Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Washington, D.C. (Map, News) - The advocacy group that led the push for the looming D.C. smoking ban is urging the D.C. Council to reject proposed regulations for administering the prohibition.
Smokefree DC, an organization focused on banning smoking in District workplaces, is reacting with disdain to rules submitted by Mayor Anthony Williams earlier this week. They will be automatically adopted after 60 days if the Council takes no action.
“We hope that you will do everything in your power to ensure that the D.C. Council rejects this draft and adopts a better set of regulations that are truly consistent with the intent of the law,” Angela Bradberry, Smokefree DC co-founder, wrote in a Dec. 4 letter to Council Member David Catania, chairman of the health committee.
The smoking ban takes effect Jan. 2 in all bars, restaurants and most indoor workplaces. Mayor-elect Adrian Fenty, a strong supporter of anti-smoking laws, takes office the same day and could rewrite the regulations if they haven’t already been approved.
With regard to Williams’ proposal, Bradberry is especially concerned with the process by which a business would obtain an economic hardship waiver - away around the ban.
To be eligible for a waiver, Williams wants proof of a 5 percent sales reduction over three consecutive months, plus evidence of either unanticipated revenue losses, falling food or alcohol sales, or reduced staffing levels. But anti-smoking activists are demanding that D.C. mirror New York’s law, which requires a 15 percent drop in sales with no wiggle room for other considerations.
The mayor’s plan would “undermine” the ban by establishing “a wide-open process that would grant permanent waivers with a very low threshold for demonstrating ‘damage,’ ” Bradberry wrote.
“On this matter, I will follow the lead of the advocates,” said Council Member Phil Mendelson. “I’ve been very supportive of what they’re trying to do.”
In his transmittal letter to Council Chair Linda Cropp, Williams said he sought protections for the hospitality industry to ensure “it does not suffer indiscriminately because of this policy decision,” which he opposed.
mneibauer@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
5:07 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 15, 2007 re: "Home Depot adopts local family to help with Christmas"
Report as inappropriate
7:12 PM MST on Wed., Sep. 19, 2007
re: "D.C. Council member proposes new route for Metro through the city"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
i am in need of help i have 4 boys 1 girlwith foodtoys cloths. 2222upperhunters trace 6026146521ihave one 4 year old that can not here one 7 with heart trouble please help melissapack.packrenee@yahoo.com
91 agree | 103 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"you could board at Greenbelt and you could take it all the way to National Airport and Franconia-Springfield without transferring" That's pretty damn lazy since all those transfers are to trains on the exact same track... unless walking those three feet is a problem.
141 agree | 154 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree