SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Movie nights will be premiering for the first time in Golden Gate Park this summer, but the plan to charge admission for the outdoor screenings is getting mixed reviews.

Los Angeles-based Summer Entertainment Inc. was recently awarded a lease by the Recreation and Park Commission to host the movie nights in the park’s Peacock Grove during an eight-week period in the late summer and early fall. The lease allows the company to not only sell concessions but also charge admission for up to 48 movies from late August to early October.

The commission charged Summer Entertainment $33,600 for the lease — which includes vending permits — and a percentage of gross vending revenue will go back to the Recreation and Park Department, spokeswoman Rose Marie Dennis said.

The movies will be shown six nights a week.

Movie screenings in local parks are not a new concept — the San Francisco Neighborhood Theatre Foundation began showing free films in Dolores Park, Washington Square Park and Union Square in 2003 as a way to brings films to neighborhoods without movie theaters.

But in the first-ever program of its kind, the Golden Gate Park movie screenings will cost $8 to $10 per admission, Summer Entertainment General Manager Alicia Darvall said. That is causing some to wonder where movie lovers will spend their cinema dollars.

Balboa Theatre owner Gary Meyer, whose establishment is close to Golden Gate Park, is concerned that the movie nights will take business away from his theater.

Alfonso Felder, Neighborhood Theater Foundation president, said he supports the plan because Summer Entertainment has been cooperative in trying to minimize conflict, especially when it comes to movie titles.

“I think the program is such that we are hopeful it won’t be directly competitive,” Felder said.

Comments from Examiner Readers

7:06 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "In-line skating event concerns roll forth"

Examiner Reader said:
Mr Miles (the founder of the California Outdoor Rollerskating Association) has been into his own self agrandisment for many years, all in the claim of what **HE** does for inline skating. Now his true colors show. A significant event that is not under his control is planned and he is saying how evil it is. If he was running it, there would be press releases (like his usual) extoling the virture of HIS work.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:47 PM MST on Sun., Apr. 6, 2008 re: "Planting meters may save jobs"

Examiner Reader said:
No meters in the park! Can't we preserve at least one place in SF where time doesn't equal money, where we don't have to watch the clock and can just relax for a while?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

12:19 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 5, 2008 re: "Planting meters may save jobs"

On the Q.T. said:
Regarding Meters in Golden Gate Park: It's predicted that the meters in G.G. Park will generate $250,000. What would be easier? Digging all those holes and nickel and diming families, or cutting $250,000 in the City's wasteful overtime spending?

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

8:17 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 23, 2008 re: "Car-free Saturdays near"

Examiner Reader said:
Those involved also agreed not to debate the issue again for five years, according to Andrew Thornley, program manager with the bicycle coalition. Andy, I assume you have now stopped smoking, or at least while you are enjoy Healthy Saturdays in the park right? Oh wait, smoking is already not allowed in the park...you will have to use a patch if you plan to enjoy your Saturdays riding in GG park.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

12:47 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 21, 2008 re: "Car-free Saturdays near"

Examiner Reader said:
This city is heading in the wrong direction when a small vocal group of people can dictate their needs over others. I live near the park and every Sunday I deal with the lack of parking in my neighborhood because of the park closure on Sunday. But that was okay because it only happened on one day of the weekend. It seemed fair. Those wanting to drive into the park with their children, picnic supplies, etc could do so on Saturday. Well I guess that's gone. Thanks for being greedy and assuming your way is the "right" way. And we should all bend to it. Just think about it. Why is one way (closing both days) fair?

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

4:14 AM MST on Wed., Mar. 12, 2008 re: "Alleged embezzlement may cost ex-CFO house"

Examiner Reader said:
is that ALL he may lose??

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

6:51 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008 re: "Music fest to rock Polo Fields"

Examiner Reader said:
I also live across the street from the park, 10 minutes on foot from Speedway Meadow,and I also am hearing for the first time about the concert. Depending on wind direction, persistent noise from events is disturbing, definitely NOT "inaudible." Worse, though, the neighborhood traffic and bad behavior is terrible: exactly as the previous poster describes. If people behave so badly in the day, what are they going to be like at night?!? And parking is a serious issue. If the concerts don't end until 10pm, residents can't even go out for the day to avoid them, because there will be no place to park when we come back. I enjoy events in the park, but the bigger they get, the worse they get.

5 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

11:38 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008 re: "Music fest to rock Polo Fields"

Examiner Reader said:
I live across the street from the park in the vicinity of the Polo Fields and this is the first I've heard of any concert. I certainly was not part of any "outreach" if there was any. When these events take place the people who live nearby are subjected to noise, trash and property destruction. People scream and yell coming and going, throw crap on the street and trample lawns and flowers; after one of these events a newly planted (and expensive) tree was vandalized beyond saving. You can't go anywhere in your car because you will have no place to park upon your return. They will say they contacted neighborhood organizations and got their blessing but the majority of residents on both sides of the park do not belong to them. Is the PAR getting something out of this because the residents of the neighborhood certainly are not.

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate