Multimedia News

Sexiest older women. How old are they?
20 photos
Actress Kate Walsh poses for pictures after l...
Beautiful people in Cannes
20 photos
Australian actress Diana Glenn poses for phot...
Celebs out and about
18 photos
Actress Lindsay Lohan arrives at the Diesel x...
NFL Sunday
20 photos
New York Jets quarterback Brett Favre passes ...
The best of college football
20 photos
Miami's Graig Cooper scores a touchdown as Ce...

Prop. H funds vex school board

Jan 25, 2007 3:00 AM (627 days ago) by Bonnie Eslinger, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
Superintendent Gwen Chan

Superintendent Gwen Chan
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - A nearly three-hour ideological stalemate Tuesday night between interim Superintendent Gwen Chan and the Board of Education over how to use $650,000 — for more violence-prevention programs or for more school computers and classroom coaches — revealed that improving schools is not as simple as having access to more money.

The spending debate was over Proposition H funds, approved by voters in March 2004 to provide public schools with educational extras out of The City’s general fund. On Tuesday, the board voted on a spending plan for the 2007-08 school year.

Under the funding ordinance, half of the district’s annual Prop. H allocation — which next year will be $20 million — is earmarked for sports, arts, libraries and music, with the other half left up to the district’s discretion for general uses.

As the meeting dragged past 10 p.m., Chan, with frustration in her voice, said her recommendations for the $10 million in discretionary funds were spurred by the weight of her experience and the input of principals.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“I’m not scolding anybody, I just talk like this when I’m tired,” Chan said. “Can’t we just compromise?”

Last week, Chan told the school board she disagreed with a $1.6 million proposal to give each public high school and middle school $50,000 to use for “violence prevention” activities that would be determined by each school.

Chan instead asked that $750,000 of the funding go to support 10 additional math and reading coaches, and that nearly $1 million be invested in new computers. In addition, she asked that $600,000 be allocated to pay for a districtwide computer system that would be used to track student achievement data. Chan also disagreed with the committee’s proposal to more than double the amount of funding for translation services within the district by allocating an additional $600,000 for the department.

After a majority of school board members expressed support for the violence-prevention and translation funding, Chan came back to this week’s meeting with a counteroffer, suggesting that $600,000 be shaved from the violence prevention proposal to help fund the academic needs and that $400,000 more be provided for translation needs.

For nearly three hours, the board debated the merits of social programs and translation services against academic initiatives and listened to competing ideas from members of the public, school administrators and faculty, students and members of the community advisory committee that had already spent numerous months laboring over the recommendations.

In the end, board members approved a final compromise, suggested by Board of Education President Mark Sanchez, to shave $335,000 from several areas within the proposal in order to redirect the money to academic purposes.

“It’s so exciting that we’re arguing about money that we never had,” said newly elected school board member Hydra Mendoza, the education adviser for Mayor Gavin Newsom.

beslinger@examiner.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

5:12 PM MST on Tue., Aug. 7, 2007 re: "Tide may turn on S.F. bayside building"

Examiner Reader said:
How come the Brannan Street Wharf was not mentioned by the Port as a totally funded project in your article? The Port has 37 million dollars in their account to build the 65,000 sq foot park at the foot of Brannan St. and the Embarcadero. I would not trust the Port to fulfill any promises made to the Public until the Brannan St. Wharf is completed. The Brannan St. Wharf was part of the deal to allow the development of the 220 foot Watermark tower in South Beach. The tower has been complete for two years and we still have no public waterfront park. How soon the public forgets about the promises made. The Port made a fortune on the Watermark tower. Where is the PARK????

156 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

9:54 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007 re: "Tide may turn on S.F. bayside building"

Examiner Reader said:
Let the homeless do the jobs no one wants to do you pick lettuce and you get a a place to live and eat, no work no handouts. How did the people of Frisco become so numb to the stench of the city?

148 agree | 147 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:53 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007 re: "Tide may turn on S.F. bayside building"

Examiner Reader said:
Absolutely you should allow this, San Fran has a great waterfront. I have just returned from a three day business trip and would have gladly stayed at a waterfront hotel. I say this because San Fran is not the worst city to walk in, it is the homeless capital of the country and the one with the largest stench of urine of any city Mayor Newsome you should be in jail for ruing such a great place

142 agree | 152 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:32 AM MST on Mon., Aug. 6, 2007 re: "Tide may turn on S.F. bayside building"

Examiner Reader said:
Peskin is right. If you want to change something that makes sense, just pick away at it, one project at a time.

139 agree | 137 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement