Multimedia News

Sexiest older women. How old are they?
20 photos
Actress Kate Walsh poses for pictures after l...
Beautiful people in Cannes
20 photos
Australian actress Diana Glenn poses for phot...
Celebs out and about
18 photos
Actress Lindsay Lohan arrives at the Diesel x...
NFL Sunday
20 photos
New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre passes ...
The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...

Jewish women exploring options

Mar 22, 2007 12:00 AM (571 days ago) by Kelsey Volkmann, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE
BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Rabbis should convene and post-nuptial agreements explore in the wake of a failed bill designed to free women from Jewish marriages, a victim advocate said.

“We can pursue rabbis convening to think of some remedies to alleviate the concerns of these women, and we can explore other options, like post-nuptial agreements,” said Nancy Aiken, director of Counseling, Helpline and Aid Network for Abused Women, an agency of The Associated, the Jewish Community Federation of Baltimore. “But these don’t solve the moral and ethical problems.”

The Senate rejected a bill Friday that would have required Orthodox Jewish men to grant their wives religious divorces when seeking civil divorces after lawmakers expressed concerns about the state intruding on religion.

Only men can grant a “get,” or Orthodox Jewish divorce, and women who are not given gets are forbidden from remarrying within the religion.

This story continues below
Advertisement

A post-nuptial agreement could be attained through a rabbinic tribunal, said Nat Lewin, an attorney who drafted similar legislation, which passed in New York 20 years ago.

Cynthia Ohana, a Baltimore City resident whose struggle to receive a get from Ephraim Ohana launched city protests, said she was “horrified” that some female and Jewish senators voted against the bill.

“Imagine the statement it makes to abusers,” said Ohana, who testified in favor of the legislation. “How do I possibly explain this to my children? What a slap in the face! I hold every person who voted against the bill personally responsible for the current hostage situation of Jewish women in Maryland.

“Domestic abuse is intolerable, but its enabler is absolutely unforgivable,” she said of the lawmakers who didn’t vote for the measure.

But Sen. Jamie Raskin, D-Montgomery, an American University constitutional law professor, said the proposal allowed the state to intrude into religion.

A House version of the bill sponsored by Del. Sandy Rosenberg, D-Baltimore City, has not been scheduled for a hearing.

kvolkmann@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

11:33 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008 re: "National Baptist Convention will boost Baltimore economy"

Examiner Reader said:
If the national Baptist Congress of Christian Leaders can sink an estimated $40,000,000 into the Baltimore economy couldn't they invest that money into building their own educational complex to house that and other conventions and keep the money in the black community and leave a legacy to future generations?

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

7:40 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 29, 2007 re: "Anglicans allege ‘intimidation’ in attempt to name defendants"

robroy said:
It is sad that the love of Christ as what binds the church together has been replaced by the threat of lawsuits. As Paul said, "The very fact that you have lawsuits among you means you have been completely defeated already. Why not rather be wronged? Why not rather be cheated?" Win or lose, the Episcopal church is COMPLETELY DEFEATED.

203 agree | 204 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement