Meet the new administration, senators and members of congress and how they plan to affect change.

Los Angeles Examiners

Kevin Allen
Los Angeles Political Satire Examiner
Most Recent Post
Obama vs. Hitler: The debate rages on...
Hunter Stiebel
Los Angeles Political Examiner
Most Recent Post
A California Election Day Prop. Cheat Sheet
 
 

Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

Senate votes to allow airport workers to unionize

Mar 7, 2007 12:00 AM (636 days ago) by Charles Hurt, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The Senate turned back an effort Tuesday to remove from the anti-terrorism bill provisions that would grant collective bargaining rights to 43,000 airport luggage and passenger screeners.

The 51-46 vote, largely along party lines, virtually guarantees that the bill to implement recommendations by the 9/11 Commission ultimately will be vetoed by President Bush.

Bush and Republicans in Congress say that giving the Transportation Security Officers collective bargaining rights will bog down anti-terrorism efforts at airports nationwide.

John Gage, president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said it is a basic work right.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“It is only through collective bargaining that management comes under a legal obligation to listen to employee concerns and work through issues collaboratively,” he told a Senate committee Monday.

The agency, according to Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii, has experienced a high rate of turnover and low morale.

“Without collective bargaining, employees have no voice in their working conditions,” he said.

Screeners want to negotiate, according to Gage, “the scheduling of overtime, shift rotation; the availability of flextime arrangements or compressed work schedules; the agency’s provision of appropriate health and safety equipment; options concerning the inevitable deployments away from regular work stations; parking; child care and public transportation subsidies.”

That’s exactly what worries Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., who said that the success of the Transportation Security Administration depends upon its agility in implementing new procedures at a moment’s notice.

He and other Republicans point to last year’s banning of liquids and gels on airplanes, which took less than two hours to execute after top officials decided on the new regulations.

“It was the most significant change in airport security since 9/11,” said George Voinovich, R-Ohio. “And it all happened in less than six hours from the time of the arrests of the alleged terrorists in the UK.”

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said the screeners deserve fair treatment, good wages and an appeals process.

“But is that right greater than the right of the American people to have secure and safe air travel?” he asked. “I put forth to this body that it’s not.”

Bush has vowed to veto the bill if it contains collective bargaining rights.

And Rep. John Mica, a Florida Republican who is the ranking member of the House transportation committee, wrote Senate leaders yesterday, saying he had “secured a commitment from more than 146” members of the House to uphold a veto from Bush.

churt@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

9:25 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 20, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

i don know said:
hey can u tell me why we are still in iraq?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

7:12 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 13, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Examiner Reader said:
the was just need to stop so our troops can come home in be with there family

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:46 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 4, 2008 re: "Cornyn, Noriega await results"

Rock said:
Cornyn appeals to the rural voters in Texas and it is starting to look like the urbanites have had enough extremism. Add 1/2 million displaced Louisiana Democrats in with the big cosmopolitan centers like Houston, Austin, Dallas and San Antonio and we may see a long predicted change in the balance of power. It is too early to call any races but it looks like a bumpy night may be in store for Lone Star State.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:20 PM MST on Sun., Oct. 12, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Heather said:
wow these people really don't know what's going on do they? That really amazes me it really does. how could they not see what was happening all around them? this is the 5th time?!! Wow that's all I can say right now wow...

7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:03 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 7, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Examiner Reader said:
I think that the war shouldnt be going on because of that it has cost the economy to go bad

6 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:37 PM MST on Thu., Oct. 2, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Examiner Reader said:
45862973852165

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:15 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 2, 2008 re: "Senate war bill features $20B in pork"

Examiner Reader said:
Bring all of the porkers out into the daylight. We need transparency and exposure for this type of crookedness.

5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:29 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 1, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Sarah Lawson said:
this is a very dumb reason to be fighting!!!! jus get over it people! thank you for trying. sincerly. your reader.

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:06 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 28, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Examiner Reader said:
wow u suck

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:12 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007 re: "Senate war bill features $20B in pork"

Examiner Reader said:
i am one of a million on the web calling for voter revolt on this one. this is a front-page story until it is denounced thoroughly and killed. the Congress had challenged the ordinary voters with this outrage they hoped to go unnoticed here at Christmas Eve. not this time. Enough is enough! shall be call on all contacts to name names and show how the incumbants hope to save their "seats."

209 agree | 183 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:54 PM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "Senate war bill features $20B in pork"

Examiner Reader said:
It takes a bunch of down right idiots to hang all this garbage on an emergency bill. "Bring in the Clowns" never mind they are all in congress

491 agree | 519 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement