
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History
# 4,484 of 6,831
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - San Francisco’s library building improvement program is behind schedule and over budget, but The City’s head librarian said he believes most of the work promised to voters can be completed.
Predominantly funded by a $106 million improvement bond approved by San Francisco voters in 2000, the ambitious $141 million program was originally scheduled to have 19 branch renovations and four full construction projects completed by 2009.
Due to escalating construction costs, some projects may be delayed, City Librarian Luis Herrera said.
“All projects are still a go, but I think until we identify some additional sources of funding, they could be rescheduled,” Herrera said. “It’s been more expensive than we anticipated.”
Herrera said his experts have estimated that the entire project could end up being up to $50 million over budget.
“I’m trying to be up front,” he said. “It could range from $34 million to $50 million.”
Herrera spoke to The Examiner on Friday, the day before the grand reopening of the newly refurbished West Portal Branch, the second renovation project to be completed under the improvement program.
In addition to seismic improvements, the branch library also has a new elevator for people with disabilities — as well as moms with big strollers — new bathrooms, staff work areas, floors, paint, landscaping and a new teen area. New Hewlett-Packard computers sit atop library tables from the 1930s that have been refurbished.
Four other branches — Marina, Noe Valley, Sunset and Western Addition — are closed for similar renovation projects. However, others that were scheduled to begin construction last year remain in waiting, and several branch projects have been taken off the timetable — Bayview, North Beach and Ortega.
Herrera said he didn’t want to name specific branch projects that might be put on hold until more funding is secured, since he plans to present his recommendations to the Library Commission on Thursday.
He did suggest that if a project was put off, it might eventually come back as a new construction project, instead of a renovation.
“We might be looking at a new library … Ortega, for example, comes to mind, rather than a renovation,” Herrera said.
Already, more than $5.1 million has been taken out of the library system’s general fund to cover unexpected overages associated with the branch library improvement program. Herrera said the transfer wouldn’t affect library hours or staffing, since the funds have come from a reserve built up by a Library Preservation Fund, approved by voters in 1994.
That budget baseline provision is scheduled to go back to the voters in 2009, and Herrera said he hopes that having most of the improvements completed by that time will boost the goodwill of those going to the ballot box.
“When they see the renovations … the tangible results of the bond measure, I think they’ll want to really support the [library’s] operations and stable funding for it,” Herrera said.
# 4,484 of 6,831 |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
2:28 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 18, 2007 re: "Huge shortfall for library renovations in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
12:26 PM MST on Tue., Sep. 18, 2007
re: "Huge shortfall for library renovations in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
11:38 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 18, 2007
re: "Huge shortfall for library renovations in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
11:23 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 18, 2007
re: "Huge shortfall for library renovations in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
10:15 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 18, 2007
re: "Huge shortfall for library renovations in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
6:45 AM MST on Tue., Sep. 18, 2007
re: "Huge shortfall for library renovations in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
5:09 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "S.F. libraries may dip into preservation fund"
Report as inappropriate
4:21 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "S.F. libraries may dip into preservation fund"
Report as inappropriate
3:50 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "S.F. libraries may dip into preservation fund"
Report as inappropriate
2:37 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 18, 2007
re: "S.F. libraries may dip into preservation fund"
Report as inappropriate
Native San Franciscan said:
I support funding for our libraries. Most people do. That’s not the issue. The issue is our tax dollars being spent wisely and in a cost effective manner. The City and County of San Francisco is one of the most inefficient and wasteful spending machines I’ve ever seen. The budget for the City and County of San Francisco is $6 billion dollars, a budget bigger then that of 20 states. But does the Muni run on time? Are the streets clean? Are the parks well maintained? How can San Francisco spend so much money and its public infrastructure look so bad? That’s the question we should be asking City Hall.
153 agree | 159 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yes Moscone Park comes to mind. The library (white contractor) was 8 months behind schedule. The rec center is 4-5 months ahead of schedule (minority contractor). Not trying to troll. Just the facts. The library contractors would disappear for days. The rec center they contractor is there 12hrs every day mon-sat.
153 agree | 159 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is just the tip of the political iceberg. If they are twenty months late on each project that adds up to decades of delay, and with $50 million overbudget, it is safe to conclude that they never intended to be on schedule and on budget. This is just another circuit in the merry-go-round of "more money" to pay for the broken promises of last time. The truth is that the library has become a cesspool private philanthropists and construction contractors who have been draining millions from the city and by now have shown open contempt for accountability or the public benefit. This is another example of Mayor Newsom's cronyism coming to the surface. It is time to make the public library, public again.
149 agree | 127 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gretchen said:
A bond for $106 million was approved to fund a set number of projects. Now it seems that another $50 million is needed. That's nearly a 50% increase in the planned cost! That just isn't acceptable. Yes, we should probably fund it because libraries are an integral part of any society, but we need some accounting oversight on these projects so that they don't go 50% over budget! There needs to be a project plan with each task identified with an associated cost. When the money is spent, stop. If $100,000 is budgeted for community meetings, then don't spend any more than that! Budgeting means you may not be able to include expensive trims, or fancy fixtures. It also means that you may not be able to work overtime and pay overtime rates. What we need to to is approve additional financing. What we should do is say "Halt", you've spent your money and some projects won't get finished. Who has been monitoring this project and protecting the taxpayers? How could this happen?
152 agree | 157 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
San Francisco's libraries serve so many needs. They provide services for kids, families, seniors, and immigrants that go far beyond providing books. Our libraries make our city great and deserve our continued support.
145 agree | 141 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No wonder Barry Bonds had so much success here and the Giants never one. This city is addicted to bonds and it will end up the same way the Giants did. Paying alot of money and getting nothing for it!!! Evcept the politicans of course!!
152 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
San Francisco continues be be the "City that knows how." It is gratifying to know that the city leaders understand how important our libraries are in each neighborhood. I have visited Mission Bay and the renovated branches. The renovations are spectacular and I am thankful that these projects were completed with such thoughtfulness to original architectual detail. Library officials are to be congratulated for their thorough and splendid work!
218 agree | 214 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It is encouraging to see city and community resources being spent on something that benefits so many people of all ages and income levels in so many areas of the city ...and that will do so for decades to come.
210 agree | 190 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am proud of San Franciscans for supporting our neighborhood libraries. Committing to rebuilding our branch library system reflects our values. The Mission Bay Library is helping to build a new community. The Excelsior, Sunset, and West Portal Libraries are now seismically safe, well equipped, and providing great library services to people of all ages and interests. Let's applaud this program to renovate our branch library system. Great libraries build strong communities.
198 agree | 199 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Our public libraries are the hearts of the city's neighborhoods - community centers, recreational facilities, schools - all rolled into one. EWhere else can you check out new DVDs, use computers, learn English or search for an apartment, all for free? The libraries deserve our support because they, in turn, support the community.
216 agree | 193 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree