
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Several city officials are grumbling about how much money San Francisco’s public schools are getting out of The City’s general fund as a result of a voter-approved schools-funding measure and want the school board to look for more ways to take city services instead of cash.
The spending debate is about Proposition H funds — passed in 2004 with the promise of providing San Francisco’s public schools with educational extras, such as sports, libraries, arts and music.
Supervisor Sean Elsbernd introduced a resolution Tuesday asking the school district to take a second look at its 2007-08 school year spending plan to find ways that city services, or “in-kind services,” could be offered instead of cash. The resolution was co-sponsored by Board of Supervisors President Aaron Peskin and Supervisor Ed Jew.
Elsbernd said $10 million of the $30 million the school district is slated to receive from The City’s general fund next year could be in-kind. Examples of in-kind services are city nurses working in school clinics, police officers who are assigned to campuses and city-supported after-school programs on school sites.
The school district has proposed $250,000 worth of in-kind services, which Elsbernd said was a start, but just “a drop in the bucket.”
Elsbernd accused the district of ignoring repeated requests from the Board of Supervisors during the last three years to increase the amount of in-kind support as The City struggles with ongoing budget deficits.
“We are just not here as an ATM where you [the school district] can take money from us and walk away,” Elsbernd said.
School board President Mark Sanchez said on Monday that he would support taking more in-kind funding in the future, but said he did not think it was fair for the supervisors to ask, at this point, for the school board to reconsider the spending plan. The plan was approved last week.
“We’re trying to the best of our capacity to use these funds appropriately,” Sanchez said. “I hope the Board of Supervisors understands that we’re also in financial straits.”
City officials are also investigating whether existing support provided to the schools could be credited against the amount owed to the district, according to City Controller Ed Harrington. For example, The City already provides funding for school health centers.
School officials and members of the district’s community advisory committee on Prop. H have bristled at such suggestions, arguing that voters expect the schools to get extra support through actual dollars.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
5:12 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 7, 2007 re: "Tide may turn on S.F. bayside building"
Report as inappropriate
9:54 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007
re: "Tide may turn on S.F. bayside building"
Report as inappropriate
9:53 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007
re: "Tide may turn on S.F. bayside building"
Report as inappropriate
9:32 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007
re: "Tide may turn on S.F. bayside building"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
How come the Brannan Street Wharf was not mentioned by the Port as a totally funded project in your article? The Port has 37 million dollars in their account to build the 65,000 sq foot park at the foot of Brannan St. and the Embarcadero. I would not trust the Port to fulfill any promises made to the Public until the Brannan St. Wharf is completed. The Brannan St. Wharf was part of the deal to allow the development of the 220 foot Watermark tower in South Beach. The tower has been complete for two years and we still have no public waterfront park. How soon the public forgets about the promises made. The Port made a fortune on the Watermark tower. Where is the PARK????
154 agree | 126 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let the homeless do the jobs no one wants to do you pick lettuce and you get a a place to live and eat, no work no handouts. How did the people of Frisco become so numb to the stench of the city?
147 agree | 146 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Absolutely you should allow this, San Fran has a great waterfront. I have just returned from a three day business trip and would have gladly stayed at a waterfront hotel. I say this because San Fran is not the worst city to walk in, it is the homeless capital of the country and the one with the largest stench of urine of any city Mayor Newsome you should be in jail for ruing such a great place
141 agree | 151 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Peskin is right. If you want to change something that makes sense, just pick away at it, one project at a time.
138 agree | 136 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree