Cardin explains subpoena vote
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Although U.S. Sen. Ben Cardin voted to authorize subpoenas for White House and Department of Justice officials involved in the firing of eight U.S. attorneys, he hopes the Senate doesn’t have to issue them.

“I hope that the White House will recognize the importance of this matter and cooperate,” the Maryland Democrat said Thursday after casting his vote as a member of the committee.

The White House has agreed to provide only limited access to the officials.

“I don’t think any investigator would want to have a meeting in which you can’t even have a transcript of the meeting and it’s not open to the public,” Cardin said.

Cardin said the firings are “affecting the morale” of the U.S. attorneys’ offices and “the confidence of the American people that we have an independent U.S. attorney in their state.”

According to Cardin, six of the eight U.S. attorneys “were involved in sensitive political investigations.”

“It was clear the White House was not happy by the manner in which these political investigations were being handled,” he said.

dfowler@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

10:12 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007 re: "Senate war bill features $20B in pork"

Examiner Reader said:
i am one of a million on the web calling for voter revolt on this one. this is a front-page story until it is denounced thoroughly and killed. the Congress had challenged the ordinary voters with this outrage they hoped to go unnoticed here at Christmas Eve. not this time. Enough is enough! shall be call on all contacts to name names and show how the incumbants hope to save their "seats."

200 agree | 174 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:54 PM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "Senate war bill features $20B in pork"

Examiner Reader said:
It takes a bunch of down right idiots to hang all this garbage on an emergency bill. "Bring in the Clowns" never mind they are all in congress

481 agree | 509 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 1.00 seconds)