You are here: Los Angeles Politics

California News

McComas’ legislation targets chaining

CommentsComment on this article
Mar 7, 2007 12:00 AM (547 days ago) by Len Lazarick, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: Annapolis

Annapolis (Map, News) - Everybody likes a good dog story — but the dog stories that dozens of witnesses told the House Judiciary Committee last week were tales of horror, not happiness.

A series of veterinarians, animal rescuers and humane society workers were there to testify on a bill by Del. Susan McComas, R-Harford County, that would prohibit chaining an unattended dog from midnight until 6 a.m. and during severe storms and excessively hot or frigid weather. The measure also seeks to discourage choke-type collars.

“Tethering a dog or any animal is cruel,” McComas told the committee on which she serves. “Animals cannot speak, so I’m here to stand up for their rights. When dogs are tethered for long periods of time they can become very aggressive, and may be dangerous to passersby and even to their owners. They are more likely to bite.”

“An otherwise friendly and happy dog when continually restrained and isolated often becomes neurotic, unhappy, anxious and aggressive,” said Frank Branchini of the Humane Society of Baltimore County, who testified for a number of Baltimore-area organizations in favor of the bill.

This story continues below
Advertisement

He cited a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that chained dogs are 2.8 times more likely to bite and 5.4 times more likely to bite children than unchained dogs are. According to Branchini, 112 children in the United States were killed or seriously injured by chained dogs in the last three years.

“The chain doesn’t really address the issue of a dangerous dog,” Branchini said.

Veterinarians testified the chained dogs often suffer permanent injuries from poorly fitted collars or chains as they pull or strain against them.

Sen. Norman Stone, D-Baltimore County, has sponsored a similar bill, which has passed the Senate in a previous session, McComas said. Montgomery County already has legislation prohibiting tethering a dog from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., as well as having other features of the McComas bill.

No one at the hearing spoke in opposition to the bill, but similar bills have had trouble getting out of the Judiciary Committee in the past.

llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

12:59 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008 re: "Dog days ease the workplace"

 Examiner Reader said:
The work place is for work, not play time with your dog. I like dogs, don't get me wrong, but most dogs are not trained well enough to be in a work environment. Why recently, have we allowed dogs to hold equal status with humans? i.e. restaurant!!?? A big no no in my book, grocery stores? department stores.. c'mon, it's a dog! Not everyone shares a love of your dog. Leave it at home, it's going to be more comfortable there anyway. We don't want to hear FiFi bark and whine, share its slobber and drool and whatever else. Let me, the human being, choose when I want to be exposed to an animal.

 4 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:58 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008 re: "Dog days ease the workplace"

 Examiner Reader said:
Lets hope the last two posters don't have children to pass on the vile hatred they have for animals.

 3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:25 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Dog days ease the workplace"

 Examiner Reader said:
What is it with so many people today? Can we please stop anthropomorphizing our animals and just let them be our pets? Can we cease with the cute, expensive outfits? the pet hotels? and taking them out to dinner with us? What's up with vet bills in the tens or thousands of dollars? Considering the amount of "need" in the world around us, I believe this situation has become arguably ludicrous.

 2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:31 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Dog days ease the workplace"

 Leave Your Pets at Home!!! said:
Really tired of the fetishization of pets as surrogate children for so many mentally unbalanced people (i.e. Leona Helmsley leaving $12,000,000 to her friggin' dog and zilch to her kids). The amount of money people lavish on their animals while fellow human beings starve to death the world over sickens me. And regardless of whatever minimal benefits stupid exercises like the one above may provide for their ownders, please leave your dogs at home. I don't want some flea-ridden, slobbering beast trying to climb up on my lap while I'm trying to work. Like one's human offspring, the beauty of a pet is almost invariably in the eye of the beholder.

 5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:38 PM MST on Fri., May. 16, 2008 re: "Residents oppose District bill to ban pit bulls"

 Leeza said:
i have been raised around pitbulls ever since i was little. My dad has 2, my uncle has 1, and i have 1. They are the nicest dogs, protective yes, but not vicious!! i love them. they are a amazing dogs, and i could not imagine putting them to sleep. they are a part of the family! I could not imagine my life with out them!!! I dissagree with trying to ban the ownership of them. any animal deserves to be loved and cared for. not abused. it is the owner, not the dog. raise your dog right, and they will be good!

 4 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:16 PM MST on Sat., Feb. 23, 2008 re: "Bill could make euthanasia less painful for animals"

 Examiner Reader said:
I work in an animal shelter and xylazine does NOT offer a humane way of putting animals to sleep. Many cats go into seizures and a co-worker was bit recently as he tried to euthanize a dog that was not completely put under. Ketamine is essential if the state of MD wants to give its animals a humane death. "The moral progress of a nation can be determined by the way in which it treats its animals." -Ghandi

 78 agree | 60 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:30 PM MST on Sat., Feb. 23, 2008 re: "Bill could make euthanasia less painful for animals"

 Examiner Reader said:
I have apit bull and she is the BEST dog I have ever owned. The media loves to demonize this breed. The facts are Pit Bulls are one of the most stable people-friendly dogs in existence. The National Canine Temperament Testing Association tested 122 breeds, and Pit Bulls placed the 4th highest with a 95% passing rate! The abusive owners need to be punished not this wonderful breed

 63 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:35 AM MST on Tue., Dec. 18, 2007 re: "Pit bull attacks prompt officials to launch study"

 Examiner Reader said:
I am the owner of a staffie and she is one of the most intelligent, loving dogs that I have ever had. She is great with kids and loves their attention. We recently had to find a new rental house and had a horrible time because of the breed of dog that we have. It is very sad that people are still so ignorant when it comes to this breed. I have an English Pointer that is a rescue dog that I worry about more with kids than my staffie. He was abused and can show signs of aggression when he feels threatened. As responible owners we keep both dogs on leashes at all times and the two dogs are not left alone together. Ban bad owners, not good dogs.

 92 agree | 92 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:09 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 28, 2007 re: "Anne Arundel has no plans to ban pit bulls"

 Examiner Reader said:
The story above says, "Of the 798 bites reported in 2005, 75 were pit bull bites. The majority of the bites were from mixed breeds." Why not ban the other 723 breeds too? People have an inordinate fear of these dogs. Furthermore, pitbulls are a distinct breed and are sometimes incorrectly blamed for attacks by other breeds.

 163 agree | 136 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:28 PM MST on Wed., Nov. 21, 2007 re: "Pit bull attacks prompt officials to launch study"

 Examiner Reader said:
I myself have a pitbull and a doberman. im only 20 and i bought both these dogs with no prior experience with either breed. it's just like anything else, owners should research about the breeds. Give them a good environment to be in. Treat them with respect and show them love and they will do the same for you. People only tend to hear about the bad side of these breeds due to BAD OWNERS! Yes i understand they can be aggresive towards other animals, but what dog doesn't want to show it's dominance? Whats all this talk about kids being killed? It's called parental supervision. Another example of bad owners and bad PARENTS. You only hear about what the dog did. What about the person? It's just ignorant to try and ban such a magnificant breed. I love my dogs cuz i know they have back. If i were ever to be in trouble they would be there for me. All in all an owner and the surrounding neighbors need COMMON SENSE!

 181 agree | 155 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:55 AM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Pit bull attacks prompt officials to launch study"

 Examiner Reader said:
I have a pit bull breeder whom moved in beside me! The dogs have attacked my dogs serveral times through the fence. All neighbors are worried about these dogs. We all have small kids. We are all also very close to each other. But, because we are in the country (county) we cannot do anything!! I along with everyone else am tired of being imprisoned in my own neighborhood! I love dogs!! But these dogs should be kept out of neighborhoods such as ours. I don't care if there is one, but to breed them right next door isn't right! I have seen them pack with one another when they attack. One of these dogs got out and killed another neighbors dog and nothing was done. I have also seen the dogs bite their own owner and owners child. Animal control said that they had to be contained to their own yard. In which they are in a cow pen type of fence that they stick their heads through. I wish that there were something the other neighbors and I could do. We all feel stuck& we were all here first!

 200 agree | 153 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:11 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 24, 2007 re: "Residents oppose District bill to ban pit bulls"

 Examiner Reader said:
I'm so upset that everyone has to pay the price for the dog fighters, breeders of pits and bad owners.I'm really upset that these people of higher up can take our dogs, but can't stop dog fighting,ect.What is next!

 284 agree | 225 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:43 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 20, 2007 re: "Pit bull attacks prompt officials to launch study"

 Examiner Reader said:
wow, your friend was kindof an idiot for leaving a pitbull alone with another dog. pitbulls don't usully get along w/ other dogs, thats like Pitbull 101, and if you chose to own a pitbull and didnt know that, than whatever happns is your own fault becuase your the owner and shuld know better. the dog is just doin what its been bred to do for hundreds of years. your friend has no one to blame but herself.

 211 agree | 163 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:37 PM MST on Thu., Sep. 20, 2007 re: "Pit bull attacks prompt officials to launch study"

 Examiner Reader said:
That's a heck of an attitude for a Baltimore resident to have. Most reported violent crimes have some African-Americans involvement, so by your "logic" we should probably enact some sort of bill saying where they can and cannot live, and with significantly harsher penalties for them if they step out of line. I think we can all agree that sort of mindset is completely wrong - don't try to tell me it's okay just because it's directed at a dog breed instead of a person. Racial profiling is wrong across the board.

 217 agree | 168 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:54 PM MST on Sat., Sep. 8, 2007 re: "Residents oppose District bill to ban pit bulls"

 Examiner Reader said:
this person is right, breed bans make no sense. In places where pits are banned, there hasnt been a signifigant drop in bite incidents. Its a fact,look it up. Banning one breed makes nomore sense than banning one type of gun. Its the people not handlng potentialy dangerous things properly that are to blame, not the potentialy dangerous things themselfs. Also, all dogs bite. I read a study by an impartial org. that tested dog breeds temperments and found that of soemthing like 50 most populer breeds, pitbulls are the 4th least likely to bite. golden retrevers were,like, 5th most likely, but no ones screaming about banning them and most ppl wouldn't worry about leaving their kids alone with a golden retrever.

 512 agree | 232 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:37 PM MST on Sat., Sep. 8, 2007 re: "Pit bull attacks prompt officials to launch study"

 Examiner Reader said:
9:37 AM - I love dogs too, and I also own a nice dog. Guess what? He's a pit. Know why there're so many stories of pit attacks? Because people panic and report them more than they report any other breed. A lab bites you, well, he was just playing rough. A pit bites you, omg he was trying to murder you. Pits need good owners who are willing to take the time to understand the breed - they have a strong prey drive, meaning they're quick to go after things they perceive as 'prey' - like children or smaller dogs. Many breeds have this same trait, but they're not as plentiful as pits. The main problem is with the rampant, unregulated breeding. It's a cheap, tough dog, which is why it's so popular with bad owners. Look at the history of breed perception in this country. They used to want to outlaw Rotties, and before that Dobermans, and before that German Shepherds. Outlaw pits and bad owners will just find another breed to exploit. Breed bans solve NOTHING.

 219 agree | 168 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:37 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 8, 2007 re: "Pit bull attacks prompt officials to launch study"

 Examiner Reader said:
I agree strongly with Councilman Gardenia and I hope the bill he proposes goes through. I am so tired of hearing about pit bull attacks on children and other harmless pets. I know first hand that individuals who claim that it is how the pit bull is raised determies how they behave is untrue. My friend was one of those individuals until she came home one day from work to find that her adult female ppit bull had mulled and killed her own puppy. How this tragedy of attacks by these dogs have been allowed to continue is a disgrace to our society. Babies killed by family pit bulls only to be defended by so called dog lover is horriffic. I love dogs and own a nice dog. But we must protect our children, pets and neighborhoods from vicious animals and irresponsible owners. I pray this bill passes. A Baltimore County resident.

 224 agree | 192 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:09 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "Group seeks stiff sentence for dog's killing"

 Examiner Reader said:
I would like to know if your canned prescription dog food has undergone the same testing that your other products have? I lost two dogs last week and the only common denominator that can be determined is your dog food.

 288 agree | 248 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:14 AM MST on Sat., May. 19, 2007 re: "Group seeks stiff sentence for dog's killing"

 Examiner Reader said:
it is wrong to kill an animal dogs are good it is the people who are bad i seen a person run over a dog tonight 05/19/07 and they tried to do it and i just sat there in my car hurt because i knew the dog was hurt and dieing and i could not do anything to help the poor creature it was so sad i live in hammond louisiana i call call law enforcement and gave them the license plate number i hope they catch them it not right to kill dogs in any kind of way

 291 agree | 285 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:46 AM MST on Tue., May. 15, 2007 re: "Groomer charged in death of poodle"

 Bill Dikant said:
I'll bet that this person will get more jail/prison time than a DRUNK DRIVER who kills someone!!!. E.O.M.

 333 agree | 341 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:32 AM MST on Tue., May. 15, 2007 re: "Pit bull attacks prompt officials to launch study"

 The 'new' capitalism said:
To Sarah Ellis: What you 'think' has no bearing on scientific fact. Pitbulls become dangerous because they are the traditional breed used for illegal dog fighting. Their behaviors come solely from poor treatment, malnourishment, and abuse, not from their breed. I own a pit bull and she is more friendly, playful, and loving than any dog I have ever owned. Ignorant statement like yours, based in fear and not in fact, are detremental to the real probelm with dog attacks, animal cruelty....

 334 agree | 340 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:29 PM MST on Fri., May. 4, 2007 re: "Pit bull attacks prompt officials to launch study"

 Sarah Ellis said:
I disagree with Vigilance and McIntire regarding the Pit bull breed. All one has to do is look at the statistics on dog attacks to see that the breed is very aggressive, even deadly. I think these dogs should not live in neighborhoods, but be contained in larger areas, such as farms. The attack that happened on Burke was in an area of row houses, where lots of children abide. Pit bulls should not live in these type of areas.

 290 agree | 327 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:45 AM MST on Fri., May. 4, 2007 re: "D.C. high on animal compassion"

 Mary said:
Hopefully soon all the fur stores will close and Ringling Brother Circus won't come here anymore, and then we'll be at the top of the list!

 308 agree | 314 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:52 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 7, 2007 re: "Hills Science Diet takes recall hit"

 Examiner Reader said:
"Prescription Diet" is available at pet stores but you can only buy it with a prescription from your vet. So if you're buying the regular Science Diet dry food that you can buy without a prescription, you should be OK. You might want to check tje FDA's Web site for the latest list of brand that have been affected, though, and maybe check with your vet too.

 1,381 agree | 321 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:48 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 7, 2007 re: "Hills Science Diet takes recall hit"

 Examiner Reader said:
What does 'PRECRIPTION DIET ' mean ? What's the difference between plain "Hills Science Diet " dry cat food ?

 302 agree | 354 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement
 
Site Map   
Family Movies and Books
from Walden Media
Venues, Sports and Music
from AEG Worldwide
Concerts, Artists and Tickets
from AEG Live
Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories
The Foundation for a Better Life
© 2008 Copyright Examiner.com.
All Rights Reserved