Democrats plans to revoke war authorization
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Democrats in search of an Iraq exit strategy will float another proposal this week in hopes of appeasing their anti-war base while avoiding the catastrophe many warn will result from a hasty retreat.

In the Senate, Democrats are drafting legislation to revoke Congress’ 2002 vote authorizing the war. That effort is headed by Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin of Michigan and Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Joe Biden of Delaware.

Levin always has opposed the war, but Biden was among the 29 Democrats who in 2002 voted to go to war.

Another proposal, supported by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, would pull troops out by March of next year and restrict U.S. troops to fighting al-Qaida terrorists, training Iraqi forces and maintaining Iraq’s border.

Over in the House, Rep. John Murtha wants to begin choking off money for the war by heavily restricting the funding for it. The Pennsylvania Democrat chairs the powerful Defense Appropriations subcommittee that controls military spending.

The new proposals come after Democrats failed to get final approval of a nonbinding resolution to condemn President Bush’s plan to send 21,500 reinforcement troops to Iraq. That resolution, which was viewed as treasonous by the right and too weak by the left, passed the House but could not overcome a Republican-led filibuster in the Senate.

‘’This is not a surge so much as it is a plunge into Baghdad and into the middle of a civil war,’’ Levin said Sunday of the Bush troop plan.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said all the various proposals indicate that Democrats are in search of a “Goldilocks” resolution.

They want something “that is hot enough to appease the radical left wing but cool enough for party leaders to claim they support the troops,” he said.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice dismissed the Democratic tactics as “the worst of micromanagement of military affairs.”

Withdrawing from Iraq before a stable government takes control, she and other Republicans argue, would guarantee complete failure in the Middle East.

churt@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

4:06 PM MST on Sat., May. 26, 2007 re: "Congress loads up $20 billion in pork"

wayne hutchings said:
the dems throw out their chests, decry the war, get the pork and prove they are the same as the neocons

289 agree | 292 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:49 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 30, 2007 re: "Congress sidesteps dire warnings on Social Security and Medicare"

Examiner Reader said:
Fixing Social Secuirty is a breeze--and no reductions in benefits or increase in retirement age is necessary. You make it a true defined benefit pension system by changing PayGo to actuarial advance funding using an actuarial cost method called Entry Age Normal. This will allow you to invest a substantial part of the assets in stocks or stock like investments once the short term cash outflows are taken care of by Treasuries. The excess of stock returns long term over Treasury bills is huge--around 6-7% per year. Compunded annually it makes all the difference. I estimate that we already have enough money in Treasuries--around 2 trillion dollars and this is around 4 times one year's cah payout--more than enough. In fact, the SS actuaries forecasts show we do not need any more money until about 2041, or around 34 years from now. For example, just put an additional $50 billion a year into the system and invest it all in a low-cost broad based stock index fund, and that will fix it!

294 agree | 334 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:03 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 30, 2007 re: "Congress sidesteps dire warnings on Social Security and Medicare"

Examiner Reader said:
It's a shame and a disgrace how our people in Wash. D.C. seem to avert the Social Security and Medicare issues. Then again, why should they be concerned they will not have to rely on either of the two issues and I am sure they will syphon off funds for "more pressing" concerns. The Seniors don't seem to count and are more of a liability than they used to be,

289 agree | 265 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)