Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
“These predators are the vilest members of our society and their vile actions deserve severe punishments,” said Sen. Nancy Jacobs, lead sponsor of the bill (SB 413), which has more than half of the Senate as co-sponsors.
Last year, the General Assembly increased the penalties on those convicted of sex crimes. This included a mandatory minimum sentence of 25 years for an adult who commits a first-degree sexual offense against a child under 13, and a five-year minimum for a second-degree offense against a child. But the law left open parole for those offenders.
“There is a very high rate of recidivism” among sex offenders, Jacobs said. That’s why she and other supporters want to eliminate the possibility of parole.
The measure is referred to as Jessica’s Law after a Florida statute enacted in 2005 after the abduction, molestation and murder of 9-year-old Jessica Lunsford by a known sex offender who lived near her.
Jacobs said this bill “may only help with five or ten” convicted offenders per year. But Sen. Jim Brochin, D-Baltimore County, who added himself as co-sponsor, said, “I wouldn’t want to take a chance.”
Sen. Lisa Gladden, D-Baltimore City, the vice chair of the committee who is a public defender, said, “Prosecutors are loathe to impose mandatory sentences.”
“We need useful laws,” and mandatory minimums are not useful, Gladden said.
Another opponent of the proposal, Sen. Jamie Raskin, D-Montgomery, said, “I was very moved by the testimony I saw, but very little of it had to do” with what the legislation tries to do.
The hearing on the bill March 14 angered many of the supporters because it occurred at 6 p.m. after a majority of the committee members had left, including Chairman Brian Frosh, D-Montgomery. Frosh said he listened to the hearing on tape.
“Nobody likes to go last,” said Frosh, who opposed the measure.
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Joseph Vallario, D-Prince George’s, also opposed the bill last year, and Jessica’s Law’s advocates from around the country are trying to put pressure on him.
Half the Judiciary Committee co-sponsored Jessica’s Law, said member Chris Shank, the House minority whip.
“The votes are there to pass it,” he said.
Paroling Sex Offenders
The Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services said that 28 sex offenders in Maryland were paroled in the past three years. Most of them were released after serving half to two-thirds of their sentence. Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services Legislative Director Rhea Harris said the department does not have an accurate count of sex offenders since many were convicted of different crimes than the sexual crimes for which they were charged. There are more than 25,000 inmates in state prisons. – Len Lazarick
llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
7:59 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 30, 2008 re: "New laws take effect today"
Report as inappropriate
2:04 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008
re: "Mendelson troubled by ex-offender bill"
Report as inappropriate
2:02 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008
re: "Mendelson troubled by ex-offender bill"
Report as inappropriate
1:58 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008
re: "Mendelson troubled by ex-offender bill"
Report as inappropriate
1:56 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008
re: "Mendelson troubled by ex-offender bill"
Report as inappropriate
1:54 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008
re: "Gov. O’Malley to veto drug parole bill"
Report as inappropriate
1:50 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008
re: "Gov. O’Malley to veto drug parole bill"
Report as inappropriate
1:43 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008
re: "Mendelson troubled by ex-offender bill"
Report as inappropriate
7:15 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 13, 2008
re: "Group disputes smoking ban effect"
Report as inappropriate
11:52 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 15, 2007
re: "Bill expands residential restriction near schools"
Report as inappropriate
8:13 AM MST on Wed., Aug. 29, 2007
re: "Mendelson troubled by ex-offender bill"
Report as inappropriate
7:12 AM MST on Thu., May. 31, 2007
re: "Gov. O’Malley to veto drug parole bill"
Report as inappropriate
Bobbie Viszolay said:
Hey Folks!!!! Jesus Christ is coming back Give your life to him and you will be saved (live forever) Do NOT except the mark a chip in bedded in the head or hand with info. ALSO...If you dont believe me read revelations and john 3:16 do it if you are interested in knowing the one and only GOD HIMSELF JESUS CHRIST THE LIVING SON OF GOD. he will accept ANYONE thats right ANYONE who comes to him. Say JESUS SAVE ME. He will in NOWAY turn any soal away. THere is a fate if you dont. I am not crazy its for real!!!!!!
5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Many and Etcetera cover tons if not all jobs and job descriptions. The writer of the article states that these Questions are being asked and used as a job qualifications from the lowest positions in the neighborhood supermarket all the way to the highest positions corporate America. This is The Mark of Cain. Is it not true that in today’s society? That there has been misconduct, corruption, sexual abuse, tax fraud, theft, and murder all committed by people who have held jobs in the field mentioned by (always) before these people were arrested were they considered Non-criminals, and are they still Americans and are Ex-Convicts still Americans. Sincerely. RHJR.
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
public background checks are flawed and in some cases they should be treated as criminal because there are thousands of people with the same name and mix-ups are an often occurrence ( always states: In previous times, a criminal was permanently ostracized from society. In our current, more humane times, we house, feed, clothe, allow conjugal visits to, educate, and rehabilitate criminals.) This seems to refer to individuals that are presently incarcerated the issue here is the Ex-Convicts search for employment and now that the Ex-Convict has been educated and rehabilitated what should he or she do to support themselves and their families. Is it not ostracizing for a Job Interviewer or Job Application to ask Ex-Convicts or anyone for that matter: Have you ever been arrested, or have you ever been convicted of a crime. (always states: For many jobs, YES, it makes a huge difference whether one is a convicted criminal or not--being a teacher, law enforcement officer, tax accountant, etc.)
5 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
. These questions on a job application should not be there, they are self-incriminating, they are inhibiting, they are unforgiving, and they are extremely severe punishment for people who have paid their debts to society this is The Mark of Cain and again does the Punishment fit the Crime? and, are Ex-Convicts still Americans? Sincerely. RHJR
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
, employment to support their families and themselves when the Job Interviewer or the Job Application asks the Ex-Convict if he or she has ever been arrested or convicted of a crime: these Questions can cause a good person to become a liar out of fear of not securing a job thus inhibiting them to provide for their families and these Questions are being asked and are appearing on applications for the supposed reasons of a background check from the lowest positions in the neighborhood supermarkets all the way to the highest positions in corporate America. This can not be fair because an interviewer or the reader of a job application is first human and we as humans can not un-hear something or un-see something if an Ex-Convict answers Yes to these questions then he or she will most likely not get the job, whether they’re qualified or not, and if an Ex-Convict answers No then he or she will be fired when the background check comes back showing the dishonest answer. These questions on
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I do not approve of criminal behavior, the issue here is does the punishment fit the crime. Whether the charge is a violation, misdemeanor or felony in the state of New York and most other states as well these arrest are never removed from your history and also these arrest become public record and anyone that might want to view them can, I think this is extremely severe punishment especially after the persons time has been served. There are Ex-Convicts of all degrees and many of them are and have been truly rehabilitated some have totally re-invented themselves, some have spent lots of time and money, they have completed school courses and gained Degrees and Educational success, they have gained the respect of family and peers and much more. However (they cringe when they are forced to relive the errors of there past, a past that they have repented for many times over and over and now feel that they have become good members of our American society) when they seek honest hard work, em
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
7/2/2008 The Mark of Cain / Ex-Convicts and their Search for employment Dear, Fox 5 News Team. I know that criminals and crime are a big problem in the USA and all over the world for that matter I also know that there have been terrible crimes committed by horrible people. Fox 5 News Team, in the news last month (June, 2008) the Supreme Court did not approve the Death penalty for convicted Child Predators / Molesters stating that the punishment did not fit the crime if that is the case then, why does the Ex- Convict with far less crimes against them, after all of his or her time has been served, all penalties paid, all that is asked of them by the courts and society are done, why must they go through the rest of their lives with The Mark of Cain (X) upon them, I use this phrase because it is Biblical as is the phrase In God We Trust which as we all know is used in our courts, on our money, and in numerous other aspect and respects of our daily American lives ,again I do not
5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Big Brother's Watching / But Who's Helping? On the plights of the Ex-Convict and please keep in mind that even if the Ex-Convict does re-offend that there are more extensive repercussions and consequences as there are the three strikes laws for felonies and more time and or payment for repeat offenders of any degree so there for there is no justification to pre-judge the Ex-Convict or to inflict what seems like the perpetual sentence of the British Law ( Guilty Until Proven Innocent ).Background checks and questions that separate a particular class of people on Job Applications are un-fair and can be self- incriminating and definitely discriminatory,after all this is America the greatest country in the world and Americans do have rights, again are Ex-Convicts still Americans? Sincerly. RHJR.
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I persoanly do not care if they all close because i do not frequent bars and never did becaue of all the dam smoke.
190 agree | 193 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's about time!!! These people should be locked up, and the key thrown away. They are not going to change. Once a sex offender, always a sex offender. I think these people should be released to the families of the kids they victimized!!! Now that's justice!!!
536 agree | 258 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Just because someone did something in the past doesn't mean they will do it again....and just because someone else has "no prior record" doesn't mean they won't commit a crime!
275 agree | 266 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am a concerned citizen, with a family member that has been in jail for over 81/2 yrs. all for a drug charge ,there has been worse convicted felons and released on major crimes .I think this program would be a chance to give certain individuals who are tyring to change there life the oppertunity to do so .
358 agree | 357 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree