Meet the new administration, senators and members of congress and how they plan to affect change.

Los Angeles Examiners

Kevin Allen
Los Angeles Political Satire Examiner
Most Recent Post
Obama vs. Hitler: The debate rages on...
Hunter Stiebel
Los Angeles Political Examiner
Most Recent Post
A California Election Day Prop. Cheat Sheet
 
 

Multimedia News

World AIDS Day: Observing a global epidemic
20 photos
Children from the Andile School choir sing du...
This weekend in sports
20 photos
Venezuela's boxer Jorge Linares, left, exchan...
Holiday gift ideas: Toys, games and more
20 photos
A child holds a newly released mobile phone c...
Black Friday frenzy
20 photos
Early bird shoppers run into a Target store i...
Mumbai massacre
20 photos
A police officer watches the Taj Hotel, Mumba...

GOP: Unions would hinder airport screening

Feb 28, 2007 12:00 AM (643 days ago) by Charles Hurt, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - This week’s effort by the Senate to grant collective bargaining rights to the country’s 34,000 airport baggage and passenger screeners will cause longer security lines and compromise anti-terrorism efforts, Republicans said Tuesday.

“It would be detrimental to the safety and security of the American people,” Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, told reporters.

He and other Senate Republicans had just finished lunch with Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, who warned that such a move would undermine the department’s efforts to screen passengers and their luggage in a thorough and efficient manner.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, the Connecticut independent who heads the Senate’s Homeland Security Committee, said that the Transportation Security Administration has avoided “enforcing the most basic employee protections.”

This story continues below
Advertisement

As a result, TSA has seen “unusually high rates of attrition, vacancy, workplace injury, discrimination complaints and other indications of employee dissatisfaction,” said Lieberman, whose committee approved the unionization measure earlier this month.

The TSA estimates that the changes would cost the department $160 million to hire labor–relations specialists and negotiators, employ union stewards, and train employees and managers about the bargaining process. That’s equivalent to 3,500 security officers or 300,000 security screenings per day.

Republicans accused Democrats of pushing through the measure as a favor to unions, which overwhelmingly support Democrats. “The TSA ought to be a first line of defense in the war on terrorism, not a vehicle for political payback,” one Senate Republican said.

Majority Leader Harry Reid dismissed the accusation.

“All I can say is I believe we are [supporting] the views, goals and aspiration of the working men and women of this country,” he said.

Republican staffers told The Examiner Tuesday that the White House will issue a veto threat as early as today if the Senate approves the unionization measure.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., reminded reporters Tuesday of the last time a Democrat insisted on giving collective bargaining rights to TSA screeners, back when Congress created the Homeland Security Department in 2002.

Later that year, Democrats lost seats in the November elections, at least in part because of their insistence that the officers be given collective bargaining rights. Among those to lose in 2002 was then-Sen. Max Cleland of Georgia, who was defeated by Sen. Saxby Chambliss.

Chambliss accused Cleland of opposing anti-terrorism efforts because he refused to vote for the creation of the new department unless it included the union provisions.

“It was about national security then, and it’s about national security now,” Chambliss said Tuesday.

churt@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

9:25 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 20, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

i don know said:
hey can u tell me why we are still in iraq?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

7:12 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 13, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Examiner Reader said:
the was just need to stop so our troops can come home in be with there family

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:46 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 4, 2008 re: "Cornyn, Noriega await results"

Rock said:
Cornyn appeals to the rural voters in Texas and it is starting to look like the urbanites have had enough extremism. Add 1/2 million displaced Louisiana Democrats in with the big cosmopolitan centers like Houston, Austin, Dallas and San Antonio and we may see a long predicted change in the balance of power. It is too early to call any races but it looks like a bumpy night may be in store for Lone Star State.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:20 PM MST on Sun., Oct. 12, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Heather said:
wow these people really don't know what's going on do they? That really amazes me it really does. how could they not see what was happening all around them? this is the 5th time?!! Wow that's all I can say right now wow...

7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:03 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 7, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Examiner Reader said:
I think that the war shouldnt be going on because of that it has cost the economy to go bad

6 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:37 PM MST on Thu., Oct. 2, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Examiner Reader said:
45862973852165

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:15 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 2, 2008 re: "Senate war bill features $20B in pork"

Examiner Reader said:
Bring all of the porkers out into the daylight. We need transparency and exposure for this type of crookedness.

5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:29 PM MST on Wed., Oct. 1, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Sarah Lawson said:
this is a very dumb reason to be fighting!!!! jus get over it people! thank you for trying. sincerly. your reader.

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:06 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 28, 2008 re: "U.S. intel warned of Iraq violence, says Senate committee"

Examiner Reader said:
wow u suck

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:12 AM MST on Wed., Dec. 19, 2007 re: "Senate war bill features $20B in pork"

Examiner Reader said:
i am one of a million on the web calling for voter revolt on this one. this is a front-page story until it is denounced thoroughly and killed. the Congress had challenged the ordinary voters with this outrage they hoped to go unnoticed here at Christmas Eve. not this time. Enough is enough! shall be call on all contacts to name names and show how the incumbants hope to save their "seats."

209 agree | 183 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:54 PM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "Senate war bill features $20B in pork"

Examiner Reader said:
It takes a bunch of down right idiots to hang all this garbage on an emergency bill. "Bring in the Clowns" never mind they are all in congress

491 agree | 519 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement