State ready to replace voter registration system
Article History
There are updates to this article.

Richmond (Map, News) - A three-decades-old voter registration system will meet its end this month, as state voting officials prepare to bring online a new apparatus they say will speed information transfer and reduce the possibility of fraud.

The $12 million replacement, both mandated and funded by the federal government, would allow for quick communication and data-gathering from other state agencies, like the Department of Motor Vehicles and the Virginia State Police, according to Jean Jensen, secretary of the State Board of Elections.

Hence, they’ll know more easily when a person is ineligible to vote because he’s a felon, or when someone is using the ID of a dead person, for example.

“On the new system, it’ll be done as close to real time as you can get,” Jensen said. “So there will be immediate matches if the person who’s applied is not qualified to register to vote.”

Following the most recent midterm elections, the state elections board has a small window of opportunity to switch before the polls open again. The old system will be mostly taken down Dec. 27, and the new system is slated to come online Feb. 1. In that time, there are two local elections that will make use of the old hardware, Jensen said.

Deputy Fairfax County Registrar Greg Scott said the new system can create “matches” with statewide data that can more easily identify voters.

“If we have someone who registers to vote and they flip two numbers of their Social Security number, the system we have now says they are two different people,” he said.

The change is mandated by the Help America Vote Act of 2002.

wflook@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

2:16 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 6, 2008 re: "Vote tallying could present another fiasco"

Jiminy Cricket said:
What a wicked we weave !!!- The Supes were warned not to buy these bogus systems - but except for Ammiano and Daly, they did it anyway .. The shame !! Now SF is the biggest fool as they too are in the HAVA trap - Bob Ney paved the way for the big $ vendors to skim the cream - billions of our tax dollars sent to the boys in the back. We must make a stand against the black hats and take back our democracy- He who counts the votes must not be allowed to skate away- JC

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:55 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 6, 2007 re: "Virginia primaries open to all voters, regardless of party"

Steve Rankin, Jackson, Mississippi said:
The Virginia Republicans' lawsuit against their open-primary law is now in the 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond. It's based largely on the US Supreme Court's 2000 ruling in the California case that you noted. The lower court held in the Virginia case that, when a party is forced to nominate by primary, the party decides who votes in that primary. This was the first time any court had ever said that there is a situation in which the state may not require a party to hold an open primary. The Mississippi Democrats' similar open-primary lawsuit will be heard by the US District Court on July 30. If the courts outlaw state-mandated open primaries-- as I believe they will-- each party will be free to determine who votes in its primaries. Utah, e.g., registers voters by party. The Republicans there invite independents to vote in their primaries, whereas the Democrats invite ALL voters into their primaries.

406 agree | 477 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:07 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 20, 2007 re: "House passes District voting rights bill"

Zeadman said:
mmmmmmmmmm interesting. i am a republican populist moderate. i think that most people in the us are now that. any way i believe that the district should be treated as any other district in any state in the Union. it is a district just like the first district of Utah. or Iowa or Idaho...... so yes it is good that they now have a vote even thow they have always had a vote because of what they are. they are a district out side of a state. thats is all they deserve a vote just like us. thanks -Zeadman

277 agree | 294 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)