
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Not since Nicolas Copernicus declared the Earth orbits the sun has a theory about the planet spawned so much controversy.
Now comes amateur scientist and former Vice President Al Gore who has put global warming at the center of American political debate” to testify on Capitol Hill about this topic that already so deeply divides people, even scientists.
Other than the Iraq war, no issue this year has dominated Congress more as Democrats assert their newfound authority to pass legislation to curb the heating of the globe.
If his documentary “An Inconvenient Truth” is any indication, Gore will tell lawmakers that in 10 years, “a point will have been passed and there will be an irreversible slide into destruction.”
And, “Our ability to live is what is at stake.”
It will be the first public questioning of Gore by one of the loudest and most unflinching global warming skeptics, Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., who chaired the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee until Republicans lost control last year. He has openly speculated that fears of manmade catastrophic global warming may be the greatest hoax ever perpetuated on the American people.
Inhofe especially delights in skewering scientists, and the reporters who cover them, as modern-day Chicken Littles. He recently made available to the public his “Skeptic’s Guide to Debunking Global Warming,” a 65-page booklet of speeches, articles and scientific data that question the theory of global warming.
But nothing delights Inhofe so much as when the weather refuses to cooperate and snowstorms cancel a hearing on global warming or a frostbite injury ends the arctic trek of scientists studying global warming.
Gore will get no more of a sympathetic ear in his appearance before the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, where he will be grilled by Chairman John Dingell, D-Mich.
Dingell, the “dean” of House Democrats who represents Michigan’s auto industry, does not share the fears of Democratic leaders who consider global warming a “threat to national security.” He opposes raising fuel–efficiency standards because that pinches automakers and the workers they employ.
The conflict is such that Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., earlier this year removed climate change matters from the jurisdiction of Dingell’s committee and created an entirely new committee.
The Select Committee on Energy Independence and Global Warming, Pelosi has promised, will come up with legislation by July 4.
“We should probably name it the committee on world travel and junkets,” Dingell told The Associated Press after Pelosi announced the creation of the new panel. “We’re just empowering a bunch of enthusiastic amateurs to go around and make speeches and make commitments that will be very difficult to honor.”
churt@dcexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
4:06 PM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007 re: "Congress loads up $20 billion in pork"
Report as inappropriate
5:49 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 30, 2007
re: "Congress sidesteps dire warnings on Social Security and Medicare"
Report as inappropriate
3:03 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 30, 2007
re: "Congress sidesteps dire warnings on Social Security and Medicare"
Report as inappropriate
wayne hutchings said:
the dems throw out their chests, decry the war, get the pork and prove they are the same as the neocons
289 agree | 292 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Fixing Social Secuirty is a breeze--and no reductions in benefits or increase in retirement age is necessary. You make it a true defined benefit pension system by changing PayGo to actuarial advance funding using an actuarial cost method called Entry Age Normal. This will allow you to invest a substantial part of the assets in stocks or stock like investments once the short term cash outflows are taken care of by Treasuries. The excess of stock returns long term over Treasury bills is huge--around 6-7% per year. Compunded annually it makes all the difference. I estimate that we already have enough money in Treasuries--around 2 trillion dollars and this is around 4 times one year's cah payout--more than enough. In fact, the SS actuaries forecasts show we do not need any more money until about 2041, or around 34 years from now. For example, just put an additional $50 billion a year into the system and invest it all in a low-cost broad based stock index fund, and that will fix it!
294 agree | 334 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's a shame and a disgrace how our people in Wash. D.C. seem to avert the Social Security and Medicare issues. Then again, why should they be concerned they will not have to rely on either of the two issues and I am sure they will syphon off funds for "more pressing" concerns. The Seniors don't seem to count and are more of a liability than they used to be,
289 agree | 265 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree