Labor tide could be turning under O’Malley, college president says
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley spent Thursday afternoon with AFL-CIO President John Sweeney and labor leaders to dedicate the new Lane Kirkland Center at the National Labor College in Silver Spring. Sweeney is chairman of the board of trustees at NLC. –
(Greg Whitesell/Examiner)
Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley spent Thursday afternoon with AFL-CIO President John Sweeney and labor leaders to dedicate the new Lane Kirkland Center at the National Labor College in Silver Spring. Sweeney is chairman of the board of trustees at NLC. –

SILVER SPRING, Md. (Map, News) - National Labor College President Susan Schurman praised Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley as a friend of organized labor, and said he would create a union-friendly environment after years of hostility.

“I think the workers of Maryland will find that the new governor is a great friend” of organized labor, Schurman said. “He appreciates not just the job that unions do in terms of collective bargaining, but in training.”

The governor, along with numerous labor leaders, was on hand Thursday for the National Labor College’s new Lane Kirkland Center dedication in Silver Spring.

The center’s dedication is part of a campuswide refurbishment project, which began in 2003. The refurbishment is part of the college’s push to improve education for union leaders to keep labor organizations relevant in an increasingly global economy.

“The way in which the economy works is changing,” Schurman said. “Most of that is the result of the public policies of free trade as opposed to fair trade. That really has resulted in the outsourcing of manufacturing work. At the same time, the public policy, at least in the last six years, has been aggressively anti-union in terms of allowing workers who want to form a union to do so.”

The power of unions, which was once unrivaled both politically and economically in the U.S. has decreased dramatically in the past two decades. The outsourcing of manufacturing jobs, especially in the auto and steel industries, significantly decreased this power. Globalization has further diluted it.

Schurman said the global environment has changed the makeup on unions. Now, its private sector workers that are in need of union representation to ensure their jobs are not eliminated or shipped overseas. She said the college works to educate union members on this new reality.

“What workers find out if that unions and collective bargaining are important, no matter what kind of industry you’re in, if you want to get a fair shake.” Schurman said. “Union leaders have to do the best job they can to make that case. I think it’s absolutely false to think that unions are not essential to a middle-class standard of living in today’s economy.”

dfrancis@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

2:13 PM MST on Thu., May. 10, 2007 re: "County workers union rejects pension changes"

Examiner Reader said:
I am not sure where Ms. Malarkey is getting her information from, There is no "Law requiring governments to prefund retirement benefits." There is however GASB which is an accounting standard that has governments accounting for and paying for other post employment benefits, ie. health care, so they will be able to maintain their AAA bond ratings. Within GASB there is no mention of pensions. I sure do wish that reporters would verify their facts prior to printing such information. It should also be noted that this article depicts the union memebers in a positive light, which is good, but recent artcles about the BCFPE appeared to show the union as the "BAD GUYS". Thank you Ms. Malarkey for your true and honest information. Not.

225 agree | 210 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:24 AM MST on Wed., May. 9, 2007 re: "County workers union rejects pension changes"

Examiner Reader said:
finaly, a union that has sence to protect their members rather than line the pockets of a few. Thank You ASCME How many of the members of the other Unions voted to ratify because they were strong armed . Every employee out there should be writing to their Councilman right now and letting them know how this retirement proposal affects their family .and demand that the portion affecting prior and existing employees be removed..not approved, whether you voted to ratify or not.

216 agree | 237 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 4, 2007 re: "Union rejects health care offer"

Examiner Reader said:
I am a little confused by Johnny Olzewski's comment --- The future action hings on the FPE vote? There are 6 unions in Baltimore County, why does the future of all employees depend on this one vote? The contract was ratified by a vote of 152 to 146! Since the majority of the members (corrections and 911) were given a two step upgrade, those numbers say a lot. 146 people were willing to give up the upgrades to protect their benefits. And what about the other 1300 employees represented by this union, many who are on the low end of the pay scale and can not afford to join for the right to vote. These changes affect them also. Remember councilman, you are in an elected position. These are not just employees, they are tax payers!

234 agree | 218 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)