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
In February, Supervisor Jake McGoldrick introduced legislation that would enact a six-month trial that would close a 1.5-mile stretch of John F. Kennedy Drive and some connecting roads. On April 9, the legislation will come before the Board of Supervisors Land Use and Economic Development Committee.
McGoldrick introduced similar legislation last year, which was approved 7-4 by the Board of Supervisors but was vetoed by Mayor Gavin Newsom.
In his veto letter, Newsom expressed concern about the lack of “an objective analysis” of the impacts of the road closure, since there were concerns it would result in adverse traffic impacts, diminish attendance at the museums and limit park access to those with disabilities.
In February, an independent study commissioned by the Mayor’s Office revealed that traffic and parking impacts were minimal and more visitors came to the park and the local cultural institutions on the day of the existing Sunday closures.
Closure opponents say that an accurate study of the impacts can’t be made until after the Academy of Sciences reopens in late 2008.
In the last several weeks, however, the mayor said he has been meeting with both sides.
“We’re hopeful we can find some balance,” he said.
Closure supporters and opponents are also afraid to go back to the voters, a source close to the current talks said.
“It seems relatively apparent that neither side wants to go back into a mean nasty showdown. There’s enough fear of one or the other winning,” the source said.
In 2000, the battle over closing the park roads went to the ballot box with two competing measures: one supported by 18,000 signatures asking for an immediate trial closure and another asking that the roads remain open on at least one weekend day until a new 800-car underground garage could be built. With votes for the closure split between the measures, both lost.
San Francisco financier Warren Hellman, who backed the measure to delay the trial closure, said now that the garage is open, the Saturday closure should be given a trial run.
“What Newsom needs to do is what Willie Brown did a bunch of times — put both sides in a room and say we’re not leaving this room until we settle it,” Hellman said. “This thing is never going to go away, it has to be compromised.”
With the threat of a lawsuit by disability advocates looming, city officials are also working fast and furious to implement access improvements promised last year in the area near John F. Kennedy Drive that is already closed to cars on Sundays.
The disability improvements that were promised included new accessible parking spaces, signage and drop-off zones, as well as a new, free accessible shuttle ensuring disabled access on JFK Drive.
Timothy Hornbecker of The Arc of San Francisco, an advocacy group for people with disabilities, said Mayor Gavin Newsom’s office has promised to provide him with a letter today that outlines when the disability measures would be implemented.
On Feb. 28, Hornbecker sent the mayor and the Board of Supervisors a letter threatening a class-action lawsuit that would ask for the Sunday closure to be stopped until accessibility measures were put in place.
The disability barriers were brought to light last year, after Supervisor Jake McGoldrick introduced legislation in support of also closing the roads on Saturdays. McGoldrick included the access improvements within the legislation, which was approved 7-4 by the Board of Supervisors and vetoed by Newsom.
Each day until voters go to the polls Nov. 6, The Examiner lays odds on local figures beating Mayor Gavin Newsom. Check out our exclusive blog: San Francisco's Next Mayor?



Comments from Examiner Readers
12:24 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 30, 2007 re: "‘Healthy Saturdays’ may gain longer life"
Report as inappropriate
10:52 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 30, 2007
re: "‘Healthy Saturdays’ may gain longer life"
Report as inappropriate
10:17 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 30, 2007
re: "‘Healthy Saturdays’ may gain longer life"
Report as inappropriate
7:57 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 30, 2007
re: "‘Healthy Saturdays’ may gain longer life"
Report as inappropriate
6:05 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 30, 2007
re: "‘Healthy Saturdays’ may gain longer life"
Report as inappropriate
James, San Francisco said:
We can keep the Healthy Saturday closure and manage accessibility needs for the disabled or others. Also, the hikers, walkers, bicyclists, etc., are also the ones who are paying for the roads and the park, not just the drivers. We must start thinking and planning for a different way of life, folks - sitting in the cars and driving everywhere is bad for our own bodies and is a pollution source that we can diminish. Just because there are changes like these, does not mean that we can allow any anxiety related to those changes to preclude our own problem-solving creativity, to figure out how to have a healthier society and environment.
91 agree | 80 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It seem like the politicians in this city don't care for senior citizens and the handicapped who may want to use the park.
105 agree | 102 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Well lets see - the folks that pay for the roads can't use them. Interesting when they start instituting a bicycle tax that pays for improvements and upkeep of those roads only then should you be able to close any road to vehicles. There are plenty of places for hikers, walkers, skaters (like riders do whatever they want wherever) and bikers.
113 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
James, San Francisco said:
Let us have the courage to make this a permanent closure. After all, there must be places where hikers, walkers, skaters, bicyclists, etc., can go to enjoy a more leisurely pace of recreation.
102 agree | 98 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I like the idea of upgrading Middle Drive for bikers and skaters. I think this should be a permanent closure. However, please, PLEASE keep JFK drive open on Saturdays. It is the only east-west road in the park that absolutely needs to be kept open to all traffic. Closure is no longer necessary since the roads were reconfigured to handle additional bikes everyday. They major park attractions need to be made available to the highest number of people possible. McGoldrick and the SF Bike Coalition are elitists who want the park only for themselves.
109 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree